Export limit exceeded: 11132 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11132 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-123092 | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High | ||
| The WP Remote Users Sync WordPress plugin before 2.3.0 does not restrict which user metadata keys may be written through its incoming user synchronisation requests, allowing a site that holds the shared synchronisation keys to set the capabilities of any existing account and escalate it to administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16135 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| The VibeBP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.9.8.1. This is due to the plugin allowing arbitrary user meta updates through the set_email_notification_settings() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to grant themselves administrator privileges by updating their own 'wp_capabilities' user meta value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15309 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| The CourseCure Courses plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in versions up to, and including, 1.5.1. This is due to a missing capability check in the ajax_save_settings() function, which accepts arbitrary POST parameters and calls update_option() with attacker-controlled keys and values without any authorization verification. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to elevate their privileges to administrator by setting the default_role WordPress option to 'administrator' and users_can_register to '1', then registering a new account that is automatically granted full administrator access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55316 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In handle_dpm_image of seclib.rs, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56929 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In TrustyKeyMintManager::VerifyHat of trusty_keymint_manager.cc, there is a possible Security check bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59606 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In multiple functions of sswrp_cpm.dtsi, there is a possible way to modify global reset registers from non-secure software due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59597 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In bindDataService of DataServiceManager.java, there is a possible way to retain privileged tunnel management permissions across configuration updates due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55319 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In thread_free of thread.c, there is a possible way to corrupt kernel heap metadata on thread creation failure due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57036 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In send_vdu_directive of gdmc/gsp/dev/bmsm/plat/lga/vdu.c, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58677 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In get_secure_boot_mode of auth.rs, there is a possible way to bypass root signature verification via fault injection due to a logic error. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59637 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In userdata_report of hwcodec_firmware, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57009 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In GC2AvcDec of GC2AvcDec.cpp, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58736 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In NotifySipResponse of SessionEx.cpp, there is a possible way to corrupt memory via a dangling connection pointer in the pending response queue due to a use after free. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56884 | 2026-11-12 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| In ac_set_ns_ipa_tbl of plat_trusty.c, there is a possible way to corrupt stream table entry configurations via unvalidated parameters due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56926 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In multiple functions of PssSubscriptionManager.java, there is a possible way to spoof subscription switch results and trigger a device reboot due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126785 | 1 Rmalright | 1 Tr-vision Home | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in rmalright TR-VISION HOME 2.0.5. Impacted is the function sub_11504 in the library WFanManager.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. Such manipulation leads to incorrect default permissions. The attack must be carried out locally. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126872 | 2026-11-11 | 8.8 High | ||
| Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-67543 | 2026-11-11 | 8.8 High | ||
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, heym hardens one untrusted-code path but not its sibling. The Python tool executor (python_tool_executor.py) treats user code as untrusted and mandates a Docker sandbox (no network, read-only fs, non-root, no docker socket), failing closed. The skill executor (skill_python_executor.py) runs skill Python via a local backend subprocess with no Docker isolation — only a 512 MB RLIMIT and a 7-key env denylist — so a skill executes inside the backend execution context, with filesystem access, network egress, and non-denylisted environment variables that should not be exposed to untrusted/shared skills. In the shipped Docker config (backend runs as root + /var/run/docker.sock mounted), this escalates to host root. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67541 | 2026-11-11 | 8.1 High | ||
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, team-member management (add / remove / update) is gated only on team membership, not on the team creator/admin role — and TeamMember has no role column. Any non-creator member can seat an attacker account into the team; because credential team-shares are scoped only by TeamMember.user_id, the newly-added attacker can then decrypt every credential shared into that team (provider API keys, OAuth tokens. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126249 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 7.2 High |
| A improper privilege management vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate privileges. | ||||