| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| STDU Viewer 1.6.375 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted .xps file, related to a "User Mode Write AV starting at Unknown Symbol @ 0x000000000479049b called from Unknown Symbol @ 0x000000000d89645b." |
| STDU Viewer 1.6.375 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted .xps file, related to an "Illegal Instruction Violation starting at Unknown Symbol @ 0x0000000002d8024c called from STDUXPSFile!DllUnregisterServer+0x000000000002566c." |
| Pixie 1.0.4 allows an admin/index.php s=settings&x= XSS attack. |
| A privilege escalation in Fortinet FortiClient Windows 5.4.3 and earlier as well as 5.6.0 allows attacker to gain privilege via exploiting the Windows "security alert" dialog thereby popping up when the "VPN before logon" feature is enabled and an untrusted certificate chain. |
| STDU Viewer 1.6.375 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted .xps file, related to an "Error Code (0xe06d7363) starting at wow64!Wow64NotifyDebugger+0x000000000000001d." |
| STDU Viewer 1.6.375 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted .xps file, related to an "Illegal Instruction Violation starting at Unknown Symbol @ 0x00000000048c024d called from STDUXPSFile!DllUnregisterServer+0x0000000000025638." |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engine render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." |
| An OS Command Injection vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWLC 6.1-2 through 6.1-5, 7.0-7 through 7.0-10, 8.0 through 8.2, and 8.3.0 through 8.3.2 file management AP script download webUI page allows an authenticated admin user to execute arbitrary system console commands via crafted HTTP requests. |
| STDU Viewer 1.6.375 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted .djvu file, related to a "Possible Stack Corruption starting at STDUDjVuFile!DllUnregisterServer+0x000000000000d908." |
| STDU Viewer 1.6.375 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted .djvu file, related to a "User Mode Write AV starting at STDUDjVuFile!DllUnregisterServer+0x00000000000085f5." |
| STDU Viewer 1.6.375 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted .djvu file, related to a "User Mode Write AV starting at STDUDjVuFile!DllUnregisterServer+0x000000000000854d." |
| AdminPanel in AfterLogic WebMail 7.7 and Aurora 7.7.5 has XSS via the txtDomainName field to adminpanel/modules/pro/inc/ajax.php during addition of a domain. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. |
| An improper Access Control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal versions 4.0.0 and below allows an attacker to interact with unauthorized VDOMs or enumerate other ADOMs via another user's stolen session and CSRF tokens or the adomName parameter in the /fpc/sec/customer/policy/getAdomVersion request. |
| Microsoft Edge allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy for HTML elements in other browser windows, aka "Microsoft Edge Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0066 and CVE-2017-0135. |
| WP_Admin_UI in the Crony Cronjob Manager plugin before 0.4.7 for WordPress has CSRF via the name parameter in an action=manage&do=create operation, as demonstrated by inserting XSS sequences. |
| The TIFFSetProfiles function in coders/tiff.c in ImageMagick 7.0.6 has incorrect expectations about whether LibTIFF TIFFGetField return values imply that data validation has occurred, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free after an invalid call to TIFFSetField, and application crash) via a crafted file. |
| A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWLC 6.1-x (6.1-2, 6.1-4 and 6.1-5); 7.0-x (7.0-7, 7.0-8, 7.0-9, 7.0-10); and 8.x (8.0, 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3.0-8.3.2) allows an authenticated user to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via non-sanitized parameters "refresh" and "branchtotable" present in HTTP POST requests. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. |
