| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The component listed above contains a vulnerability that can be exploited by an attacker to perform a SQL Injection attack. This could lead to unauthorised access to the database and exposure of sensitive information |
| Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux may be vulnerable to Spring Environment property modification.
An application should be considered vulnerable when all the following are true:
* The application is using Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux (Spring Cloud Gateway Server WebMVC is not vulnerable).
* Spring Boot actuator is a dependency.
* The Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux actuator web endpoint is enabled via management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=gateway.
* The actuator endpoints are available to attackers.
* The actuator endpoints are unsecured. |
| VMware Tools for Windows contains an improper authorisation vulnerability due to the way it handles user access controls. A malicious actor with non-administrative privileges on a guest VM, who is already authenticated through vCenter or ESX may exploit this issue to access other guest VMs. Successful exploitation requires knowledge of credentials of the targeted VMs and vCenter or ESX. |
| VMware ESXi, Workstation, Fusion, and VMware Tools contains an information disclosure vulnerability due to the usage of an uninitialised memory in vSockets. A malicious actor with local administrative privileges on a virtual machine may be able to exploit this issue to leak memory from processes communicating with vSockets. |
| Spring Cloud Gateway Server forwards the X-Forwarded-For and Forwarded headers from untrusted proxies. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.10.0). The affected products do not properly enforce interface access restrictions when changing from management to non-management interface configurations until a system reboot occurs, despite configuration being saved. This could allow an attacker with network access and credentials to gain access to device through non-management and maintain SSH access to the device until reboot. |
| Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability stored in tha Taclia web application, where the uploaded SVG images are not properly sanitized. This allows to the attackers to embed malicious scripts in SVG files such as image profiles, which are then stored on the server and executed in the context of any user who accesses the compromised resource. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in webuidesigning NebulaX Theme up to 5.0 on WordPress. This issue affects the function nebula_send_to_hubspot of the file libs/Legacy/Legacy.php. The manipulation leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The patch is named 41230a81db0f671c570c2644bc2f80565ca83c5a. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. |
| Lack of authorisation in Deporsite by T-INNOVA. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to change other users' profile pictures via a POST request using the parameters ‘IdPersona’ and “Foto” in ‘/ajax/TInnova_c/FotoUsuario/llamadaAjax/uploadImage’. |
| Inadequate access control vulnerability in Davantis DDFUSION v6.177.7, which allows unauthorised actors to retrieve perspective parameters from security camera settings by accessing “/cameras/<CAMERA_ID>/perspective”. |
| SQL injection in Sergestec's SISTICK v7.2. This vulnerability allows an attacker to retrieve, create, update, and delete databases through the 'id' parameter in '/index.php?view=ticket_detail'. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the DRED virtual campus platform. This vulnerability allows an attacker to retrieve, create, update, and delete data from the database by sending a POST request using the ‘buscame’ parameter in ‘/catalogo_c/catalogo.php’. |
| KV STUDIO versions 12.23 and prior contain a buffer underflow vulnerability. If the product uses a specially crafted file, arbitrary code may be executed on the affected product. |
| A Stored Cross Site Scripting vulnerability has been found in UltimatePOS by UltimateFosters. This vulnerability is due to the lack of proper validation of user inputs via ‘/products/<PRODUCT_ID>/edit’, affecting to ‘name’ parameter via POST. The vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to send a specially crafted query to an authenticated user and steal his/her session cookies details. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in SCATI Vision Web of SCATI Labs from version 4.8 to 7.2. This vulnerability allows an attacker to exfiltrate some data from the database via the ‘login’ parameter in the endpoint ‘/scatevision_web/index.php/loginForm’. |
| Apache::AuthAny::Cookie v0.201 or earlier for Perl generates session ids insecurely.
Session ids are generated using an MD5 hash of the epoch time and a call to the built-in rand function. The epoch time may be guessed, if it is not leaked from the HTTP Date header. The built-in rand function is unsuitable for cryptographic usage.
Predicable session ids could allow an attacker to gain access to systems. |
| JSON::SIMD before version 1.07 and earlier for Perl has an integer buffer overflow causing a segfault when parsing crafted JSON, enabling denial-of-service attacks or other unspecified impact. |
| Starch versions 0.14 and earlier generate session ids insecurely.
The default session id generator returns a SHA-1 hash seeded with a counter, the epoch time, the built-in rand function, the PID, and internal Perl reference addresses. The PID will come from a small set of numbers, and the epoch time may be guessed, if it is not leaked from the HTTP Date header. The built-in rand function is unsuitable for cryptographic usage.
Predicable session ids could allow an attacker to gain access to systems. |
| Cpanel::JSON::XS before version 4.40 for Perl has an integer buffer overflow causing a segfault when parsing crafted JSON, enabling denial-of-service attacks or other unspecified impact |
| Authen::DigestMD5 versions 0.01 through 0.02 for Perl generate the cnonce insecurely.
The cnonce (client nonce) is generated from an MD5 hash of the PID, the epoch time and the built-in rand function. The PID will come from a small set of numbers, and the epoch time may be guessed, if it is not leaked from the HTTP Date header. The built-in rand function is unsuitable for cryptographic usage.
According to RFC 2831, "The cnonce-value is an opaque quoted string value provided by the client and used by both client and server to avoid chosen plaintext attacks, and to provide mutual authentication. The security of the implementation depends on a good choice. It is RECOMMENDED that it contain at least 64 bits of entropy." |
