| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Quipux 4.0.1 through e1774ac allows enumeration of usernames, and accessing the Ecuadorean identification number for all registered users via the Administracion/usuarios/cambiar_password_olvido_validar.php txt_login parameter. |
| PTZOptics and possibly other ValueHD-based pan-tilt-zoom cameras use hard-coded, default administrative credentials. The passwords can readily be cracked. Many cameras have SSH or telnet listening on all interfaces. The passwords cannot be changed by the user, nor can the SSH or telnet service be disabled by the user. |
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in UTT 进取 750W up to 3.2.2-191225. This affects an unknown part of the file /goform/Fast_wireless_conf. The manipulation of the argument ssid leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the bulletin board (SchwarzeBrett) in adata Software GmbH Mitarbeiter Portal 2.15.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the web browser of other users via manipulation of the 'Inhalt' parameter of the '/SchwarzeBrett/Nachrichten/CreateNachricht' or '/SchwarzeBrett/Nachrichten/EditNachricht/' requests. |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.6, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.1 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.0 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 24.1 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. |
| A client-side enforcement of server-side security vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.4, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.6 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests. |
| An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.2, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.6, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.1 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.5 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.4 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.3 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.1 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.0 all versions allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via CLI. |
| An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.4, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.1 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.0.4 through 3.0.7 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. |
| A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability [CWE-134] vulnerability in Fortinet allows a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests. |
| Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilties [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet allows a local authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary shell code as `root` user via crafted CLI requests. |
| 51l3nc3, a member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API uploadoverlayimage.cgi did not have sufficient input validation to allow an attacker to upload files to block access to create image overlays in the web interface of the Axis device. |
| During an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communications, Truesec discovered a flaw in the VAPIX Device Configuration framework that allowed for unauthenticated username enumeration through the VAPIX Device Configuration SSH Management API. |
| Koa is expressive middleware for Node.js using ES2017 async functions. In koa < 2.16.1 and < 3.0.0-alpha.5, passing untrusted user input to ctx.redirect() even after sanitizing it, may execute javascript code on the user who use the app. This issue is patched in 2.16.1 and 3.0.0-alpha.5. |
| Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions prior to 19.18.0.2, contains an Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure. |
| Mattermost Plugin MSTeams versions <2.1.0 and Mattermost Server versions 10.5.x <=10.5.1 with the MS Teams plugin enabled fail to perform constant time comparison on a MSTeams plugin webhook secret which allows an attacker to retrieve the webhook secret of the MSTeams plugin via a timing attack during webhook secret comparison. |
| An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.4, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.6, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.2.2 through 3.2.4, FortiSandbox 3.1.5 allows attacker to information disclosure via HTTP get requests. |
| A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.4, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.6, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.1 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.5 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.4 all versions allows attacker to information disclosure via crafted http requests. |
| A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.3, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.6, FortiSandbox 4.0.0 through 4.0.4 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via via crafted API requests. |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via via crafted API requests. |
