Export limit exceeded: 43050 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 43050 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (43050 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-12431 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 15.5 before 17.5.5, 17.6 before 17.6.3, and 17.7 before 17.7.1, in which unauthorized users could manipulate the status of issues in public projects. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6324 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 15.7 prior to 17.5.5, starting from 17.6 prior to 17.6.3, and starting from 17.7 prior to 17.7.1. It was possible to trigger a DoS by creating cyclic references between epics. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13041 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-08-05 | 4.2 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 16.4 prior to 17.5.5, starting from 17.6 prior to 17.6.3, and starting from 17.7 prior to 17.7.1. When a user is created via the SAML provider, the external groups setting overrides the external provider configuration. As a result, the user may not be marked as external thereby giving those users access to internal projects or groups. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20214 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2025-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the Network Configuration Access Control Module (NACM) of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain unauthorized read access to configuration or operational data. This vulnerability exists because a subtle change in inner API call behavior causes results to be filtered incorrectly. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using either NETCONF, RESTCONF, or gRPC Network Management Interface (gNMI) protocols and query data on paths that may have been denied by the NACM configuration. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access data that should have been restricted according to the NACM configuration. Note: This vulnerability requires that the attacker obtain the credentials from a valid user with privileges lower than 15, and that NACM was configured to provide restricted read access for that user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20189 | 1 Cisco | 2 Asr 903, Ios Xe | 2025-08-05 | 7.4 High |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Express Forwarding functionality of Cisco IOS XE Software for Cisco ASR 903 Aggregation Services Routers with Route Switch Processor 3 (RSP3C) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to trigger a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper memory management when Cisco IOS XE Software is processing Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted ARP messages at a high rate over a period of time to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust system resources, which eventually triggers a reload of the active route switch processor (RSP). If a redundant RSP is not present, the router reloads. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20151 | 1 Cisco | 4 Cisco Ios, Ios, Ios Xe and 1 more | 2025-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the implementation of the Simple Network Management Protocol Version 3 (SNMPv3) feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to poll an affected device using SNMP, even if the device is configured to deny SNMP traffic from an unauthorized source or the SNMPv3 username is removed from the configuration. This vulnerability exists because of the way that the SNMPv3 configuration is stored in the Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software startup configuration. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by polling an affected device from a source address that should have been denied. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform SNMP operations from a source that should be denied. Note: The attacker has no control of the SNMPv3 configuration. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid SNMPv3 user credentials. For more information, see the section of this advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20137 | 1 Cisco | 41 Catalyst 1000-16fp-2g-l, Catalyst 1000-16p-2g-l, Catalyst 1000-16t-2g-l and 38 more | 2025-08-05 | 4.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the access control list (ACL) programming of Cisco IOS Software that is running on Cisco Catalyst 1000 Switches and Cisco Catalyst 2960L Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured ACL. This vulnerability is due to the use of both an IPv4 ACL and a dynamic ACL of IP Source Guard on the same interface, which is an unsupported configuration. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by attempting to send traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass an ACL on the affected device. Note: Cisco documentation has been updated to reflect that this is an unsupported configuration. However, Cisco is publishing this advisory because the device will not prevent an administrator from configuring both features on the same interface. There are no plans to implement the ability to configure both features on the same interface on Cisco Catalyst 1000 or Catalyst 2960L Switches. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30665 | 1 Zoom | 5 Meeting Software Development Kit, Rooms, Rooms Controller and 2 more | 2025-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| NULL pointer dereference in some Zoom Workplace Apps for Windows may allow an authenticated user to conduct a denial of service via network access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30666 | 1 Zoom | 5 Meeting Software Development Kit, Rooms, Rooms Controller and 2 more | 2025-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| NULL pointer dereference in some Zoom Workplace Apps for Windows may allow an authenticated user to conduct a denial of service via network access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20181 | 1 Cisco | 44 Catalyst 2960cx-8pc-l, Catalyst 2960cx-8tc-l, Catalyst 2960x-24pd-l and 41 more | 2025-08-04 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in Cisco IOS Software for Cisco Catalyst 2960X, 2960XR, 2960CX, and 3560CX Series Switches could allow an authenticated, local attacker with privilege level 15 or an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device to execute persistent code at boot time and break the chain of trust. This vulnerability is due to missing signature verification for specific files that may be loaded during the device boot process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by placing a crafted file into a specific location on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code at boot time. Because this allows the attacker to bypass a major security feature of the device, Cisco has raised the Security Impact Rating (SIR) of this advisory from Medium to High. | ||||
| CVE-2020-25412 | 1 Gnuplot | 1 Gnuplot | 2025-08-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| com_line() in command.c in gnuplot 5.4 leads to an out-of-bounds-write from strncpy() that may lead to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0825 | 1 Yhirose | 1 Cpp-httplib | 2025-08-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| cpp-httplib version v0.17.3 through v0.18.3 fails to filter CRLF characters ("\r\n") when those are prefixed with a null byte. This enables attackers to exploit CRLF injection that could further lead to HTTP Response Splitting, XSS, and more. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20157 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager | 2025-08-04 | 5.9 Medium |
| A vulnerability in certificate validation processing of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly Cisco SD-WAN vManage, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive information. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of certificates that are used by the Smart Licensing feature. An attacker with a privileged network position could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting traffic that is sent over the Internet. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain access to sensitive information, including credentials used by the device to connect to Cisco cloud services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20187 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager | 2025-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the application data endpoints of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly Cisco SD-WAN vManage, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to write arbitrary files to an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of requests to APIs. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious requests to an API within the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct directory traversal attacks and write files to an arbitrary location on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20145 | 1 Cisco | 10 8608, 8804, 8808 and 7 more | 2025-08-04 | 5.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the access control list (ACL) processing in the egress direction of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured ACL. This vulnerability exists because certain packets are handled incorrectly when they are received on an ingress interface on one line card and destined out of an egress interface on another line card where the egress ACL is configured. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by attempting to send traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass an egress ACL on the affected device. For more information about this vulnerability, see the section of this advisory. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20144 | 1 Cisco | 40 Ios Xr, Ios Xr Software, Ncs 540-12z20g-sys-a and 37 more | 2025-08-04 | 4 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the hybrid access control list (ACL) processing of IPv4 packets in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured ACL. This vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of packets when a specific configuration of the hybrid ACL exists. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by attempting to send traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a configured ACL on the affected device. For more information, see the section of this advisory. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53928 | 1 Maxkb | 1 Maxkb | 2025-08-02 | 4.6 Medium |
| MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Prior to versions 1.10.9-lts and 2.0.0, a Remote Command Execution vulnerability exists in the MCP call. Versions 1.10.9-lts and 2.0.0 fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53927 | 1 Maxkb | 1 Maxkb | 2025-08-02 | 4.6 Medium |
| MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Prior to version 2.0.0, the sandbox design rules can be bypassed because MaxKB only restricts the execution permissions of files in a specific directory. Therefore, an attacker can use the `shutil.copy2` method in Python to copy the command they want to execute to the executable directory. This bypasses directory restrictions and reverse shell. Version 2.0.0 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6993 | 1 Rustaurius | 1 Ultimate Wp Mail | 2025-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| The Ultimate WP Mail plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to improper authorization within the get_email_log_details() AJAX handler in versions 1.0.17 to 1.3.6. The handler reads the client-supplied post_id and retrieves the corresponding email log post content (including the password-reset link), relying only on the ‘edit_posts’ capability without restricting to administrators or validating ownership. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to harvest an admin’s reset link and elevate their privileges to administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30483 | 1 Dell | 2 Elastic Cloud Storage, Objectscale | 2025-08-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| Dell ECS versions prior to 3.8.1.5/ ObjectScale version 4.0.0.0 contains an Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | ||||