Search
Search Results (11 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-17693 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-31 | N/A |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-16527 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-07-31 | 7.3 High |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass access controls by sending crafted requests to the PCP pmproxy /store endpoint. This allows the attacker to overwrite any PMDA metric, leading to arbitrary code execution and system takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17780 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-31 | 6.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Isolated Web Apps in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-17842 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to bypass same origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14317 | 2 Givewp, Wordpress | 2 Givewp, Wordpress | 2026-07-31 | 5.3 Medium |
| The GiveWP WordPress plugin before 4.16.3 does not restrict the set of available payment gateways to those enabled by the administrator, deriving it in part from request input, which allows unauthenticated users to complete donations through a payment gateway the administrator has disabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14928 | 2026-07-31 | N/A | ||
| The JS Help Desk WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not perform authorization or ownership checks before returning support-ticket content in a nonce-gated search handler, allowing any authenticated user (Subscriber and above) to read the subject and full message body of every other user's support tickets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12251 | 2 Ultimatemember, Wordpress | 2 Ultimate Member, Wordpress | 2026-07-31 | 8.1 High |
| The Ultimate Member WordPress plugin before 2.12.1 does not filter administrator-level capabilities from the roles it makes selectable on its registration forms, and its post-registration safeguard against elevated accounts is disabled by default, allowing unauthenticated users to register with a site-defined role that carries administrator capabilities and gain administrative access, when such a role exists and a role-selection field is present on a published registration form. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12376 | 2 Academylms, Wordpress | 2 Academy Lms, Wordpress | 2026-07-31 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Academy LMS WordPress plugin through 3.8.2 does not restrict access to quiz attempt records to their owner, allowing any authenticated user with subscriber-level access and above (enrolled in any single course) to read every user's quiz attempts across the whole site, including personal data such as IP addresses, names, registration dates and quiz results. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14919 | 2026-07-31 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The ShopMonitor.io WordPress plugin before 1.2.0 does not properly restrict its email-rerouting test mode, gating it behind a trusted-source check that is satisfiable with client-supplied request headers, allowing unauthenticated attackers to redirect outgoing emails, including the WordPress administrator password-reset email, to an address they control and take over the administrator account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14538 | 2026-07-31 | N/A | ||
| An improper authorization and security-boundary bypass vulnerability in the bigquery-execute-sql tool component of Google mcp-toolbox versions 0.16.1 through 1.4.0 allows an authenticated attacker to bypass allowedDatasets validation checks. The toolbox relies on the BigQuery dry-run API to enforce dataset restrictions, but due to a fail-open logic flaw, it bypasses validation when the API returns an empty array for specialized constructs. This allows the attacker to extract structural DDL schemas for explicitly excluded datasets via INFORMATION_SCHEMA, and access downstream federated row data via EXTERNAL_QUERY connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33186 | 1 Grpc | 2 Grpc, Grpc-go | 2026-04-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omitted the mandatory leading slash (e.g., `Service/Method` instead of `/Service/Method`). While the server successfully routed these requests to the correct handler, authorization interceptors (including the official `grpc/authz` package) evaluated the raw, non-canonical path string. Consequently, "deny" rules defined using canonical paths (starting with `/`) failed to match the incoming request, allowing it to bypass the policy if a fallback "allow" rule was present. This affects gRPC-Go servers that use path-based authorization interceptors, such as the official RBAC implementation in `google.golang.org/grpc/authz` or custom interceptors relying on `info.FullMethod` or `grpc.Method(ctx)`; AND that have a security policy contains specific "deny" rules for canonical paths but allows other requests by default (a fallback "allow" rule). The vulnerability is exploitable by an attacker who can send raw HTTP/2 frames with malformed `:path` headers directly to the gRPC server. The fix in version 1.79.3 ensures that any request with a `:path` that does not start with a leading slash is immediately rejected with a `codes.Unimplemented` error, preventing it from reaching authorization interceptors or handlers with a non-canonical path string. While upgrading is the most secure and recommended path, users can mitigate the vulnerability using one of the following methods: Use a validating interceptor (recommended mitigation); infrastructure-level normalization; and/or policy hardening. | ||||
Page 1 of 1.