Export limit exceeded: 375571 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (375571 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-12667 | 1 Ibm | 1 Mq | 2026-09-15 | 7.1 High |
| IBM MQ 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.37 LTS, 9.2.0.0 through 9.2.0.43 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.41 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.5.1 CD, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.25 LTS, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.5.1 CD, and 10.0.0.0 could allow an authenticated attacker to read files from a vulnerable .NET client or cause limited denial of service due to improper handling of XML external entities in RFH2 folder parsing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12351 | 1 Ibm | 1 Mq | 2026-09-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM MQ 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.41 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.5.1 CD, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.25 LTS, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.5.1 LTS, and 10.0.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to unsafe JNDI lookup processing when the IVT application is deployed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11864 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak For Business Automation | 2026-09-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 26.0.0 through 26.0.0 Interim Fix 001, 25.0.0 through 25.0.0 Interim Fix 005, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 Interim Fix 008, and 24.0.0 through 24.0.0 Interim Fix 009 is vulnerable to an XPath injection vulnerability, which could allow an authenticated attacker to exfiltrate sensitive application data and/or determine the structure of the XML document. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11728 | 1 Ibm | 1 Mq | 2026-09-15 | 8.1 High |
| IBM MQ 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.37 LTS, 9.2.0.0 through 9.2.0.43 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.41 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.5.1 CD, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.25 LTS, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.5.1 CD, and 10.0.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code in the client due to a heap buffer overflow when receiving messages from a malicious queue manager or through a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54084 | 1 Wazuh | 1 Wazuh | 2026-09-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Wazuh is an open-source security platform providing unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.14.6, a malicious or man-in-the-middle enrollment manager can crash a Wazuh agent during enrollment by returning a malformed key response with fewer than four fields, causing a NULL pointer dereference. The w_enrollment_process_agent_key() routine splits the manager-provided key into four space-separated fields but does not verify that all fields are present before passing them to validators. Because OS_StrBreak() leaves missing trailing entries as NULL and OS_IsValidName() calls strlen() on its argument without a NULL check, a response such as OSSEC K:'1' reaches OS_IsValidName(NULL) and terminates the agent process. Since Wazuh permits enrollment against an unverified manager when no CA certificate is configured, an attacker operating a rogue manager or intercepting the enrollment flow can deterministically crash agents, resulting in denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81898 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-15 | N/A |
| In Concrete CMS below version 9.5.3, the Address attribute's country-less text formatter skipped HTML-escaping, enabling stored XSS in Express association views. A user able to submit an Address attribute could execute script in the session of any dashboard user who opened the affected entry. The unescaped branch was reachable because a non-required Address attribute accepted a blank country, and because several Express association templates (for example concrete/elements/express/form/view/dashboard/association.php) echoed the association label mask without applying h(). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 7.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori from Tenzai for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54085 | 1 Wazuh | 1 Wazuh | 2026-09-15 | 7.1 High |
| Wazuh is an open-source security platform providing unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. In versions 4.2.0 through 4.14.6, multiple active response scripts pass attacker-influenced alert fields to privileged system commands without validating their format, allowing argument injection into tools that run as root. Five of the eight scripts that handle the srcip field, route-null.c, netsh.c, pf.c, npf.c, and ipfw.c, omit the get_ip_version() check that rejects non-IP input, and disable-account.c passes the dstuser field to passwd/chuser with only a comparison against "root". An attacker who can inject crafted log events, for example via syslog, can supply srcip or dstuser values that, when an active response rule triggers, are passed unvalidated to firewall and account-management commands such as pfctl, npfctl, ipfw, route, netsh, and passwd. This enables injecting additional command arguments, and on Windows the unquoted CreateProcess command-line concatenation in wpopenv() lets a srcip containing spaces add further arguments, while disable-account.c can be abused to lock arbitrary system accounts. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61783 | 1 Wazuh | 1 Wazuh | 2026-09-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Wazuh is an open-source security platform providing unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. In versions 4.14.0 through 4.14.6, an authenticated low-privilege user can read the cluster secret from the manager configuration because the logic that masks sensitive values is disabled by any update-config RBAC rule, including an explicit deny. The mask_sensitive_config() decorator applies masking only when _has_update_permissions() returns false, but that gate treats a user as able to update the config whenever a manager:update_config or cluster:update_config rule exists, without ever checking whether the rule's effect is allow or deny. Because a deny rule is stored as a real entry, a read-only account that is hardened by explicitly denying config edits is counted as having update permission, which turns masking off. A single authenticated GET request to the configuration endpoint with raw=true then returns the verbatim ossec.conf XML with cluster.key in clear, whereas an otherwise identical account without the deny rule sees the value masked. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61800 | 1 Wazuh | 1 Wazuh | 2026-09-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Wazuh is an open-source security platform providing unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. In versions 4.4.0 through 4.14.6, a party holding the cluster key can write, overwrite, or delete arbitrary files under /var/ossec on worker nodes, leading to remote code execution as root. During cluster file synchronization, the non-merged branch of update_master_files_in_worker() moves each staged file to a destination derived only from safe_join(), which confines the path to /var/ossec but never verifies that the file lands in the directory declared by its cluster_item_key. Because the destination check present on the primary node and on the worker's merged branch was not applied, a peer can place files at attacker-chosen locations under /var/ossec, including paths that are executed as root, and the delete branch has the same gap. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-30893, which addressed traversal outside /var/ossec but left this path able to redirect files anywhere within it. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61802 | 1 Wazuh | 1 Wazuh | 2026-09-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Wazuh is an open-source security platform providing unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. In versions 4.14.0 through 4.14.6, a low-privilege API user can read the cleartext cluster key from a configuration endpoint that fails to redact it. The REST API provides a masking control, mask_sensitive_config, that redacts sensitive fields such as authd.pass and cluster.key from configuration responses for users who lack update-config permission, and every config-read endpoint carries this decorator except GET /cluster/local/config. That endpoint, backed by read_config_wrapper, is gated only by cluster:read and returns the local node's cluster configuration including the cleartext key, whereas its siblings return the same value masked. As a result, any account with the default readonly or cluster_readonly role, which is explicitly denied update-config precisely so it cannot view secrets, receives the real cluster key. Because the cluster key authenticates and encrypts traffic between cluster nodes, disclosing it to an unprivileged account provides the authentication precondition for the cluster-peer remote code execution chains established by prior advisories. This issue is fixed in version 4.14. | ||||
| CVE-2026-52098 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-09-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in Flowise 3.1.2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the /api/v1/prediction/<flowId> endpoint | ||||
| CVE-2026-90534 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-09-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Flowise is a low-code platform for building LLM applications. In versions up to and including 3.1.3, the POST /api/v1/node-load-method/:name endpoint is mounted without any route-level permission check and invokes component loadMethods with an attacker-controlled nodeName, loadMethod, inputs, and credential value. The selected credential is resolved by raw Credential.id via getCredentialData() and decrypted without verifying Credential.workspaceId against the caller's active or shared workspace, unlike other credential read paths which are workspace-scoped. As a result, an authenticated low-privilege user (or workspace API key) in one workspace can supply a credential ID owned by another workspace and cause Flowise to act as a confused deputy, performing third-party provider calls with the victim workspace's credential and returning provider metadata to the attacker. Statically identified affected load methods include Google Drive listFiles, Google Sheets listSpreadsheets, and AWS DynamoDB KV Storage listTables. The raw credential secret itself is not returned to the attacker. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-52023 | 1 Kamailio | 1 Kamailio | 2026-09-15 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in kamailio v.6.1.1 and before allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the ims_registrar_pcscf module, specifically the pcscf_save_pending/save_pending path and security-agreement parsing in sec_agree.c:parse_sec_agree() | ||||
| CVE-2026-90535 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-09-15 | 7.5 High |
| Flowise versions before 3.1.4 contain an unauthenticated denial of service vulnerability in the /api/v1/text-to-speech/abort endpoint that accepts user-supplied chatflowId and chatId without ownership verification. Attackers can terminate active chatflow predictions for any user by submitting requests with known chatflow and chat identifiers, causing targeted service disruption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69214 | 2026-09-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Http4s is a Scala interface for HTTP services. Prior to 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47, The CookieJar client middleware stores a response cookie’s Domain attribute without checking that it domain-matches the host that supplied the cookie or rejecting public suffixes. A malicious or compromised server contacted through the same CookieJar can plant a cookie for another domain, and the jar later sends that cookie to the victim domain, enabling session fixation or overwriting security-sensitive cookies. The patch validates the Set-Cookie domain against the response origin, although public-suffix rejection remains unimplemented. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67631 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Sql Server 2017, Sql Server 2019, Sql Server 2022 and 1 more | 2026-09-15 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67393 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2022 (gdr) and 5 more | 2026-09-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Buffer over-read in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73750 | 2 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 157 Aos-cx, Aruba Cx 10000-48y6c \(r8p13a\), Aruba Cx 10000-48y6c \(r8p14a\) and 154 more | 2026-09-15 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerabilities exist in the authentication module that may improperly process malformed or truncated input. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by providing specially crafted input from a compromised or hostile authentication server. Successful exploitation could result in a Denial-of-Service or potential remote code execution with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90651 | 1 Socketdev | 1 Firewall | 2026-09-15 | 8.1 High |
| Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in registry mode before 2.0.0 does not verify upstream TLS certificates by default. When the api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify configuration keys are omitted from socket.yml, the generated configuration sets SOCKET_API_SSL_VERIFY='false' and UPSTREAM_SSL_VERIFY='false', and the OpenResty/Lua HTTP client used for outbound requests accepts any certificate, including self-signed and otherwise untrusted certificates, without validating the chain. An attacker positioned to intercept traffic between Socket Firewall and the Socket API or an upstream package registry can present a crafted certificate and modify responses in transit, including substituting malicious package content or altering the allow/block decisions the firewall enforces. Setting api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true enables verification; however, in versions before 1.1.334, the generated nginx configuration did not emit lua_ssl_trusted_certificate, and thus verification could not be used successfully without manually patching the generated configuration. Version 2.0.0 changes the default for both settings to true. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90679 | 1 Forgejo | 1 Forgejo | 2026-09-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Forgejo 13.0.0 through 16.0.4, when "[federation] ENABLED = true" is set, has a spoofing issue that affects identity integrity but does not allow account takeover or content modification. It does not verify that the HTTP Signature on an incoming ActivityPub activity was produced by the key belonging to the actor named in the activity body. The signature verification in routers/api/v1/activitypub/reqsignature.go validates the request signature, but the inbox activity handlers subsequently read the acting identity from the attacker-controlled JSON body without binding it to the verified signing key. Additionally, the signed Digest header is not recomputed against the received request body. A remote attacker who hosts a single valid ActivityPub actor and keypair can therefore submit signature-valid activities attributed to any actor identity they name. | ||||