Export limit exceeded: 40313 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 40313 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 40313 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (40313 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-38936 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 Medium |
| IBM QRadar SIEM 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5 could disclose highly sensitive information to a privileged user. IBM X-Force ID: 210893. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38934 | 1 Ibm | 2 Engineering Test Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Engineering Test Management 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 210671. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38915 | 1 Ibm | 1 Data Risk Manager | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Data Risk Manager 2.0.6 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by an authenticated user. IBM X-Force ID: 209947. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38872 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datapower Gateway | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.0.2.0, 10.0.3.0, 10.0.1.0 through 10.0.1.4, and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.17 could allow a remote user to cause a denial of service by consuming resources with multiple requests. IBM X-Force ID: 208348. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38862 | 1 Ibm | 1 Data Risk Manager | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 207980. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38672 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 11, Windows 11 21h2, Windows Server 2022 | 2024-11-21 | 8 High |
| Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-38663 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows exFAT File System Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-38662 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows Fast FAT File System Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-38659 | 1 Microsoft | 1 365 Apps | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office Graphics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-38658 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Office | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office Graphics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-38656 | 1 Microsoft | 1 365 Apps | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-38598 | 1 Openstack | 1 Neutron | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| OpenStack Neutron before 16.4.1, 17.x before 17.1.3, and 18.0.0 allows hardware address impersonation when the linuxbridge driver with ebtables-nft is used on a Netfilter-based platform. By sending carefully crafted packets, anyone in control of a server instance connected to the virtual switch can impersonate the hardware addresses of other systems on the network, resulting in denial of service or in some cases possibly interception of traffic intended for other destinations. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38460 | 1 Moxa | 1 Mxview | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A path traversal vulnerability in the Moxa MXview Network Management software Versions 3.x to 3.2.2 may allow an attacker to create or overwrite critical files used to execute code, such as programs or libraries. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38458 | 1 Moxa | 1 Mxview | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A path traversal vulnerability in the Moxa MXview Network Management software Versions 3.x to 3.2.2 may allow an attacker to create or overwrite critical files used to execute code, such as programs or libraries. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38456 | 1 Moxa | 1 Mxview | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A use of hard-coded password vulnerability in the Moxa MXview Network Management software Versions 3.x to 3.2.2 may allow an attacker to gain access through accounts using default passwords | ||||
| CVE-2021-38452 | 1 Moxa | 1 Mxview | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A path traversal vulnerability in the Moxa MXview Network Management software Versions 3.x to 3.2.2 may allow an attacker to create or overwrite critical files used to execute code, such as programs or libraries. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38432 | 1 Fatek | 2 Communication Server, Communication Server Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| FATEK Automation Communication Server Versions 1.13 and prior lacks proper validation of user-supplied data, which could result in a stack-based buffer overflow condition and allow an attacker to remotely execute code. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38431 | 1 Advantech | 1 Webaccess Scada | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| An authenticated user using Advantech WebAccess SCADA in versions 9.0.3 and prior can use API functions to disclose project names and paths from other users. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38295 | 1 Apache | 1 Couchdb | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
| In Apache CouchDB, a malicious user with permission to create documents in a database is able to attach a HTML attachment to a document. If a CouchDB admin opens that attachment in a browser, e.g. via the CouchDB admin interface Fauxton, any JavaScript code embedded in that HTML attachment will be executed within the security context of that admin. A similar route is available with the already deprecated _show and _list functionality. This privilege escalation vulnerability allows an attacker to add or remove data in any database or make configuration changes. This issue affected Apache CouchDB prior to 3.1.2 | ||||
| CVE-2021-38183 | 1 Sap | 1 Netweaver | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| SAP NetWeaver - versions 700, 701, 702, 730, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, allowing an attacker to cause a potential victim to supply a malicious content to a vulnerable web application, which is then reflected to the victim and executed by the web browser, resulting in Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. | ||||