Export limit exceeded: 37214 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (37214 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-25152 | 1 Itarian | 2 On-premise, Saas Service Desk | 2025-03-11 | 9.9 Critical |
| The ITarian platform (SAAS / on-premise) offers the possibility to run code on agents via a function called procedures. It is possible to require a mandatory approval process. Due to a vulnerability in the approval process, present in any version prior to 6.35.37347.20040, a malicious actor (with a valid session token) can create a procedure, bypass approval, and execute the procedure. This results in the ability for any user with a valid session token to perform arbitrary code execution and full system take-over on all agents. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29822 | 1 Feathersjs | 1 Feathers-sequelize | 2025-03-11 | 10 Critical |
| Due to improper parameter filtering in the Feathers js library, which may ultimately lead to SQL injection | ||||
| CVE-2022-29823 | 1 Feathersjs | 1 Feathers-sequelize | 2025-03-11 | 10 Critical |
| Feather-Sequalize cleanQuery method uses insecure recursive logic to filter unsupported keys from the query object. This results in a Remote Code Execution (RCE) with privileges of application. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24387 | 1 Smartertools | 1 Smartertrack | 2025-03-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| With administrator or admin privileges the application can be tricked into overwriting files in app_data/Config folder, e.g. the systemsettings.xml file. THis is possible in SmarterTrack v100.0.8019.14010 | ||||
| CVE-2023-25578 | 1 Starliteproject | 1 Starlite | 2025-03-10 | 7.5 High |
| Starlite is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. Prior to version 1.5.2, the request body parsing in `starlite` allows a potentially unauthenticated attacker to consume a large amount of CPU time and RAM. The multipart body parser processes an unlimited number of file parts and an unlimited number of field parts. This is a remote, potentially unauthenticated Denial of Service vulnerability. This vulnerability affects applications with a request handler that accepts a `Body(media_type=RequestEncodingType.MULTI_PART)`. The large amount of CPU time required for processing requests can block all available worker processes and significantly delay or slow down the processing of legitimate user requests. The large amount of RAM accumulated while processing requests can lead to Out-Of-Memory kills. Complete DoS is achievable by sending many concurrent multipart requests in a loop. Version 1.51.2 contains a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41725 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 19 Go, Ansible Automation Platform, Cert Manager and 16 more | 2025-03-07 | 7.5 High |
| A denial of service is possible from excessive resource consumption in net/http and mime/multipart. Multipart form parsing with mime/multipart.Reader.ReadForm can consume largely unlimited amounts of memory and disk files. This also affects form parsing in the net/http package with the Request methods FormFile, FormValue, ParseMultipartForm, and PostFormValue. ReadForm takes a maxMemory parameter, and is documented as storing "up to maxMemory bytes +10MB (reserved for non-file parts) in memory". File parts which cannot be stored in memory are stored on disk in temporary files. The unconfigurable 10MB reserved for non-file parts is excessively large and can potentially open a denial of service vector on its own. However, ReadForm did not properly account for all memory consumed by a parsed form, such as map entry overhead, part names, and MIME headers, permitting a maliciously crafted form to consume well over 10MB. In addition, ReadForm contained no limit on the number of disk files created, permitting a relatively small request body to create a large number of disk temporary files. With fix, ReadForm now properly accounts for various forms of memory overhead, and should now stay within its documented limit of 10MB + maxMemory bytes of memory consumption. Users should still be aware that this limit is high and may still be hazardous. In addition, ReadForm now creates at most one on-disk temporary file, combining multiple form parts into a single temporary file. The mime/multipart.File interface type's documentation states, "If stored on disk, the File's underlying concrete type will be an *os.File.". This is no longer the case when a form contains more than one file part, due to this coalescing of parts into a single file. The previous behavior of using distinct files for each form part may be reenabled with the environment variable GODEBUG=multipartfiles=distinct. Users should be aware that multipart.ReadForm and the http.Request methods that call it do not limit the amount of disk consumed by temporary files. Callers can limit the size of form data with http.MaxBytesReader. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27635 | 1 Debian | 1 Debmany | 2025-03-06 | 7.8 High |
| debmany in debian-goodies 0.88.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands (because of an eval call) via a crafted .deb file. (The path is shown to the user before execution.) | ||||
| CVE-2023-27891 | 1 Rami | 1 Pretix | 2025-03-06 | 7.5 High |
| rami.io pretix before 4.17.1 allows OAuth application authorization from a logged-out session. The fixed versions are 4.15.1, 4.16.1, and 4.17.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0848 | 1 Tenda | 2 A18, A18 Firmware | 2025-03-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Tenda A18 up to 15.13.07.09. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function SetCmdlineRun of the file /goform/SetCmdlineRun of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument wpapsk_crypto5g leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49807 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2025-03-06 | 6.4 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.3 Standard Edition is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2023-21593 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Indesign, Macos, Windows | 2025-03-05 | 5.5 Medium |
| Adobe InDesign versions ID18.1 (and earlier) and ID17.4 (and earlier) are affected by a NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to achieve an application denial-of-service in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1470 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Omr | 2025-03-05 | 5.5 Medium |
| In Eclipse OMR, from the initial contribution to version 0.4.0, some OMR internal port library and utilities consumers of z/OS atoe functions do not check their return values for NULL memory pointers or for memory allocation failures. This can lead to NULL pointer dereference crashes. Beginning in version 0.5.0, internal OMR consumers of atoe functions handle NULL return values and memory allocation failures correctly. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1471 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Omr | 2025-03-05 | 7.8 High |
| In Eclipse OMR versions 0.2.0 to 0.4.0, some of the z/OS atoe print functions use a constant length buffer for string conversion. If the input format string and arguments are larger than the buffer size then buffer overflow occurs. Beginning in version 0.5.0, the conversion buffers are sized correctly and checked appropriately to prevent buffer overflows. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45089 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2025-03-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.3 Standard Edition EBICS server could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive filename information due to an observable discrepancy. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40696 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2025-03-05 | 4.8 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.3 Standard Edition is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows a privileged user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47103 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2025-03-05 | 4.8 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.3 Standard Edition is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows a privileged user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47116 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2025-03-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.3 Standard Edition is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31913 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2025-03-05 | 5.5 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.2 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2023-35017 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Governance | 2025-03-04 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0.2 Identity Manager can transmit user credentials in clear text that could be obtained by an attacker using man in the middle techniques. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33838 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Governance | 2025-03-04 | 4.4 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0.2 Identity Manager uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the product does not also use a salt as part of the input. | ||||