| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the Microsoft Windows Update Client when it does not properly handle privileges, aka 'Microsoft Windows Update Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1336. |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows CloudStore improperly handles file Discretionary Access Control List (DACL), aka 'Microsoft Windows CloudStore Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles authentication requests, aka 'Microsoft Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1322, CVE-2019-1340. |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Error Reporting (WER) when WER handles and executes files, aka 'Windows Error Reporting Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles hard links, aka 'Microsoft Windows Denial of Service Vulnerability'. |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows Setup when it does not properly handle privileges, aka 'Microsoft Windows Setup Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Imaging API improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Imaging API Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1307, CVE-2019-1335, CVE-2019-1366. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1308, CVE-2019-1335, CVE-2019-1366. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1238. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft XML Core Services MSXML parser processes user input, aka 'MS XML Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. |
| ext/misc/zipfile.c in SQLite 3.30.1 mishandles certain uses of INSERT INTO in situations involving embedded '\0' characters in filenames, leading to a memory-management error that can be detected by (for example) valgrind. |
| Missing output sanitation in Swisscom Centro Grande Centro Grande before 6.16.12, Centro Business 1.0 (ADB) before 7.10.18, and Centro Business 2.0 before 8.02.04 allows a remote attacker to perform DNS spoofing against the web interface via crafted hostnames in DHCP requests. |
| On Moxa EDS-G508E, EDS-G512E, and EDS-G516E devices (with firmware through 6.0), denial of service can occur via PROFINET DCE-RPC endpoint discovery packets. |
| In the macho_parse_file functionality in macho/macho.c of YARA 3.11.0, command_size may be inconsistent with the real size. A specially crafted MachO file can cause an out-of-bounds memory access, resulting in Denial of Service (application crash) or potential code execution. |
| vcs_write in drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.13 does not prevent write access to vcsu devices, aka CID-0c9acb1af77a. |
| Tobesoft XPlatform v9.1, 9.2.0, 9.2.1 and 9.2.2 have a vulnerability that can load unauthorized DLL files. It allows attacker to cause remote code execution. |
| A memory leak in the adis_update_scan_mode() function in drivers/iio/imu/adis_buffer.c in the Linux kernel before 5.3.9 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption), aka CID-ab612b1daf41. |
| Cloud Native Computing Foundation Harbor prior to 1.8.6 and 1.9.3 allows CSRF in the VMware Harbor Container Registry for the Pivotal Platform. |
| UniValue::read() in UniValue before 1.0.5 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (the class internal data reaches an inconsistent state) via input data that triggers an error. |
