Export limit exceeded: 358228 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2507 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-46713 | 1 Misskey | 1 Misskey | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| Misskey is an open source, federated social media platform. Versions 12.37.0 and later, but prior to 2026.5.4, contain a vulnerability in the JSON-LD signature validation and compaction process that allows spoofed activities to be accepted as valid. This issue has been fixed in version 2026.5.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0392 | 1 Latvijas Valsts Radio Un Televīzijas Centrs (lvrtc) | 1 Eparakstītājs 3.0 | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| eParakstītājs 3.0 for Windows before version 1.10.0 retrieves and executes its automatic updates over a channel that is not authenticated or integrity-protected. On each launch the application fetches an update descriptor (XML) over TLS but accepts any TLS certificate (a permissive TrustManager and a HostnameVerifier that always returns true), does not verify any digital signature on the update descriptor, and does not verify the Authenticode signature or a checksum of the downloaded installer before running it. A man-in-the-middle attacker able to redirect www.eparaksts.lv can serve a crafted update descriptor pointing to an attacker-controlled executable, which the client downloads and executes, resulting in arbitrary code execution on the victim host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62517 | 1 Oracle | 2 E-business Suite, Production Scheduling | 2026-08-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Production Scheduling product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Production Scheduling. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Production Scheduling accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-17883 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Headless in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to bypass same origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-12383 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) server. The ExternalEventStreamViewSet uses permissive access controls (permission_classes=[AllowAny], authentication_classes=[]) and relies solely on the Subject HTTP header value for mTLS authentication without verifying that the header originated from a trusted proxy. Additionally, the expected certificate Distinguished Name is leaked in the 403 error response body. An attacker who can reach the EDA API endpoint with a spoofed Subject header can inject arbitrary events into mTLS-protected event streams, triggering downstream automation actions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67618 | 1 Marimo-team | 1 Marimo | 2026-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| marimo before 0.23.15 contains a configuration injection vulnerability that allows notebook authors to exfiltrate operator API keys by embedding a malicious base_url in PEP-723 inline script metadata, which is merged into session configuration with higher precedence than the operator's own settings due to insufficient sanitization in sanitize_pyproject_dict. When an operator opens the crafted notebook and makes an AI request, marimo resolves the attacker-controlled base_url from the notebook config while falling back to the operator's OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable for authentication, transmitting the API key to the attacker-controlled endpoint without requiring any cell execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66318 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-08-04 | 8.1 High |
| Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66313 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-08-04 | 6.8 Medium |
| Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18569 | 1 Redhat | 6 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid and 3 more | 2026-08-04 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in the backchannel logout endpoint of the keycloak-services component, which is part of the Red Hat Build of Keycloak. This component handles authentication and session management for applications. The issue occurs when an OIDC identity provider is configured to skip signature validation. In this specific setup, the system incorrectly accepts logout requests that have no cryptographic signature. An attacker who knows certain technical details about a user's session can use this flaw to force that user to be logged out, potentially disrupting their work. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66317 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-08-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66322 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-08-04 | 7.1 High |
| Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12369 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-08-04 | 4.2 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in OIDC-Client. When using the RH SSO OIDC adapter with EAP 7.x or when using the elytron-oidc-client subsystem with EAP 8.x, authorization code injection attacks can occur, allowing an attacker to inject a stolen authorization code into the attacker's own session with the client with a victim's identity. This is usually done with a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) or phishing attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17762 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-08-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-17842 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to bypass same origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-18016 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-08-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13887 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in NFC in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14053 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-39155 | 1 Knot-dns | 1 Knot Dns | 2026-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Knot DNS before 3.4.10 and 3.5.x before 3.5.4 contains a vulnerability in mod-onlinesign where the next NSEC owner name can be computed incorrectly. This can create an overly broad authenticated denial interval, allowing downstream validating resolvers using aggressive negative caching to synthesize negative answers for legitimate names and causing resolver-side denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18092 | 1 Timlegge | 2 Net::saml2, Net\ | 2026-08-03 | 8.1 High |
| Net::SAML2 versions before 0.86 for Perl allow SAML authentication bypass via XML signature wrapping because new_from_xml reads assertion identity with document-wide XPath instead of the signed subtree. new_from_xml reads the NameID, attribute values, SessionIndex, audience and other identity fields with document-wide XPath, such as //saml:Assertion/saml:AttributeStatement/saml:Attribute and //saml:Subject/saml:NameID, which select the first matching element in document order rather than the element covered by the verified signature. handle_response confirms that a signature is present and, when a cacert is configured, that it chains to the CA, but XML::Sig verifies only the element named by the signature's Reference URI, so unsigned sibling assertions in the same document are not covered. An attacker who holds any one IdP-signed assertion can add an unsigned attacker-authored assertion earlier in document order; the signature still verifies and the document-order XPath returns the attacker's NameID and attributes. Any caller that passes an untrusted Response to new_from_xml can accept identity fields from an assertion the IdP never signed, even when a cacert trust anchor is configured, so a party holding one valid IdP-signed assertion can authenticate as an arbitrary user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9487 | 2 Timlegge, Xml\ | 2 Xml::sig, \ | 2026-08-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| XML::Sig versions before 0.71 for Perl allow signature wrapping via duplicate ID. _get_signed_xml() in lib/XML/Sig.pm, called from verify(), resolves the SignedInfo Reference/@URI to a node with the XPath expression "//*[@ID='$id']" and returns the first node of the resulting node set. A document in which two elements share that ID value is accepted: the digest and signature are checked against whichever element comes first in document order, and the duplicate is not detected. Such a document verifies successfully while an application that resolves the same ID independently can read the second, attacker supplied element; in a SAML2 context this places the contents of an Assertion under attacker control. | ||||