| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In gokey versions <0.2.0,
a flaw in the seed decryption logic resulted in passwords incorrectly
being derived solely from the initial vector and the AES-GCM
authentication tag of the key seed.
This issue has been fixed in gokey version 0.2.0. This is a breaking change. The fix has invalidated any passwords/secrets that were derived from the seed file (using the -s option). Even if the input seed file stays the same, version 0.2.0 gokey will generate different secrets.
Impact
This vulnerability impacts generated keys/secrets using a seed file as an entropy input (using the -s option). Keys/secrets generated just from the master password (without the -s
option) are not impacted. The confidentiality of the seed itself is
also not impacted (it is not required to regenerate the seed itself).
Specific impact includes:
* keys/secrets generated from a seed file may have lower entropy: it
was expected that the whole seed would be used to generate keys (240
bytes of entropy input), where in vulnerable versions only 28 bytes was
used
* a malicious entity could have recovered all passwords, generated
from a particular seed, having only the seed file in possession without
the knowledge of the seed master password
Patches
The code logic bug has been fixed in gokey version 0.2.0
and above. Due to the deterministic nature of gokey, fixed versions
will produce different passwords/secrets using seed files, as all seed
entropy will be used now.
System secret rotation guidance
It is advised for users to regenerate passwords/secrets using the patched version of gokey (0.2.0
and above), and provision/rotate these secrets into respective systems
in place of the old secret. A specific rotation procedure is
system-dependent, but most common patterns are described below.
Systems that do not require the old password/secret for rotation
Such systems usually have a "Forgot password" facility or a
similar facility allowing users to rotate their password/secrets by
sending a unique "magic" link to the user's email or phone. In such
cases users are advised to use this facility and input the newly
generated password secret, when prompted by the system.
Systems that require the old password/secret for rotation
Such systems usually have a modal password rotation window
usually in the user settings section requiring the user to input the
old and the new password sometimes with a confirmation. To
generate/recover the old password in such cases users are advised to:
* temporarily download gokey version 0.1.3 https://github.com/cloudflare/gokey/releases/tag/v0.1.3 for their respective operating system to recover the old password
* use gokey version 0.2.0 or above to generate the new password
* populate the system provided password rotation form
Systems that allow multiple credentials for the same account to be provisioned
Such systems usually require a secret or a cryptographic
key as a credential for access, but allow several credentials at the
same time. One example is SSH: a particular user may have several
authorized public keys configured on the SSH server for access. For such
systems users are advised to:
* generate a new secret/key/credential using gokey version 0.2.0 or above
* provision the new secret/key/credential in addition to the existing credential on the system
* verify that the access or required system operation is still possible with the new secret/key/credential
* revoke authorization for the existing/old credential from the system
Credit
This vulnerability was found by Théo Cusnir ( @mister_mime https://hackerone.com/mister_mime ) and responsibly disclosed through Cloudflare's bug bounty program. |
| An exploitable remote code execution vulnerability exists in the upload.cgi functionality of Sierra Wireless AirLink ES450 FW 4.9.3. A specially crafted HTTP request can upload a file, resulting in executable code being uploaded, and routable, to the webserver. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. |
| N-central versions < 2025.4 are vulnerable to multiple XML External Entities injection leading to information disclosure |
| IBM webMethods Integration 10.11 through 10.11_Core_Fix22, 10.15 through 10.15_Core_Fix22, and 11.1 through 11.1_Core_Fix6 IBM webMethods Integration allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by the deserialization of untrusted object graphs data. |
| cups-filters contains backends, filters, and other software required to get the cups printing service working on operating systems other than macos. In versions 2.0.1 and prior, a heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability in the rastertopclx filter causes the program to crash with a segmentation fault when processing maliciously crafted input data. This issue can be exploited to trigger memory corruption, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. This issue has been patched via commit 956283c. |
| A vulnerability in OpenSearch allows attackers to cause Denial of Service (DoS) by submitting complex query_string inputs.
This issue affects all OpenSearch versions between 3.0.0 and < 3.3.0 and OpenSearch < 2.19.4. |
| WBCE CMS is a content management system. Prior to version 1.6.4, a low-privileged user in WBCE CMS can escalate their privileges to the Administrators group by manipulating the groups[] parameter in the /admin/users/save.php request. The UI restricts users to assigning only their existing group, but server-side validation is missing, allowing attackers to overwrite their group membership and obtain full administrative access. This results in a complete compromise of the CMS. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.4. |
| The Chassis Management Board in Entrust nShield Connect XC, nShield 5c, and nShield HSMi through 13.6.11, or 13.7, allows a physically proximate attacker to obtain debug access and escalate privileges by bypassing the tamper label and opening the chassis without leaving evidence, and accessing the JTAG connector. This is called F02. |
| The Chassis Management Board in Entrust nShield Connect XC, nShield 5c, and nShield HSMi through 13.6.11, or 13.7, allows a physically proximate attacker to persistently modify firmware and influence the (insecurely configured) appliance boot process. To exploit this, the attacker must modify the firmware via JTAG or perform an upgrade to the chassis management board firmware. This is called F03. |
| Entrust nShield Connect XC, nShield 5c, and nShield HSMi through 13.6.11, or 13.7, allow a user with OS root access to alter firmware on the Chassis Management Board (without Authentication). This is called F04. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VibeThemes WPLMS theme <= 4.900 versions. |
| Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Forms in Liferay Portal 7.3.2 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, 7.4 GA through update 92, and 7.3 GA through update 35 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a form with a rich text type field. |
| Multiple stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a user’s first, middle or last name text field to (1) page comments widget, (2) blog entry comments, (3) document and media document comments, (4) message board messages, (5) wiki page comments or (6) other widgets/apps that supports mentions. |
| Open redirect vulnerability in page administration in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.97, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary external URLs via the _com_liferay_layout_admin_web_portlet_GroupPagesPortlet_redirect parameter. |
| Self Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability on the edit Knowledge Base article page in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.101, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into an attachment's filename. |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q3.0 through 2025.Q3.2, 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.12, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.17, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.20, and 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10 allows an remote non-authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript into the google_gadget. |
| Improper Authentication in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to send malicious data to the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions that will treat it as trusted data via unauthenticated cluster messages. |
| Liferay Portal 7.3.0 through 7.4.3.119, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 7.4 GA through update 92 and 7.3 GA though update 36 shows content to users who do not have permission to view it via the Menu Display Widget. This security flaw could result in sensitive information being exposed to unauthorized users. |
| Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allows remote authenticated users in one virtual instance to assign an organization to a user in a different virtual instance via the _com_liferay_users_admin_web_portlet_UsersAdminPortlet_addUserIds parameter. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Liferay DXP 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.3 due to insecure domain validation on analytics.cloud.domain.allowed, allowing an attacker to perform requests by change the domain and bypassing the validation method, this insecure validation is not distinguishing between trusted subdomains and malicious domains. |
