Export limit exceeded: 29340 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 29340 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (29340 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-26171 | 3 Apple, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 2 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.5 High |
| Uncontrolled resource consumption in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14593 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32178 | 3 Apple, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 2 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.5 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10900 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| AA maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10899 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| AA maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10898 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| AA maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10889 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10888 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| AA maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10887 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10886 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10884 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| AA maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10883 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31743 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvmem: zynqmp_nvmem: Fix buffer size in DMA and memcpy Buffer size used in dma allocation and memcpy is wrong. It can lead to undersized DMA buffer access and possible memory corruption. use correct buffer size in dma_alloc_coherent and memcpy. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10882 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| AA maliciously crafted X_T file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10881 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31442 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: idxd: Fix possible invalid memory access after FLR In the case that the first Function Level Reset (FLR) concludes correctly, but in the second FLR the scratch area for the saved configuration cannot be allocated, it's possible for a invalid memory access to happen. Always set the deallocated scratch area to NULL after FLR completes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31444 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-07 | 9.8 Critical |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smb_grant_oplock() smb_grant_oplock() has two issues in the oplock publication sequence: 1) opinfo is linked into ci->m_op_list (via opinfo_add) before add_lease_global_list() is called. If add_lease_global_list() fails (kmalloc returns NULL), the error path frees the opinfo via __free_opinfo() while it is still linked in ci->m_op_list. Concurrent m_op_list readers (opinfo_get_list, or direct iteration in smb_break_all_levII_oplock) dereference the freed node. 2) opinfo->o_fp is assigned after add_lease_global_list() publishes the opinfo on the global lease list. A concurrent find_same_lease_key() can walk the lease list and dereference opinfo->o_fp->f_ci while o_fp is still NULL. Fix by restructuring the publication sequence to eliminate post-publish failure: - Set opinfo->o_fp before any list publication (fixes NULL deref). - Preallocate lease_table via alloc_lease_table() before opinfo_add() so add_lease_global_list() becomes infallible after publication. - Keep the original m_op_list publication order (opinfo_add before lease list) so concurrent opens via same_client_has_lease() and opinfo_get_list() still see the in-flight grant. - Use opinfo_put() instead of __free_opinfo() on err_out so that the RCU-deferred free path is used. This also requires splitting add_lease_global_list() to take a preallocated lease_table and changing its return type from int to void, since it can no longer fail. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31446 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix use-after-free in update_super_work when racing with umount Commit b98535d09179 ("ext4: fix bug_on in start_this_handle during umount filesystem") moved ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing s_sb_upd_work to prevent new error work from being queued via /proc/fs/ext4/xx/mb_groups reads during unmount. However, this introduced a use-after-free because update_super_work calls ext4_notify_error_sysfs() -> sysfs_notify() which accesses the kobject's kernfs_node after it has been freed by kobject_del() in ext4_unregister_sysfs(): update_super_work ext4_put_super ----------------- -------------- ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb) kobject_del(&sbi->s_kobj) __kobject_del() sysfs_remove_dir() kobj->sd = NULL sysfs_put(sd) kernfs_put() // RCU free ext4_notify_error_sysfs(sbi) sysfs_notify(&sbi->s_kobj) kn = kobj->sd // stale pointer kernfs_get(kn) // UAF on freed kernfs_node ext4_journal_destroy() flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) Instead of reordering the teardown sequence, fix this by making ext4_notify_error_sysfs() detect that sysfs has already been torn down by checking s_kobj.state_in_sysfs, and skipping the sysfs_notify() call in that case. A dedicated mutex (s_error_notify_mutex) serializes ext4_notify_error_sysfs() against kobject_del() in ext4_unregister_sysfs() to prevent TOCTOU races where the kobject could be deleted between the state_in_sysfs check and the sysfs_notify() call. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31447 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-07 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: reject mount if bigalloc with s_first_data_block != 0 bigalloc with s_first_data_block != 0 is not supported, reject mounting it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43048 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-07 | 8.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: core: Mitigate potential OOB by removing bogus memset() The memset() in hid_report_raw_event() has the good intention of clearing out bogus data by zeroing the area from the end of the incoming data string to the assumed end of the buffer. However, as we have previously seen, doing so can easily result in OOB reads and writes in the subsequent thread of execution. The current suggestion from one of the HID maintainers is to remove the memset() and simply return if the incoming event buffer size is not large enough to fill the associated report. Suggested-by Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org> [bentiss: changed the return value] | ||||