Export limit exceeded: 380928 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (380928 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-102275 | 2026-09-28 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6721 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Concert, Linux Kernel | 2026-09-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker can supply specially crafted input that is incorporated into OS commands, resulting in arbitrary command execution on the underlying system. Successful exploitation allows remote code execution with the privileges of the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101187 | 1 Ziroom | 1 Zhome A0101 | 2026-09-28 | 9.1 Critical |
| A weakness has been identified in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0. This vulnerability affects the function pop_usb_device of the file usr/lib/lua/luci/controller/api/zrUsb.lua of the component USB Device Management API. This manipulation of the argument path causes command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91096 | 2026-09-28 | N/A | ||
| In proxygen from v2024.10.28.00 until v2026.09.28.00, WebTransportImpl::terminateSessionStreams (WebTransportImpl::destroy in releases before v2025.08.18.00) failed to unregister read callbacks for streams that were no longer open before destroying them. The transport could then invoke a read callback that had been freed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91095 | 2026-09-28 | N/A | ||
| In proxygen from v2024.10.28.00 until v2026.09.28.00, the HTTPTransaction::onWebTransportUniStream and HTTPTransaction::onWebTransportBidiStream APIs could return stream handles that the stream handler had already freed. HQSession then installed those handles as transport read callbacks, which could lead to use of freed memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84895 | 2026-09-28 | N/A | ||
| In proxygen from v2026.04.06.00 until v2026.09.28.00, QuicWtSession::closeSession accesses its member fields after calling the base QuicWtSessionBase::closeSession method. The base method notifies the session handler, which may release the last reference to the session and destroy it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102274 | 2026-09-28 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.9.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWKSet does not catch the plain ValueError raised for malformed RSA JWK components by RSAAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/api_jwk.py. This occurs when a JWK Set contains a malformed RSA key alongside otherwise usable keys. As a result, one malformed member aborts construction of the entire PyJWKSet. Consequently, applications can experience authentication failures or request-level denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102273 | 2026-09-28 | 7.4 High | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWT HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key is affected because HMAC key guard only recognizes top-level public JWK forms and misses container representations. This occurs when an application allows HMAC and asymmetric algorithms and passes a public JWK container as the raw key. As a result, public asymmetric key material is accepted as the HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge a token with arbitrary authenticated claims. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102272 | 2026-09-28 | 7.4 High | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because raw-JWK detector does not normalize accepted Unicode byte-order marks before checking for JSON. This occurs when a public JWK is prefixed with a UTF-8 BOM and used in a mixed-algorithm verification path. As a result, public JWK bypasses asymmetric-key detection and becomes the HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated tokens. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102271 | 2026-09-28 | 7.4 High | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.4.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWT HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key is affected because asymmetric-key guard relies on textual markers that are absent from DER encoding. This occurs when an application mixes HMAC and asymmetric algorithms and supplies a DER public key as the shared verification key. As a result, PyJWT uses public DER bytes as an HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101146 | 1 Eleveo | 1 Quality Management | 2026-09-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Eleveo Quality Management 9.7.0. This issue affects the function UtilsService.createAndSaveAudit of the file /qm/cz.zoom.scorecard.webui.Scorecard/QMUtilsService of the component GWT RPC Handler. Performing a manipulation results in information disclosure. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102270 | 2026-09-28 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT is_pem_format is affected because lazy PEM regular expression backtracks extensively. This occurs when a certificate-like input contains repeated BEGIN markers without a matching END marker. As a result, is_pem_format performs unbounded backtracking while searching for a PEM end marker. Consequently, an attacker can cause intensive CPU consumption. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102269 | 2026-09-28 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT signature segment is affected because signature segment decoding accepts characters outside the canonical Base64URL representation. This occurs when non-Base64URL characters are appended to a valid compact JWS signature segment. As a result, base64url_decode produces the same signature bytes for different serialized segments. Consequently, raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102268 | 2026-09-28 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, is_pem_format in jwt/utils.py is affected because is_pem_format does not recognize every PEM representation accepted by the cryptography loader. This occurs when an application mixes HMAC and asymmetric algorithms and supplies a mutated public-key PEM as raw key bytes. As a result, HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key treats the unrecognized asymmetric public key as an HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102267 | 2026-09-28 | 7.4 High | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT PyJWKClient is affected because redirect destinations are not revalidated against the JWKS trust boundary. This occurs when a configured trusted JWKS endpoint returns an attacker-influenced redirect. As a result, PyJWKClient follows the redirect and consumes the redirected response as key material. Consequently, forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102266 | 2026-09-28 | 7.4 High | ||
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, HMACAlgorithm.from_jwk is affected because PyJWK verification path used the decoded key without applying prepare_key validation. This occurs when a trusted JWK Set contains an oct entry with an empty k value. As a result, an attacker signs an HMAC token with the same zero-length key accepted by PyJWT. Consequently, forged token can carry arbitrary authenticated claims. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70582 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-09-28 | 6.4 Medium |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Management Instrumentation allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70583 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 18 more | 2026-09-28 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Core Messaging allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77492 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-09-28 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Storage Port Driver allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97686 | 2026-09-28 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| Wind River VxWorks 7 prior to 26.09, specific system call arguments can result in the IPNET subsystem failing to properly release allocated kernel memory and system file descriptors before terminating the calling application. Fixed in Version 26.09. Security Researcher: Zhi Yang Bingren Wu Finding | ||||