Search

Search Results (368537 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-35160 1 Dell 1 Smartfabric Os10 Software 2026-09-04 5 Medium
Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software, versions prior to 10.5.6.14, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution.
CVE-2026-17517 2026-09-04 5.3 Medium
The Content Views WordPress plugin before 4.5.1.2 does not check whether the user requesting a view is allowed to read the posts it returns, allowing unauthenticated attackers to obtain the title and content of non-public posts, such as draft, pending, private and scheduled posts, when a view has been configured to include them.
CVE-2026-19224 2026-09-04 7.2 High
The Hummingbird Performance WordPress plugin before 3.21.2 does not restrict a network-wide setting to network administrators, allowing an administrator of any single site on a multisite network to execute arbitrary code across the entire network.
CVE-2026-74853 2026-09-04 6.8 Medium
The Pods WordPress plugin before 3.3.9.2 does not restrict which functions a display callback may resolve to, allowing users with the author role and above to read arbitrary files from the server, including files outside the web root. Only sites using the restricted display-callback mode are affected, which is the automatic default on installations whose first Pods version predates 3.1.
CVE-2026-79632 2 Getwpfunnels, Wordpress 2 Wpfunnels, Wordpress 2026-09-04 5.3 Medium
The WPFunnels WordPress plugin before 3.13.0 does not perform any authorisation or nonce check in one of its opt-in submission handlers, and takes the notification recipients and subject from the request, allowing unauthenticated users to make the site send emails to arbitrary recipients with an arbitrary subject.
CVE-2026-82194 2 Wordpress, Wpvividplugins 2 Wordpress, Wpvivid — Backup, Migration & Staging 2026-09-04 5.5 Medium
The WPvivid — Backup, Migration & Staging WordPress plugin before 0.9.134 does not validate a user supplied path before using it in a file deletion routine, allowing administrators to delete arbitrary files on the server, including files outside the web root.
CVE-2026-84146 2 Wordpress, Xpro 2 Wordpress, Xpro Addons — 140+ Widgets For Elementor 2026-09-04 5.3 Medium
The Xpro Addons — 140+ Widgets for Elementor WordPress plugin before 1.7.8 does not perform any capability or post-status check before rendering a WooCommerce product summary from a supplied product identifier, allowing unauthenticated visitors to retrieve the title, price, SKU, description and stock details of products that are not publicly published (draft, pending, private or scheduled status).
CVE-2026-59355 2 Broadcom, Spring 2 Spring Authorization Server, Spring Authorization Server 2026-09-04 6.1 Medium
In versions of Spring Authorization Server 1.5.0 through 1.5.7, the authorization endpoint performs insufficient validation of the request_uri parameter. An attacker can craft a request containing an invalid request_uri paired with an unvalidated redirect_uri, which can result in an open redirect to an attacker-controlled site.
CVE-2026-81572 2 Wibu-systems-ag, Wibusys 2 Codemeter-runtime, Codemeter Runtime Kit 2026-09-04 7.8 High
In CodeMeter Runtime from version 8.40 to (excluding) 8.41a and 9.00 to (excluding) 9.10, cmu.exe --create-io --file C: creates a predictable temporary file under C:\CM-Stick. The directory and file paths are not properly checked for NTFS reparse points, such as junctions or symbolic links, before file operations are performed. A local attacker can create a junction at the temporary file that points to an arbitrary system path. Because CodeMeter Runtime runs with System privileges, this could allow arbitrary files to be deleted with System privileges and potentially enable local privilege escalation.
CVE-2026-81575 2 Wibu-systems-ag, Wibusys 2 Codemeter-runtime, Codemeter Runtime Kit 2026-09-04 7.5 High
If configured as a server, CodeMeter Runtime before versions 8.41a and 9.10 accepts requests with opcode 0x5e, which contain the data length and the data itself. Missing bounds checking on the data length value can lead to out of bounds reads, causing a segmentation fault that ultimately crashes the CodeMeter Runtime.
CVE-2026-81576 2 Wibu-systems-ag, Wibusys 2 Codemeter-runtime, Codemeter Runtime Kit 2026-09-04 7.7 High
If configured as a server, CodeMeter Runtime before versions 8.41a and 9.10 issues handles per connection and relies on a cryptographically weak SID as sole authenticator. An attacker can brute-force the SID, recover another session's handle number, and read license information belonging to another handle.
CVE-2026-58400 1 Geonetwork 1 Geonetwork 2026-09-04 9.1 Critical
GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. Prior to versions 4.4.12 and 4.2.17, the Saxon XSLT processor used to render formatters is configured without secure processing (`FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING`) and without disabling Java extension functions (`ALLOW_EXTERNAL_FUNCTIONS`). Any stylesheet loaded by GeoNetwork can therefore invoke `java.lang.Runtime.exec()` or `java.lang.ProcessBuilder` directly, achieving arbitrary command execution as the GeoNetwork process user. A user with sufficient privileges to upload a formatter can deliver a `.xsl` file containing Java extension call that execute arbitrary OS commands with the privileges of the GeoNetwork process. The issue is patched in GeoNetwork versions 4.4.12 and 4.2.17.
CVE-2026-63219 1 Geonetwork 1 Geonetwork 2026-09-04 8.6 High
GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. Prior to versions 4.4.12 and 4.2.17, the API endpoint for creating a new formatter via file upload is unprotected and allows the upload of external uncontrolled files. An unauthenticated attacker can upload arbitrary `.xsl` or `.zip` formatter files to the server. An unauthenticated attacker can write arbitrary files into the GeoNetwork formatter directory. On its own this constitutes unauthorized write access to server storage. The issue is patched in GeoNetwork versions 4.4.12 and 4.2.17.
CVE-2026-83959 1 Adobe 1 Substance 3d Sampler 2026-09-04 7.8 High
Substance3D - Sampler is affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
CVE-2026-83711 1 Microsoft 2 Azure Active Directory B2c, Entra Id 2026-09-04 10 Critical
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Azure Active Directory B2C allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
CVE-2026-67402 1 Configserver 1 Configserver Security Firewall 2026-09-04 N/A
An insecure Apache configuration in ConfigServer Security & Firewall maps /usr/bin as CGI programs through the Messenger v3 HTTPS virtual host. A remote unauthenticated attacker whose address is blocked can request a mapped executable and run arbitrary commands as the Apache user. The vulnerability affects installations where CSF Messenger v3 and its HTTPS mode are enabled. WebPros addressed the vulnerability in version 16.31.
CVE-2026-45200 1 Imaginationtech 1 Graphics Ddk 2026-09-04 N/A
Software installed and run as a non-privileged user may conduct improper GPU driver IOCTL calls to create an allocation scenario that when freed would cause double free and kernel heap corruption. Scenario caused by fabricating a specific combination of flags on the allocation interface that would cause an incorrect double free event when freed.
CVE-2026-45197 1 Imaginationtech 1 Graphics Ddk 2026-09-04 N/A
Kernel software installed and running inside a Guest VM may post improper commands to the GPU Firmware to trigger a read and/or write data outside the Guest's virtualised GPU memory. The firmware uses data provided by the Guest VM to set up accesses to memory. It validated this before use, but a TOCTOU bug was present which allowed the earlier check results to be invalidated.
CVE-2026-80764 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-09-04 N/A
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_event: fix LE list UAF on reset hci_cc_reset() clears the LE accept and resolving lists without taking hdev->lock. Other command-complete handlers serialize updates to these lists with that lock, and the debugfs readers hold it while walking them. This permits the reset completion and a debugfs read to interleave as follows: hci_rx_work debugfs reader ----------- -------------- lock hdev->lock fetch current entry list_del(entry) kfree(entry) read entry fields The reader then dereferences a freed list entry and may follow its stale next pointer. KASAN reported: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in white_list_show+0x15f/0x180 Read of size 1 at addr ffff8881015dab16 by task poc/95 Call Trace: white_list_show+0x15f/0x180 seq_read_iter+0x3ff/0x1190 seq_read+0x267/0x3d0 vfs_read+0x177/0xa20 ksys_read+0xf7/0x1c0 Allocated by task 91: hci_bdaddr_list_add+0x1a6/0x3a0 hci_cc_le_add_to_accept_list+0xab/0x140 hci_cmd_complete_evt+0x26c/0x9a0 hci_event_packet+0x454/0xb20 hci_rx_work+0x293/0x730 Freed by task 90: kfree+0x131/0x3c0 hci_bdaddr_list_clear+0xd8/0x160 hci_cc_reset+0x28a/0x370 hci_cmd_complete_evt+0x26c/0x9a0 hci_event_packet+0x454/0xb20 hci_rx_work+0x293/0x730 Take hdev->lock around both list clears. This matches the existing mutation and traversal locking convention.
CVE-2026-78658 1 Ibm 2 Ucd Ibm Devops Deploy, Ucd Ibm Urbancode Deploy 2026-09-04 6.5 Medium
IBM UCD - IBM UrbanCode Deploy 7.2 through 7.2.3.25, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.20 and IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.15, 8.1 through 8.1.2.8, and 8.2 through 8.2.2.1 IBM DevOps Deploy / IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) is susceptible to an formation disclosure vulnerability when processing redacted property values. If a deployment is configured with a secure property that starts with certain non-ASCII characters, the redaction engine may fail to mask subsequent ASCII secure values embedded inside unsecure properties. An authenticated user with permissions to view deployment request details could exploit this flaw via the UI or API to view sensitive values in plain text that should otherwise be redacted.