Export limit exceeded: 13022 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (13022 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-20765 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect comparison for some Intel(R) TDX Guest software before version 0.3.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20770 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some Cluster Management Toolkit for Kubernetes software before version v0.8.5 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20903 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) AI Containers before version v0.4.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21387 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) LLM Library for PyTorch within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21400 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) AI Reference Models before version v3.4.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24693 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) oneCCL Bindings for PyTorch before version v2.8.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28757 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Workload Services Framework software within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16480 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is affected by an improper authorization vulnerability in the certain command, allowing a non-privileged user to bypass authority checks and modify database catalog data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3482 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Aix, Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway and 2 more | 2026-08-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_2, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_2, and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.0_1 could allow an unauthenticated user to read sensitive information by bypassing authentication through a specially crafted HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72802 | 2026-08-12 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the resolveAssetPath endpoint that returns absolute filesystem paths unmodified to CheckAuth-only requests. Attackers can harvest relative asset paths from published documents and submit them to resolveAssetPath to obtain the server's absolute workspace path, disclosing the operating-system username and installation layout. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68076 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-08-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| Apache Airflow's environment-variable secrets backend resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable from the wrong team's scope. The guard meant to prevent this only ran when no team scope was supplied, and its pattern could not match a team name containing an underscore, which team names are allowed to contain. When the guard did not apply, the lookup fell through to an unconditional global read that resolved the stored `AIRFLOW_CONN__<TEAM>___<ID>` variable regardless of which team asked. In multi-team mode an authenticated user of one team could therefore have `POST /api/v2/connections/test` resolve another team's Connection and authenticate outward with that team's credentials; the endpoint uses the credentials rather than returning them. Exploitation requires `[core] multi_team` enabled, `[core] test_connection` set to `Enabled` (it ships `Disabled`), team-scoped secrets provisioned as environment variables in the API-server process, and knowledge of the encoded identifier. Redirecting the test at an attacker-controlled host is separately blocked. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16737 | 2026-08-12 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The WP Travel Engine WordPress plugin before 6.8.5 does not perform authorization or ownership checks when loading a caller-supplied booking identifier in one of its unauthenticated cart actions, allowing unauthenticated attackers to disclose any customer's booking order details and their stored billing information, and to overwrite that customer's booking record with their own data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16538 | 2026-08-12 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| The Wallet for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.6.10 does not verify the amount actually collected for a wallet top-up before crediting the wallet, allowing customers to top up their wallet balance for less than its value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14858 | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP Crowdfunding WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not verify order ownership before returning order details, allowing any authenticated users such as Subscribers to read the personal data of any WooCommerce order and enumerate every order in the store. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69119 | 2026-08-12 | 8.3 High | ||
| Taubyte Tau v1.1.10 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the services/auth HTTP service that allows any authenticated user to read or permanently delete another tenant's project by supplying an arbitrary project ID to the GET and DELETE /projects/{id} endpoints. The GitHubTokenHTTPAuth middleware only validates that a caller presents a valid GitHub OAuth token without verifying ownership or access rights to the target project, enabling attackers with any valid GitHub token to invoke bare KV-store operations such as projects.Fetch and project.Delete against any project ID to achieve cross-tenant project takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73283 | 1 Openbsd | 1 Openssh | 2026-08-12 | 2.5 Low |
| In sshd in OpenSSH before 10.5, the restrict keyword (in authorized_keys) was supposed to be applicable to tunnel forwarding but was not. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66376 | 1 Jfrog | 1 Artifactory | 2026-08-12 | 4.2 Medium |
| Credentials for a deleted user may remain valid for a short period under specific conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10545 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics Local | 2026-08-12 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Planning Analytics Local 2.1.0 through 2.1.21 is vulnerable to an open redirect that allows an attacker to redirect users to arbitrary external websites via a crafted URL. If used in SSO authentication flows, this could result in exposure of session tokens and allow attackers to hijack user sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65938 | 1 Progress Software | 1 Whatsup Gold | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2026.0.2, an improper authorization vulnerability in the Scheduled Reports API allows any authenticated user to invoke restricted actions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15039 | 1 Wso2 | 20 Api Control Plane, Api Manager, Carbon Identity Application Authentication Framework and 17 more | 2026-08-12 | 9.4 Critical |
| The Conditional Authentication (Adaptive Authentication) script does not correctly enforce the completion of all required authentication steps when a specific multi-step pattern involving certain authenticators is configured. This allows an attacker to bypass intermediate authentication challenges by exploiting how the script handles callbacks and re-execution of authentication steps. Successful exploitation allows a malicious actor to gain unauthorized access to a targeted user account. This vulnerability can only be exploited when all of the following conditions are met: the application login flow contains a specific secondary authenticator, the Conditional Authentication script is configured with particular event callbacks and re-executes an authentication step, the targeted user has one of the impacted authenticators enrolled, and the attacker successfully completes any preceding authentication steps. | ||||