Export limit exceeded: 29489 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12199 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-50105 | 1 Oracle | 1 Universal Work Queue | 2026-02-26 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Universal Work Queue product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Work Provider Administration). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Universal Work Queue. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Universal Work Queue accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Universal Work Queue accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2025-5777 | 2 Citrix, Netscaler | 4 Netscaler Application Delivery Controller, Netscaler Gateway, Adc and 1 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.5 High |
| Insufficient input validation leading to memory overread when the NetScaler is configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) OR AAA virtual server | ||||
| CVE-2025-5349 | 1 Citrix | 2 Netscaler Application Delivery Controller, Netscaler Gateway | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Improper access control on the NetScaler Management Interface in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway | ||||
| CVE-2025-34510 | 1 Sitecore | 4 Experience Commerce, Experience Manager, Experience Platform and 1 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), Experience Platform (XP), and Experience Commerce (XC) versions 9.0 through 9.3 and 10.0 through 10.4 are affected by a Zip Slip vulnerability. A remote, authenticated attacker can exploit this issue by sending a crafted HTTP request to upload a ZIP archive containing path traversal sequences, allowing arbitrary file writes and leading to code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34511 | 1 Sitecore | 4 Experience Commerce, Experience Manager, Experience Platform and 1 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Sitecore PowerShell Extensions, an add-on to Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) and Experience Platform (XP), through version 7.0 is vulnerable to an unrestricted file upload issue. A remote, authenticated attacker can upload arbitrary files to the server using crafted HTTP requests, resulting in remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54313 | 5 Alexghr, Homarr, Microsoft and 2 more | 8 Got-fetch, Homarr, Windows and 5 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.5 High |
| eslint-config-prettier 8.10.1, 9.1.1, 10.1.6, and 10.1.7 has embedded malicious code for a supply chain compromise. Installing an affected package executes an install.js file that launches the node-gyp.dll malware on Windows. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36004 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| IBM i 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5 could allow a user to gain elevated privileges due to an unqualified library call in IBM Facsimile Support for i. A malicious actor could cause user-controlled code to run with administrator privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20708 | 1 Mediatek | 64 Modem, Mt2735, Mt2737 and 61 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01123853; Issue ID: MSV-4131. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20704 | 1 Mediatek | 16 Mt6813, Mt6835, Mt6835t and 13 more | 2026-02-26 | 8 High |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01516959; Issue ID: MSV-3502. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20705 | 4 Google, Linuxfoundation, Mediatek and 1 more | 43 Android, Yocto, Monitor Hang and 40 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In monitor_hang, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09989078; Issue ID: MSV-3964. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20706 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 7 Android, Mbrain, Mt6899 and 4 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In mbrain, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09924624; Issue ID: MSV-3826. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3586 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.2 High |
| In Liferay Portal 7.4.3.27 through 7.4.3.42, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.20, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 update 27 through update 42 (Liferay PaaS, and Liferay Self-Hosted), the Objects module does not restrict the use of Groovy scripts in Object actions for Admin Users. This allows remote authenticated admin users with the Instance Administrator role to execute arbitrary Groovy scripts (i.e., remote code execution) through Object actions. In contrast, in Liferay DXP (Liferay SaaS), the use of Groovy in Object actions is not allowed due to the high security risks it poses. Starting from Liferay DXP 2024.Q2 and later, a new feature has been introduced in Instance Settings that allows administrators to configure whether Groovy scripts are allowed in their instances. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40653 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.3 High |
| In multiple functions of ConnectionServiceWrapper.java, there is a possible way to retain a permission forever in the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49720 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of Permissions.java, there is a possible way to override the state of the user's location permissions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49730 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In FuseDaemon.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22416 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In onCreate of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way to view other users' images due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22417 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.3 High |
| In finishTransition of Transition.java, there is a possible way to bypass touch filtering restrictions due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22418 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible confused deputy due to Intent Redirect. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22419 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.3 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to mislead the user into enabling malicious phone calls forwarding due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22422 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to mislead a user into approving an authentication prompt for one app when its result will be used in another due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||