Search Results (23621 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-7522 1 Phpgurukul 1 Vehicle Parking Management System 2025-09-26 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability has been found in PHPGurukul Vehicle Parking Management System 1.13 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/bwdates-reports-details.php. The manipulation of the argument fromdate/todate leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2025-7520 1 Phpgurukul 1 Vehicle Parking Management System 2025-09-26 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in PHPGurukul Vehicle Parking Management System 1.13. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/manage-category.php. The manipulation of the argument del leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2025-7561 1 Phpgurukul 1 Online Fire Reporting System 2025-09-26 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Online Fire Reporting System 1.2. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/team-ontheway-requests.php. The manipulation of the argument teamid leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2025-7491 1 Phpgurukul 1 Vehicle Parking Management System 2025-09-26 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Vehicle Parking Management System 1.13. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/manage-outgoingvehicle.php. The manipulation of the argument del leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2025-7492 1 Phpgurukul 1 Vehicle Parking Management System 2025-09-26 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Vehicle Parking Management System 1.13. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /admin/manage-incomingvehicle.php. The manipulation of the argument del leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2024-12533 1 Phoenixtech 1 Securecore Technology 2025-09-25 3.3 Low
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Phoenix SecureCore Technology 4 allows Input Data Manipulation.This issue affects SecureCore Technology 4: from 4.0.1.0 before 4.0.1.1018, from 4.1.0.1 before 4.1.0.573, from 4.2.0.1 before 4.2.0.338, from 4.2.1.1 before 4.2.1.300, from 4.3.0.1 before 4.3.0.244, from 4.3.1.1 before 4.3.1.187, from 4.4.0.1 before 4.4.0.299, from 4.5.0.1 before 4.5.0.231, from 4.5.1.1 before 4.5.1.103, from 4.5.5.1 before 4.5.5.36, from 4.6.0.1 before 4.6.0.67.
CVE-2025-48954 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2025-09-25 8.1 High
Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Versions prior to 3.5.0.beta6 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting when the content security policy isn't enabled when using social logins. Version 3.5.0.beta6 patches the issue. As a workaround, have the content security policy enabled.
CVE-2024-41045 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-09-25 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Defer work in bpf_timer_cancel_and_free Currently, the same case as previous patch (two timer callbacks trying to cancel each other) can be invoked through bpf_map_update_elem as well, or more precisely, freeing map elements containing timers. Since this relies on hrtimer_cancel as well, it is prone to the same deadlock situation as the previous patch. It would be sufficient to use hrtimer_try_to_cancel to fix this problem, as the timer cannot be enqueued after async_cancel_and_free. Once async_cancel_and_free has been done, the timer must be reinitialized before it can be armed again. The callback running in parallel trying to arm the timer will fail, and freeing bpf_hrtimer without waiting is sufficient (given kfree_rcu), and bpf_timer_cb will return HRTIMER_NORESTART, preventing the timer from being rearmed again. However, there exists a UAF scenario where the callback arms the timer before entering this function, such that if cancellation fails (due to timer callback invoking this routine, or the target timer callback running concurrently). In such a case, if the timer expiration is significantly far in the future, the RCU grace period expiration happening before it will free the bpf_hrtimer state and along with it the struct hrtimer, that is enqueued. Hence, it is clear cancellation needs to occur after async_cancel_and_free, and yet it cannot be done inline due to deadlock issues. We thus modify bpf_timer_cancel_and_free to defer work to the global workqueue, adding a work_struct alongside rcu_head (both used at _different_ points of time, so can share space). Update existing code comments to reflect the new state of affairs.
CVE-2024-41003 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-09-25 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix reg_set_min_max corruption of fake_reg Juan reported that after doing some changes to buzzer [0] and implementing a new fuzzing strategy guided by coverage, they noticed the following in one of the probes: [...] 13: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) ; R0=map_value(ks=4,vs=8) R6_w=scalar() 14: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0 15: (b4) w0 = -1 ; R0_w=0xffffffff 16: (74) w0 >>= 1 ; R0_w=0x7fffffff 17: (5c) w6 &= w0 ; R0_w=0x7fffffff R6_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=umax32=0x7fffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff)) 18: (44) w6 |= 2 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=umax32=0x7fffffff,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) 19: (56) if w6 != 0x7ffffffd goto pc+1 REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (true_reg2): range bounds violation u64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] u32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (false_reg1): range bounds violation u64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] u32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (false_reg2): const tnum out of sync with range bounds u64=[0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff] s64=[0x8000000000000000, 0x7fffffffffffffff] u32=[0x0, 0xffffffff] s32=[0x80000000, 0x7fffffff] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) 19: R6_w=0x7fffffff 20: (95) exit from 19 to 21: R0=0x7fffffff R6=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=0x7ffffffe,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 21: R0=0x7fffffff R6=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=0x7ffffffe,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 21: (14) w6 -= 2147483632 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=umin32=2,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=0x80000012,smax32=14,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffd)) 22: (76) if w6 s>= 0xe goto pc+1 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=umin32=2,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=0x80000012,smax32=13,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffd)) 23: (95) exit from 22 to 24: R0=0x7fffffff R6_w=14 R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 24: R0=0x7fffffff R6_w=14 R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 24: (14) w6 -= 14 ; R6_w=0 [...] What can be seen here is a register invariant violation on line 19. After the binary-or in line 18, the verifier knows that bit 2 is set but knows nothing about the rest of the content which was loaded from a map value, meaning, range is [2,0x7fffffff] with var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd). When in line 19 the verifier analyzes the branch, it splits the register states in reg_set_min_max() into the registers of the true branch (true_reg1, true_reg2) and the registers of the false branch (false_reg1, false_reg2). Since the test is w6 != 0x7ffffffd, the src_reg is a known constant. Internally, the verifier creates a "fake" register initialized as scalar to the value of 0x7ffffffd, and then passes it onto reg_set_min_max(). Now, for line 19, it is mathematically impossible to take the false branch of this program, yet the verifier analyzes it. It is impossible because the second bit of r6 will be set due to the prior or operation and the constant in the condition has that bit unset (hex(fd) == binary(1111 1101). When the verifier first analyzes the false / fall-through branch, it will compute an intersection between the var_off of r6 and of the constant. This is because the verifier creates a "fake" register initialized to the value of the constant. The intersection result later refines both registers in regs_refine_cond_op(): [...] t = tnum_intersect(tnum_subreg(reg1->var_off), tnum_subreg(reg2->var_off)); reg1->var_o ---truncated---
CVE-2022-48821 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-09-25 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: misc: fastrpc: avoid double fput() on failed usercopy If the copy back to userland fails for the FASTRPC_IOCTL_ALLOC_DMA_BUFF ioctl(), we shouldn't assume that 'buf->dmabuf' is still valid. In fact, dma_buf_fd() called fd_install() before, i.e. "consumed" one reference, leaving us with none. Calling dma_buf_put() will therefore put a reference we no longer own, leading to a valid file descritor table entry for an already released 'file' object which is a straight use-after-free. Simply avoid calling dma_buf_put() and rely on the process exit code to do the necessary cleanup, if needed, i.e. if the file descriptor is still valid.
CVE-2025-9568 2 Sun.net, Sunnet 2 Ehrd Ctms, Ehrd Ctms 2025-09-25 6.1 Medium
The eHRD developed by Sunnet has a Reflected Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript codes in user's browser through phishing attacks.
CVE-2025-9570 2 Sun.net, Sunnet 2 Ehrd Ctms, Ehrd Ctms 2025-09-25 4.9 Medium
The eHRD CTMS developed by Sunnet has an Arbitrary File Reading vulnerability, allowing remote attackers with administrator privileges to exploit Relative Path Traversal to download arbitrary system files.
CVE-2025-9567 2 Sun.net, Sunnet 2 Ehrd Ctms, Ehrd Ctms 2025-09-25 6.1 Medium
The eHRD developed by Sunnet has a Reflected Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript codes in user's browser through phishing attacks.
CVE-2025-9569 2 Sun.net, Sunnet 2 Ehrd Ctms, Ehrd Ctms 2025-09-25 6.1 Medium
The eHRD developed by Sunnet has a Reflected Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript codes in user's browser through phishing attacks.
CVE-2024-10440 2 Sun.net, Sunnet 2 Ehrd Ctms, Ehrd Ctms 2025-09-25 9.8 Critical
The eHDR CTMS from Sunnet has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL command to read, modify, and delete database contents.
CVE-2024-10439 2 Sun.net, Sunnet 2 Ehrd Ctms, Ehrd Ctms 2025-09-25 5.3 Medium
The eHRD CTMS from Sunnet has an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to modify a specific parameter to access arbitrary files uploaded by any user.
CVE-2024-10438 2 Sun.net, Sunnet 2 Ehrd Ctms, Ehrd Ctms 2025-09-25 7.5 High
The eHRD CTMS from Sunnet has an Authentication Bypass vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication by satisfying specific conditions in order to access certain functionalities.
CVE-2025-7976 1 Anritsu 1 Shockline 2025-09-24 N/A
Anritsu ShockLine CHX File Parsing Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Anritsu ShockLine. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of CHX files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-26882.
CVE-2025-7975 1 Anritsu 1 Shockline 2025-09-24 N/A
Anritsu ShockLine CHX File Parsing Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Anritsu ShockLine. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of CHX files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-26913.
CVE-2024-50390 1 Qnap 1 Qurouter 2025-09-24 9.8 Critical
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QHora. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuRouter 2.4.5.032 and later