Export limit exceeded: 17073 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (17073 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2022-2133 1 Miniorange 1 Oauth Single Sign On 2024-11-21 5.3 Medium
The OAuth Single Sign On WordPress plugin before 6.22.6 doesn't validate that OAuth access token requests are legitimate, which allows attackers to log onto the site with the only knowledge of a user's email address.
CVE-2022-2118 1 Tooltulips 1 404s 2024-11-21 4.8 Medium
The 404s WordPress plugin before 3.5.1 does not sanitise and escape its fields, allowing high privilege users such as admin to perform cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed.
CVE-2022-2114 1 Supsystic 1 Data Tables Generator 2024-11-21 4.8 Medium
The Data Tables Generator by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.10.20 does not sanitise and escape some of its Table settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup)
CVE-2022-2100 1 Wpzinc 1 Page Generator 2024-11-21 4.8 Medium
The Page Generator WordPress plugin before 1.6.5 does not sanitise and escape its settings, allowing high privilege users such as admin to perform cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed.
CVE-2022-2099 1 Woocommerce 1 Woocommerce 2024-11-21 4.8 Medium
The WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 6.6.0 is vulnerable to stored HTML injection due to lack of escaping and sanitizing in the payment gateway titles
CVE-2022-2095 1 Gitlab 1 Gitlab 2024-11-21 4.3 Medium
An improper access control check in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 13.7 before 15.0.5, all versions starting from 15.1 before 15.1.4, all versions starting from 15.2 before 15.2.1 allows a malicious authenticated user to view a public project's Deploy Key's public fingerprint and name when that key has write permission. Note that GitLab never asks for nor stores the private key.
CVE-2022-2090 1 Flycart 1 Discount Rules For Woocommerce 2024-11-21 6.1 Medium
The Discount Rules for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.4.2 does not escape a parameter before outputting it back in an attribute of the plugin's discount rule page, leading to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting
CVE-2022-2053 1 Redhat 5 Integration Camel K, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Eus and 2 more 2024-11-21 7.5 High
When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2.
CVE-2022-2037 1 Tooljet 1 Tooljet 2024-11-21 8.0 High
Excessive Attack Surface in GitHub repository tooljet/tooljet prior to v1.16.0.
CVE-2022-2036 1 Rosariosis 1 Rosariosis 2024-11-21 5.4 Medium
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Stored in GitHub repository francoisjacquet/rosariosis prior to 9.0.1.
CVE-2022-2035 1 Ltgplc 1 Rustici Software Scorm Engine 2024-11-21 6.1 Medium
A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the playerConfUrl parameter in the /defaultui/player/modern.html file for SCORM Engine versions < 20.1.45.914, 21.1.x < 21.1.7.219. The issue exists because there are no limitations on the domain or format of the url supplied by the user, allowing an attacker to craft malicious urls which can trigger a reflected XSS payload in the context of a victim's browser.
CVE-2022-2029 1 Kromit 1 Titra 2024-11-21 5.4 Medium
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - DOM in GitHub repository kromitgmbh/titra prior to 0.77.0.
CVE-2022-2028 1 Kromit 1 Titra 2024-11-21 5.4 Medium
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Generic in GitHub repository kromitgmbh/titra prior to 0.77.0.
CVE-2022-2027 1 Kromit 1 Titra 2024-11-21 8.0 High
Improper Neutralization of Formula Elements in a CSV File in GitHub repository kromitgmbh/titra prior to 0.77.0.
CVE-2022-2026 1 Kromit 1 Titra 2024-11-21 5.4 Medium
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Stored in GitHub repository kromitgmbh/titra prior to 0.77.0.
CVE-2022-2016 1 Facturascripts 1 Facturascripts 2024-11-21 5.4 Medium
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository neorazorx/facturascripts prior to 2022.1.
CVE-2022-2015 1 Diagrams 1 Drawio 2024-11-21 5.4 Medium
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Stored in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 19.0.2.
CVE-2022-2014 1 Diagrams 1 Drawio 2024-11-21 5.4 Medium
Code Injection in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 19.0.2.
CVE-2022-29890 1 Octopus 1 Octopus Server 2024-11-21 6.1 Medium
In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link.
CVE-2022-29622 1 Formidable Project 1 Formidable 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
An arbitrary file upload vulnerability in formidable v3.1.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted filename. NOTE: some third parties dispute this issue because the product has common use cases in which uploading arbitrary files is the desired behavior. Also, there are configuration options in all versions that can change the default behavior of how files are handled. Strapi does not consider this to be a valid vulnerability.