Export limit exceeded: 12646 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12646 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-9321 | 1 Traefik | 2 Traefik, Traefik Enterprise | 2026-03-06 | 7.5 High |
| configurationwatcher.go in Traefik 2.x before 2.1.4 and TraefikEE 2.0.0 mishandles the purging of certificate contents from providers before logging. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22681 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 20 Compact Guardlogix 5370, Compact Guardlogix 5380, Compactlogix 1768 and 17 more | 2026-03-06 | 9.8 Critical |
| Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer Versions 21 and later, and RSLogix 5000 Versions 16 through 20 use a key to verify Logix controllers are communicating with Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 1768, 1769, 5370, 5380, 5480: ControlLogix 5550, 5560, 5570, 5580; DriveLogix 5560, 5730, 1794-L34; Compact GuardLogix 5370, 5380; GuardLogix 5570, 5580; SoftLogix 5800. Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer Versions 21 and later and RSLogix 5000: Versions 16 through 20 are vulnerable because an unauthenticated attacker could bypass this verification mechanism and authenticate with Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 1768, 1769, 5370, 5380, 5480: ControlLogix 5550, 5560, 5570, 5580; DriveLogix 5560, 5730, 1794-L34; Compact GuardLogix 5370, 5380; GuardLogix 5570, 5580; SoftLogix 5800. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14691 | 1 Mayan-edms | 1 Mayan Edms | 2026-03-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete." | ||||
| CVE-2025-14692 | 1 Mayan-edms | 1 Mayan Edms | 2026-03-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. This manipulation causes open redirect. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to resolve this issue. The affected component should be upgraded. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete." | ||||
| CVE-2025-34171 | 1 Icewhale | 1 Casaos | 2026-03-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| CasaOS versions up to and including 0.4.15 expose multiple unauthenticated endpoints that allow remote attackers to retrieve sensitive configuration files and system debug information. The /v1/users/image endpoint can be abused with a user-controlled path parameter to access files under /var/lib/casaos/1/, which reveals installed applications and configuration details. Additionally, /v1/sys/debug discloses host operating system, kernel, hardware, and storage information. The endpoints also return distinct error messages, enabling file existence enumeration of arbitrary paths on the underlying host filesystem. This information disclosure can be used for reconnaissance and to facilitate targeted follow-up attacks against services deployed on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66623 | 2 Linuxfoundation, Strimzi | 2 Strimzi, Kafka-operator | 2026-03-04 | 7.4 High |
| Strimzi provides a way to run an Apache Kafka cluster on Kubernetes or OpenShift in various deployment configurations. From 0.47.0 and prior to 0.49.1, in some situations, Strimzi creates an incorrect Kubernetes Role which grants the Apache Kafka Connect and Apache Kafka MirrorMaker 2 operands the GET access to all Kubernetes Secrets that exist in the given Kubernetes namespace. The issue is fixed in Strimzi 0.49.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20358 | 1 Cisco | 3 Adaptive Security Appliance, Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense Software | 2026-03-04 | 6 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) restore functionality that is available in Cisco ASA Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with root-level privileges. Administrator-level privileges are required to exploit this vulnerability. This vulnerability exists because the contents of a backup file are improperly sanitized at restore time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by restoring a crafted backup file to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux operating system as root. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20340 | 1 Cisco | 1 Secure Firewall Management Center | 2026-03-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform an SQL injection attack against an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have a valid account on the device with the role of Security Approver, Intrusion Admin, Access Admin, or Network Admin. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read the contents of databases on the affected device and also obtain limited read access to the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4456 | 1 Mrsam | 2 Net::cidr, Net\ | 2026-03-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Net::CIDR versions before 0.24 for Perl mishandle leading zeros in IP CIDR addresses, which may have unspecified impact. The functions `addr2cidr` and `cidrlookup` may return leading zeros in a CIDR string, which may in turn be parsed as octal numbers by subsequent users. In some cases an attacker may be able to leverage this to bypass access controls based on IP addresses. The documentation advises validating untrusted CIDR strings with the `cidrvalidate` function. However, this mitigation is optional and not enforced by default. In practice, users may call `addr2cidr` or `cidrlookup` with untrusted input and without validation, incorrectly assuming that this is safe. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6075 | 2 Python, Python Software Foundation | 3 Cpython, Python, Cpython | 2026-03-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| If the value passed to os.path.expandvars() is user-controlled a performance degradation is possible when expanding environment variables. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69414 | 1 Plex | 1 Media Server | 2026-02-27 | 8.5 High |
| Plex Media Server (PMS) through 1.42.2.10156 allows retrieval of a permanent access token via a /myplex/account call with a transient access token. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69415 | 1 Plex | 1 Media Server | 2026-02-27 | 7.1 High |
| In Plex Media Server (PMS) through 1.42.2.10156, ability to access /myplex/account with a device token is not properly aligned with whether the device is currently associated with an account. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69416 | 1 Plex | 1 Media Server | 2026-02-27 | 5 Medium |
| In the plex.tv backend for Plex Media Server (PMS) through 2025-12-31, a non-server device token can retrieve other tokens (intended for unrelated access) via clients.plex.tv/devices.xml. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69417 | 1 Plex | 1 Media Server | 2026-02-27 | 5 Medium |
| In the plex.tv backend for Plex Media Server (PMS) through 2025-12-31, a non-server device token can retrieve share tokens (intended for unrelated access) via a shared_servers endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15438 | 1 Pluxml | 1 Pluxml | 2026-02-27 | 4.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in PluXml up to 5.8.22. Affected is the function FileCookieJar::__destruct of the file core/admin/medias.php of the component Media Management Module. Executing a manipulation of the argument File can lead to deserialization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was informed early about this issue and announced that "[w]e fix this issue in the next version 5.8.23". A patch for it is ready. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15437 | 1 Ligerosmart | 1 Ligerosmart | 2026-02-27 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in LigeroSmart up to 6.1.24. This affects an unknown part of the component Environment Variable Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument REQUEST_URI results in cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 6.1.26 and 6.3 is able to mitigate this issue. The patch is named 264ac5b2be5b3c673ebd8cb862e673f5d300d9a7. The affected component should be upgraded. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71160 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-02-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: avoid chain re-validation if possible Hamza Mahfooz reports cpu soft lock-ups in nft_chain_validate(): watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 27s! [iptables-nft-re:37547] [..] RIP: 0010:nft_chain_validate+0xcb/0x110 [nf_tables] [..] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_table_validate+0x6b/0xb0 [nf_tables] nf_tables_validate+0x8b/0xa0 [nf_tables] nf_tables_commit+0x1df/0x1eb0 [nf_tables] [..] Currently nf_tables will traverse the entire table (chain graph), starting from the entry points (base chains), exploring all possible paths (chain jumps). But there are cases where we could avoid revalidation. Consider: 1 input -> j2 -> j3 2 input -> j2 -> j3 3 input -> j1 -> j2 -> j3 Then the second rule does not need to revalidate j2, and, by extension j3, because this was already checked during validation of the first rule. We need to validate it only for rule 3. This is needed because chain loop detection also ensures we do not exceed the jump stack: Just because we know that j2 is cycle free, its last jump might now exceed the allowed stack size. We also need to update all reachable chains with the new largest observed call depth. Care has to be taken to revalidate even if the chain depth won't be an issue: chain validation also ensures that expressions are not called from invalid base chains. For example, the masquerade expression can only be called from NAT postrouting base chains. Therefore we also need to keep record of the base chain context (type, hooknum) and revalidate if the chain becomes reachable from a different hook location. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64124 | 2 Nuvation Energy, Nuvationenergy | 6 Multi-stack Controller, Nplatform, Nuvmsc3-04s-c and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Nuvation Energy Multi-Stack Controller (MSC) allows OS Command Injection.This issue affects Multi-Stack Controller (MSC): before 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64123 | 2 Nuvation Energy, Nuvationenergy | 6 Multi-stack Controller, Nplatform, Nuvmsc3-04s-c and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Unintended Proxy or Intermediary vulnerability in Nuvation Energy Multi-Stack Controller (MSC) allows Network Boundary Bridging.This issue affects Multi-Stack Controller (MSC): through and including release 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64122 | 2 Nuvation Energy, Nuvationenergy | 6 Multi-stack Controller, Nplatform, Nuvmsc3-04s-c and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| Insufficiently Protected Credentials vulnerability in Nuvation Energy Multi-Stack Controller (MSC) allows Signature Spoofing by Key Theft.This issue affects Multi-Stack Controller (MSC): through 2.5.1. | ||||