| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.2 SP1). The affected application allows users to upload encrypted backup files. As part of this backup, files can be restored without correctly checking the path of the restored file. This could allow an attacker with access to the backup encryption key to upload malicious files, that could potentially lead to remote code execution. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.2 HF1). Affected applications are vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading SNMP configurations. This could allow an attacker with the right to modify the SNMP configuration to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.2 HF1). Affected applications are vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading VxLAN configurations. This could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Client (All versions < V3.2 HF1). The system service of affected applications is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading VPN configurations. This could allow an administrative remote attacker running a corresponding SINEMA Remote Connect Server to execute arbitrary code with system privileges on the client system. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Client (All versions < V3.2 HF1). The system service of affected applications is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading proxy configurations. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to execute arbitrary code with system privileges. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Client (All versions < V3.2 HF1). The system service of affected applications is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading VPN configurations. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to execute arbitrary code with system privileges. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2406). The affected application contains a type confusion vulnerability while parsing IGS files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-21562) |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2406). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing a specially crafted IGS part file. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2406). The affected applications contain an out of bounds read past the end of an allocated structure while parsing specially crafted IGS files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiPAM version 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiWeb, FortiAuthenticator, FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.1 through 7.0.3, FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.16, 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 2.0.0 through 2.0.13, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets. |
| An improper neutralization of input during web page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiOS version 7.4.3 and below, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions and FortiProxy version 7.4.2 and below, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions reboot page may allow a remote privileged attacker with super-admin access to execute JavaScript code via crafted HTTP GET requests. |
| A use of password hash with insufficient computational effort vulnerability [CWE-916] affecting FortiOS version 7.4.3 and below, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions and FortiProxy version 7.4.2 and below, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 2.0 all versions may allow a privileged attacker with super-admin profile and CLI access to decrypting the backup file. |
| Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation
contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the
Windows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the
AVX512-IFMA instructions.
Impact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker
can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application
state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences.
The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does
not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform
when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to
the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their
previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors
supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions.
The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can
be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not
depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst
consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application
process. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so
the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence,
if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent
calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service.
The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the
CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data)
algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol
versions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD
cipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using
OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of
any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we
consider this a Low severity security issue.
As a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at
runtime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap:
OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000
The FIPS provider is not affected by this issue. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.1 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.7 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.12 and 6.4.6 through 6.4.15 and 6.2.9 through 6.2.16 and 6.0.13 through 6.0.18 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted CLI commands. |
| The product does not require unique and complex passwords to be created
during installation. Using Philips's default password could jeopardize
the PACS system if the password was hacked or leaked. An attacker could
gain access to the database impacting system availability and data
integrity. |
| A heap buffer overflow vulnerability in Wibu CodeMeter Runtime network service up to version 7.60b allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to achieve RCE and gain full access of the host system. |
| Versions of the package tough-cookie before 4.1.3 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution due to improper handling of Cookies when using CookieJar in rejectPublicSuffixes=false mode. This issue arises from the manner in which the objects are initialized. |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Office OneNote Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Windows Contacts Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
