| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| CODESYS Runtime Toolkit-based products may expose sensitive files to local low-privileged operating system users due to default file permissions. |
| A low-privileged attacker can remotely access the PKI folder of the CODESYS Control runtime system and thus read and write certificates and its keys. This allows sensitive data to be extracted or to accept certificates as trusted. Although all services remain available, only unencrypted communication is possible if the certificates are deleted. |
| OS command injection vulnerability exists in network storage servers STEALTHONE D220/D340/D440 provided by Y'S corporation. A user with an administrative privilege who logged in to the web management page of the affected product may execute an arbitrary OS command. |
| An low privileged remote attacker can enforce the watchdog of the affected devices to reboot the PLC due to incorrect default permissions of a config file. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ActFax Server version 5.01. The server's RAW protocol interface fails to safely process user-supplied data in @F506 fax header fields due to insecure usage of strcpy. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted @F506 fields, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires network access to TCP port 4559 and does not require authentication. |
| A low privileged remote attacker with file access can replace a critical file used by the watchdog to get read, write and execute access to any file on the device after the watchdog has been initialized. |
| A low privileged remote attacker with file access can replace a critical file used by the arp-preinit script to get read, write and execute access to any file on the device. |
| OS command injection vulnerability exists in network storage servers STEALTHONE D220/D340 provided by Y'S corporation. An attacker who can access the affected product may execute an arbitrary OS command. |
| A low privileged remote attacker with file access can replace a critical file or folder used by the service security-profile to get read, write and execute access to any file on the device. |
| pwn.college is an education platform to learn about, and practice, core cybersecurity concepts in a hands-on fashion. Missing access control on rendering custom (unprivileged) dojo pages causes ability for users to create stored XSS. |
| Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Angular uses a DI container (the "platform injector") to hold request-specific state during server-side rendering. For historical reasons, the container was stored as a JavaScript module-scoped global variable. When multiple requests are processed concurrently, they could inadvertently share or overwrite the global injector state. In practical terms, this can lead to one request responding with data meant for a completely different request, leaking data or tokens included on the rendered page or in response headers. As long as an attacker had network access to send any traffic that received a rendered response, they may have been able to send a large number of requests and then inspect the responses for information leaks. The APIs `bootstrapApplication`, `getPlatform`, and `destroyPlatform` were vulnerable and required SSR-only breaking changes.
The issue has been patched in all active release lines as well as in the v21 prerelease. Patched packages include `@angular/platform-server` 21.0.0-next.3, 20.3.0, 19.2.15, and 18.2.14 and `@angular/ssr` 21.0.0-next.3, 20.3.0, 19.2.16, and 18.2.21. Several workarounds are available. Disable SSR via Server Routes or builder options, remove any asynchronous behavior from custom `bootstrap` functions, remove uses of `getPlatform()` in application code, and/or ensure that the server build defines `ngJitMode` as false. |
| PHP-Charts v1.0 contains a PHP code execution vulnerability in wizard/url.php, where user-supplied GET parameter names are passed directly to eval() without sanitization. A remote attacker can exploit this flaw by crafting a request that injects arbitrary PHP code, resulting in command execution under the web server's context. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to execute system-level commands via base64-encoded payloads embedded in parameter names, leading to full compromise of the host system. |
| An authenticated, low-privileged attacker can obtain credentials stored on the charge controller including the manufacturer password. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot recv
Don't allow overflowing multishot recv CQEs, it might get out of
hand, hurt performance, and in the worst case scenario OOM the task. |
| A low-privileged local attacker can exploit improper permissions on nssm.exe to escalate their privileges and gain administrative access. |
| Vela is a Pipeline Automation (CI/CD) framework built on Linux container technology written in Golang. Prior to versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3, by spoofing a webhook payload with a specific set of headers and body data, an attacker could transfer ownership of a repository and its repo level secrets to a separate repository. These secrets could be exfiltrated by follow up builds to the repository. Users with an enabled repository with access to repo level CI secrets in Vela are vulnerable to the exploit, and any user with access to the CI instance and the linked source control manager can perform the exploit. Versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3 fix the issue. No known workarounds are available. |
| A high privileged remote attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands using an undocumented method allowing to escape the implemented LUA sandbox. |
| An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading arbitrary
files via the a specific endpoint, leading to unauthorized remote code
execution or system compromise. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can get access without password protection to the affected device. This enables the unprotected read-only access to the stored measurement data. |
| A low privileged local attacker can interact with the affected service although user-interaction should not be allowed. |
