| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The WP All Export Pro WordPress plugin before 1.7.9 uses the contents of the cc_sql POST parameter directly as a database query, allowing users which has been given permission to run exports to execute arbitrary SQL statements, leading to a SQL Injection vulnerability. By default only users with the Administrator role can perform exports, but this can be delegated to lower privileged users as well. |
| The Blog2Social: Social Media Auto Post & Scheduler WordPress plugin before 6.9.10 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement, leading to a SQL injection exploitable by any authenticated users, such as subscribers |
| The Plugin LBstopattack WordPress plugin before 1.1.3 does not use nonces when saving its settings, making it possible for attackers to conduct CSRF attacks. This could allow attackers to disable the plugin's protections. |
| Free5gc v3.2.1 is vulnerable to Information disclosure. |
| Reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in WithSecure through 2022-08-10) exists within the F-Secure Policy Manager due to an unvalidated parameter in the endpoint, which allows remote attackers to provide a malicious input. |
| A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client API of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to modify their profile parameters due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated attacker to impersonate another user's name. |
| A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client API of Mitel MiCollab 9.1.3 through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to modify their profile parameters due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated attacker to control another extension number. |
| A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload malicious files. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the application. |
| A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client server component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack due to insufficient restriction of URL parameters. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to leverage connections and permissions available to the host server. |
| PRTG Network Monitor through 22.2.77.2204 does not prevent custom input for a device’s icon, which can be modified to insert arbitrary content into the style tag for that device. When the device page loads, the arbitrary Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) data is inserted into the style tag, loading malicious content. Due to PRTG Network Monitor preventing “characters, and from modern browsers disabling JavaScript support in style tags, this vulnerability could not be escalated into a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. |
| Usermin through 1.850 allows a remote authenticated user to execute OS commands via command injection in a filename for the GPG module. |
| A vulnerability in the radius authentication system of Brocade Fabric OS before Brocade Fabric OS 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the Brocade switch. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in stm32_mw_usb_host of STMicroelectronics in versions before 3.5.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code when the descriptor contains more endpoints than USBH_MAX_NUM_ENDPOINTS. The library is typically integrated when using a RTOS such as FreeRTOS on STM32 MCUs. |
| A malicious crafted TGA file when consumed through DesignReview.exe application could lead to memory corruption vulnerability. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. |
| A malicious crafted TGA file when consumed through DesignReview.exe application could lead to memory corruption vulnerability. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. |
| A malicious crafted .dwf or .pct file when consumed through DesignReview.exe application could lead to memory corruption vulnerability by write access violation. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. |
| A malicious crafted .dwf or .pct file when consumed through DesignReview.exe application could lead to memory corruption vulnerability by write access violation. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. |
| A malicious crafted .dwf or .pct file when consumed through DesignReview.exe application could lead to memory corruption vulnerability by write access violation. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. |
| A malicious crafted .dwf or .pct file when consumed through DesignReview.exe application could lead to memory corruption vulnerability by write access violation. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. |
| A malicious crafted .dwf or .pct file when consumed through DesignReview.exe application could lead to memory corruption vulnerability by write access violation. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. |
