Export limit exceeded: 43068 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (43068 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-48056 | 1 Bandoche | 1 Pypinksign | 2025-01-07 | 7.5 High |
| PyPinkSign v0.5.1 uses a non-random or static IV for Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode in AES encryption. This vulnerability can lead to the disclosure of information and communications. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12106 | 1 Progress | 1 Whatsup Gold | 2025-01-06 | 9.4 Critical |
| In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2024.0.2, an unauthenticated attacker can configure LDAP settings. | ||||
| CVE-2023-31437 | 1 Systemd Project | 1 Systemd | 2025-01-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in systemd 253. An attacker can modify a sealed log file such that, in some views, not all existing and sealed log messages are displayed. NOTE: the vendor reportedly sent "a reply denying that any of the finding was a security vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2024-49767 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 3 Quart, Werkzeug, Openshift Ai | 2025-01-03 | 7.5 High |
| Werkzeug is a Web Server Gateway Interface web application library. Applications using `werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser` corresponding to a version of Werkzeug prior to 3.0.6 to parse `multipart/form-data` requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds. Werkzeug version 3.0.6 fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32645 | 1 Vyperlang | 1 Vyper | 2025-01-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, incorrect values can be logged when `raw_log` builtin is called with memory or storage arguments to be used as topics. A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. The `build_IR` function of the `RawLog` class fails to properly unwrap the variables provided as topics. Consequently, incorrect values are logged as topics. As of time of publication, no fixed version is available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32646 | 1 Vyperlang | 1 Vyper | 2025-01-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `slice` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when the buffer argument is either `msg.data`, `self.code` or `<address>.code` and either the `start` or `length` arguments have side-effects. It can be easily triggered only with the versions `<0.3.4` as `0.3.4` introduced the unique symbol fence. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32647 | 1 Vyperlang | 1 Vyper | 2025-01-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `create_from_blueprint` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when `raw_args=True` and the `args` argument has side-effects. It can be seen that the `_build_create_IR` function of the `create_from_blueprint` builtin doesn't cache the mentioned `args` argument to the stack. As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack). No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions exist. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32649 | 1 Vyperlang | 1 Vyper | 2025-01-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `sqrt` builtin can result in double eval vulnerability when the argument has side-effects. It can be seen that the `build_IR` function of the `sqrt` builtin doesn't cache the argument to the stack. As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack). No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41038 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Sharepoint Foundation, Sharepoint Server | 2025-01-02 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-41037 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Sharepoint Foundation, Sharepoint Server | 2025-01-02 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-41036 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Sharepoint Foundation, Sharepoint Server | 2025-01-02 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-38042 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 18 more | 2025-01-02 | 7.1 High |
| Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-33645 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 18 more | 2025-01-02 | 7.5 High |
| Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-33635 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 18 more | 2025-01-02 | 7.8 High |
| Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-33634 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 18 more | 2025-01-02 | 8.1 High |
| Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-35820 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 17 more | 2025-01-02 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Bluetooth Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-35827 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Visual Studio, Visual Studio 2017, Visual Studio 2019 and 1 more | 2025-01-02 | 8.8 High |
| Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-35826 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Visual Studio, Visual Studio 2017, Visual Studio 2019 and 1 more | 2025-01-02 | 8.8 High |
| Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-35825 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Visual Studio, Visual Studio 2017, Visual Studio 2019 and 1 more | 2025-01-02 | 8.8 High |
| Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-35824 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Site Recovery | 2025-01-02 | 7.2 High |
| Azure Site Recovery Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||