Export limit exceeded: 40371 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 40371 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 40371 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (40371 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-0839 | 1 Hp | 1 Linux Imaging And Printing | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The hp-plugin utility in HP Linux Imaging and Printing (HPLIP) makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging use of a short GPG key id from a keyserver to verify print plugin downloads. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4966 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. RabbitMQ management UI stores signed-in user credentials in a browser's local storage without expiration, making it possible to retrieve them using a chained attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6814 | 2 Debian, Wordpress | 2 Debian Linux, Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.3, there is authenticated Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Media File Metadata. This is demonstrated by both (1) mishandling of the playlist shortcode in the wp_playlist_shortcode function in wp-includes/media.php and (2) mishandling of meta information in the renderTracks function in wp-includes/js/mediaelement/wp-playlist.js. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6815 | 2 Debian, Wordpress | 2 Debian Linux, Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.3 (wp-includes/pluggable.php), control characters can trick redirect URL validation. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6816 | 2 Debian, Wordpress | 2 Debian Linux, Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.3 (wp-admin/plugins.php), unintended files can be deleted by administrators using the plugin deletion functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6817 | 2 Debian, Wordpress | 2 Debian Linux, Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.3 (wp-includes/embed.php), there is authenticated Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in YouTube URL Embeds. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6818 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.3 (wp-admin/js/tags-box.js), there is cross-site scripting (XSS) via taxonomy term names. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6819 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.3, there is cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Press This (wp-admin/includes/class-wp-press-this.php), leading to excessive use of server resources. The CSRF can trigger an outbound HTTP request for a large file that is then parsed by Press This. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8461 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows Server 2003, Windows Xp | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| Windows RPC with Routing and Remote Access enabled in Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 allows an attacker to execute code on a targeted RPC server which has Routing and Remote Access enabled via a specially crafted application, aka "Windows RPC Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2017-9306 | 1 Syspass | 1 Syspass | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| inc/SP/Html/Html.class.php in sysPass 2.1.9 allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS filter, as demonstrated by use of an "<svg/onload=" substring instead of an "<svg onload=" substring. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7764 | 1 Netflix | 1 Lemur | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| Lemur 0.1.4 does not use sufficient entropy in its IV when encrypting AES in CBC mode. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12630 | 1 Apache | 1 Drill | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Drill 1.11.0 and earlier when submitting form from Query page users are able to pass arbitrary script or HTML which will take effect on Profile page afterwards. Example: after submitting special script that returns cookie information from Query page, malicious user may obtain this information from Profile page afterwards. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17761 | 1 Ichano | 2 Athome Ip Camera, Athome Ip Camera Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered on Ichano AtHome IP Camera devices. The device runs the "noodles" binary - a service on port 1300 that allows a remote (LAN) unauthenticated user to run arbitrary commands. This binary requires the "system" XML element for specifying the command. For example, a <system>id</system> command results in a <system_ack>ok</system_ack> response. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8509 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Office, Office Compatibility Pack, Office Web Apps and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8510, CVE-2017-8511, CVE-2017-8512, CVE-2017-0260, and CVE-2017-8506. | ||||
| CVE-2017-13779 | 1 Gstn | 1 India Goods And Services Tax Network Offline Utility Tool | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| GSTN_offline_tool in India Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) Offline Utility tool before 1.2 executes winstart-server.vbs from the "C:\GST Offline Tool" directory, which has insecure permissions. This allows local users to gain privileges by replacing winstart-server.vbs with arbitrary VBScript code. For example, a local user could create VBScript code for a TCP reverse shell, and use that later for Remote Command Execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0281 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Office, Office Online Server, Office Web Apps and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Office 2016, Office Online Server 2016, Office Web Apps 2010 SP2,Office Web Apps 2013 SP1, Project Server 2013 SP1, SharePoint Enterprise Server 2013 SP1, SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016, SharePoint Foundation 2013 SP1, Sharepoint Server 2010 SP2, Word 2016, and Skype for Business 2016 allow a remote code execution vulnerability when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0261 and CVE-2017-0262. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9803 | 1 Apache | 1 Solr | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Solr's Kerberos plugin can be configured to use delegation tokens, which allows an application to reuse the authentication of an end-user or another application. There are two issues with this functionality (when using SecurityAwareZkACLProvider type of ACL provider e.g. SaslZkACLProvider). Firstly, access to the security configuration can be leaked to users other than the solr super user. Secondly, malicious users can exploit this leaked configuration for privilege escalation to further expose/modify private data and/or disrupt operations in the Solr cluster. The vulnerability is fixed from Apache Solr 6.6.1 onwards. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6809 | 1 Apache | 2 Nutch, Tika | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Apache Tika before 1.14 allows Java code execution for serialized objects embedded in MATLAB files. The issue exists because Tika invokes JMatIO to do native deserialization. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2310 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos Space | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A firewall bypass vulnerability in the host based firewall of Juniper Networks Junos Space versions prior to 16.1R1 may permit certain crafted packets, representing a network integrity risk. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7660 | 1 Apache | 1 Solr | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Solr uses a PKI based mechanism to secure inter-node communication when security is enabled. It is possible to create a specially crafted node name that does not exist as part of the cluster and point it to a malicious node. This can trick the nodes in cluster to believe that the malicious node is a member of the cluster. So, if Solr users have enabled BasicAuth authentication mechanism using the BasicAuthPlugin or if the user has implemented a custom Authentication plugin, which does not implement either "HttpClientInterceptorPlugin" or "HttpClientBuilderPlugin", his/her servers are vulnerable to this attack. Users who only use SSL without basic authentication or those who use Kerberos are not affected. | ||||