| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Pexip Infinity before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort via HTTP. |
| Pexip Infinity before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort via One Touch Join. |
| Pexip Infinity before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort via One Touch Join. |
| Pexip Infinity before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort via the Session Initiation Protocol. |
| Pexip Infinity 27.x before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort via single-sign-on if a random Universally Unique Identifier is guessed. |
| Pexip Infinity 27.x before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort via HTTP. |
| Pexip Infinity 27.x before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort via the Session Initiation Protocol. |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! 4.2.0 through 4.2.3. Inadequate filtering of potentially malicious user input leads to reflected XSS vulnerabilities in various components. |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! 4.0.0 through 4.2.3. Sites with publicly enabled debug mode exposed data of previous requests. |
| A flaw was found in buildah where containers were incorrectly started with non-empty default permissions. A bug was found in Moby (Docker Engine) where containers were incorrectly started with non-empty inheritable Linux process capabilities, enabling an attacker with access to programs with inheritable file capabilities to elevate those capabilities to the permitted set when execve(2) runs. This has the potential to impact confidentiality and integrity. |
| A flaw was found in crun where containers were incorrectly started with non-empty default permissions. A vulnerability was found in Moby (Docker Engine) where containers were started incorrectly with non-empty inheritable Linux process capabilities. This flaw allows an attacker with access to programs with inheritable file capabilities to elevate those capabilities to the permitted set when execve(2) runs. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rebooter(WATCH BOOT nino RPC-M2C [End of Sale] all firmware versions, WATCH BOOT light RPC-M5C [End of Sale] all firmware versions, WATCH BOOT L-zero RPC-M4L [End of Sale] all firmware versions, WATCH BOOT mini RPC-M4H [End of Sale] all firmware versions, WATCH BOOT nino RPC-M2CS firmware version 1.00A to 1.00D, WATCH BOOT light RPC-M5CS firmware version 1.00A to 1.00D, WATCH BOOT L-zero RPC-M4LS firmware version 1.00A to 1.20A, and Signage Rebooter RPC-M4HSi firmware version 1.00A), PoE Rebooter(PoE BOOT nino PoE8M2 firmware version 1.00A to 1.20A), Scheduler(TIME BOOT mini RSC-MT4H [End of Sale] all firmware versions, TIME BOOT RSC-MT8F [End of Sale] all firmware versions, TIME BOOT RSC-MT8FP [End of Sale] all firmware versions, TIME BOOT mini RSC-MT4HS firmware version 1.00A to 1.10A, and TIME BOOT RSC-MT8FS firmware version 1.00A to 1.00E), and Contact Converter(POSE SE10-8A7B1 firmware version 1.00A to 1.20A) allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator and conduct arbitrary operations by having a user to view a specially crafted page. |
| Forcepoint One Endpoint prior to version 22.01 installed on Microsoft Windows does not provide sufficient anti-tampering protection of services by users with Administrator privileges. This could result in a user disabling Forcepoint One Endpoint and the protection offered by it. |
| Forcepoint One Endpoint prior to version 22.01 installed on Microsoft Windows is vulnerable to registry key tampering by users with Administrator privileges. This could result in a user disabling anti-tampering mechanisms which would then allow the user to disable Forcepoint One Endpoint and the protection offered by it. |
| An unauthenticated user can overload a part of HCL VersionVault Express and cause a denial of service. |
| HCL VersionVault Express exposes administrator credentials. |
| HCL iNotes is susceptible to a Broken Password Strength Checks vulnerability. Custom password policies are not enforced on certain iNotes forms which could allow users to set weak passwords, leading to easier cracking. |
| HCL iNotes is susceptible to a link to non-existent domain vulnerability. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick a user into supplying sensitive information such as username, password, credit card number, etc. |
| HCL iNotes is susceptible to a Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability caused by improper validation of user-supplied input supplied with a form POST request. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially-crafted URL to execute script in a victim's web browser within the security context of the hosting web site and/or steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials. |
| BigFix Web Reports authorized users may perform HTML injection for the email administrative configuration page. |
