In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915: fix incorrect RCU teardown order
i915_gem_busy_ioctl uses dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked() to iterate
over the fences in an GEM object without holding a reference but only
the RCU read side lock.
What can happen here is that the GEM object is destroyed concurrently
while i915_gem_busy_ioctl is still running. This won't free the GEM
objects memory, but still drops all the dma_fence references.
Now when dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked() sees a destroyed dma_fence it
assumes that a new fence list was installed and re-starts the loop.
But in the case of a destroyed GEM object a new fence list is never
installed, only the old one freed and therefore the iteration never
finishes resulting in an endless loop.
The solution is to drop the fence references only after the RCU grace
period.
The fixes tag is not necessary the patch introducing the problem, but the
one making it so worse that we need to address it.
This problem was pointed out by Sashiko-bot.
(cherry picked from commit 5113479556025093bf8133bb2dcaa33be2d50921)
drm/i915: fix incorrect RCU teardown order
i915_gem_busy_ioctl uses dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked() to iterate
over the fences in an GEM object without holding a reference but only
the RCU read side lock.
What can happen here is that the GEM object is destroyed concurrently
while i915_gem_busy_ioctl is still running. This won't free the GEM
objects memory, but still drops all the dma_fence references.
Now when dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked() sees a destroyed dma_fence it
assumes that a new fence list was installed and re-starts the loop.
But in the case of a destroyed GEM object a new fence list is never
installed, only the old one freed and therefore the iteration never
finishes resulting in an endless loop.
The solution is to drop the fence references only after the RCU grace
period.
The fixes tag is not necessary the patch introducing the problem, but the
one making it so worse that we need to address it.
This problem was pointed out by Sashiko-bot.
(cherry picked from commit 5113479556025093bf8133bb2dcaa33be2d50921)
Advisories
No advisories yet.
Fixes
Solution
No solution given by the vendor.
Workaround
No workaround given by the vendor.
References
History
Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Weaknesses | CWE-362 CWE-416 |
Sun, 18 Oct 2026 15:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/i915: fix incorrect RCU teardown order i915_gem_busy_ioctl uses dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked() to iterate over the fences in an GEM object without holding a reference but only the RCU read side lock. What can happen here is that the GEM object is destroyed concurrently while i915_gem_busy_ioctl is still running. This won't free the GEM objects memory, but still drops all the dma_fence references. Now when dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked() sees a destroyed dma_fence it assumes that a new fence list was installed and re-starts the loop. But in the case of a destroyed GEM object a new fence list is never installed, only the old one freed and therefore the iteration never finishes resulting in an endless loop. The solution is to drop the fence references only after the RCU grace period. The fixes tag is not necessary the patch introducing the problem, but the one making it so worse that we need to address it. This problem was pointed out by Sashiko-bot. (cherry picked from commit 5113479556025093bf8133bb2dcaa33be2d50921) | |
| Title | drm/i915: fix incorrect RCU teardown order | |
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| References |
|
|
Projects
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2026-10-19T09:21:03.153Z
Reserved: 2026-09-25T10:25:14.355Z
Link: CVE-2026-98521
No data.
Status : Received
Published: 2026-10-18T16:17:03.473
Modified: 2026-10-19T10:19:06.040
Link: CVE-2026-98521
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
Updated: 2026-10-19T02:00:09Z