| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Dell PowerScale InsightIQ, versions 6.3.0 through 6.4.0, contains an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges and Information tampering. |
| Edito CMS is vulnerable to improper cryptographic signature verification in the JWT refresh logic. An authenticated low-privilege user can submit self-crafted JWT containing an existing user identifier and, due to the lack of signature validation, obtain a valid, fully-signed session token for any account in the system. This allows the attacker to impersonate any user, including administrators.
This issue was fixed in version 5.10.2607. Hotfixes for older versions (5.8) have also been released. |
| Improper state validation in ANGLE in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| SOGo before 5.12.13 contains an improper cryptographic signature verification vulnerability that allows remote attackers to replace a victim's contact S/MIME certificate by sending a spoofed multipart/signed message with a mismatched signature and an impersonated From address. Attackers can deliver a crafted CMS signedData object containing their own self-signed certificate, which SOGo's UIxMailView stores on the contact card without validating signature authenticity or certificate identity, enabling subsequent encrypted communications to be decrypted with the attacker's private key. |
| Missing authorization in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| Missing authorization in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| Improper input validation in Core in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a local attacker to bypass web origin policy via a co-installed app. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| Incorrect authorization in Layout in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to obtain cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| Missing authorization in ImageCapture in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| Improper authentication in Bootgen could result in the use of a fixed salt value for RSA padding instead of a randomly generated salt, potentially impacting data integrity. |
| A flaw was found in sequoia-openpgp. The library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, leading to a discrepancy in how key capabilities are viewed. This key flag confusion allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. Consequently, an attacker can illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to their own certificate and forge signatures, completely compromising cryptographic integrity. |
| The Symfony FrameworkBundle framework.trusted_proxies option and the HttpFoundation Request::setTrustedProxies() method trust remote clients as reverse proxies when the private_ranges shortcut is used, allowing remote attackers to spoof the client IP address, host and scheme in Symfony FrameworkBundle versions 7.1 prior to 7.4.23 and 8.x prior to 8.1.11, and HttpFoundation versions 7.2 prior to 7.4.23 and 8.x prior to 8.1.11. The private_ranges and PRIVATE_SUBNETS keywords resolved to IpUtils::PRIVATE_SUBNETS, the deny list of NoPrivateNetworkHttpClient, which lists the private and special-purpose prefixes a server must not connect to. Since the fix for CVE-2026-48736 (7.4.13 and 8.0.13), this list also covers the IPv6 prefixes that embed an IPv4 address: IPv4-mapped (::ffff:0:0/96), IPv4-compatible (::/96), 6to4 (2002::/16), Teredo (2001::/32) and NAT64 (64:ff9b::/96). The IPv4-mapped entry has been in the list since the private_ranges shortcut was introduced, in 7.1 for framework.trusted_proxies and in 7.2 for Request::setTrustedProxies(). Over-blocking is safe for a deny list, but when the same entries are used as the allow list of trusted proxies, they trust remote clients. A client whose connection arrives with such a source address is treated as a reverse proxy, and the X-Forwarded-For, X-Forwarded-Host, X-Forwarded-Proto, X-Forwarded-Port and X-Forwarded-Prefix headers it sends are honoured. For example, with Request::setTrustedProxies(['private_ranges'], ...), a request with REMOTE_ADDR set to ::ffff:203.0.113.7 and the headers X-Forwarded-For: 10.0.0.9, X-Forwarded-Host: evil.example.com and X-Forwarded-Proto: https makes getClientIp() return 10.0.0.9, getHost() return evil.example.com and isSecure() return true. Two kinds of deployments are exposed: a server listening on the IPv6 wildcard address without IPV6_V6ONLY reports every IPv4 client in the IPv4-mapped form, so every client is trusted, and a server reachable over IPv6 trusts any client sourcing from 6to4 or Teredo space, which is globally routed, whatever its listener. A spoofed client address defeats IP allow lists, rate limiting and audit logs; a spoofed host poisons the URLs written into password reset and login link e-mails and into shared caches; a spoofed scheme satisfies requires_channel: https over plain HTTP. Symfony 6.4 does not point any trusted proxy setting at IpUtils::PRIVATE_SUBNETS and is not affected by default, but an application that passes that constant to Request::setTrustedProxies() itself could be exposed in the same way on any version. This issue is fixed in 7.4.23 and 8.1.11. |
| Insufficient verification of data authenticity may allow a local attacker to bypass Secure Debug Unlock (SDU), potentially resulting in unauthorized debug access. |
| If an attacker was able to perform a man-in-the-middle attack on an SMTP or POP3 server connection using STARTTLS, the attacker could inject server responses before the TLS handshake completed. Thunderbird would process these responses after the handshake, as if they had been received from the server over the encrypted connection. This could be used to make Thunderbird report a different outcome for sending or fetching mail, and to show attacker-controlled text in error messages. The encrypted connection itself was not compromised, and credentials were not exposed. Connections using SSL/TLS instead of STARTTLS were not affected. This vulnerability was fixed in Thunderbird 160 and Thunderbird 153.7. |
| Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.3, ed25519.verify() decodes a public key in crypto_sign_open() without rejecting small-order points or their non-canonical encodings. With S = 0 and a small-order R value, an attacker who can choose the public key can produce signatures that verify for many messages, or all messages with the identity key, without a private key. This can defeat proof-of-possession, attribution, non-repudiation, or deduplication checks that rely on a signature being bound to the message. Keys produced by normal Ed25519 key generation are not small-order, so applications that verify only trusted or internally generated public keys are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.3. |
| CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
