Export limit exceeded: 382981 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (382981 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-103958 | 2026-10-02 | 7.6 High | ||
| Server-side request forgery in the tool server and remote agent connection handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtain the credentials of the application's own container role and to read responses from arbitrary internal network locations, via a crafted connection address supplied when registering, updating or testing a tool server or remote agent. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.7.0 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63569 | 2026-10-02 | N/A | ||
| Improper input validation in DHAgreement.CalculateAgreement (MTI/A0 two-pass Diffie-Hellman) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an on-path attacker to make the local party compute an agreed value the attacker already knows, defeating the key authentication MTI/A0 is meant to provide. It also allows a malicious peer to learn the local static private key modulo the small factors of p-1, and to recover it entirely in groups with many such factors. The attack uses a crafted out-of-range or small-order ephemeral value, and works because that value is raised to the static private key without the range and subgroup-membership checks applied to DH public keys. Only applications that call DHAgreement directly are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51895 | 1 Infiniflow | 1 Ragflow | 2026-10-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Ragflow 0.24.0 and prior contains improper access control in update_metadata_setting (api/apps/kb_app.py). Depending on the exposed entry, an attacker can perform unauthorized cross-session or privilege-crossing operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103957 | 2026-10-02 | 6.2 Medium | ||
| Server-side request forgery in the OAuth2 discovery handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtain the access token of another user of the deployment and to cause the application to issue requests to arbitrary internal network locations, via a crafted discovery document address supplied when registering a tool server or remote agent configured for delegated authentication. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.7.0 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103956 | 2026-10-02 | 10 Critical | ||
| Missing authentication for critical function in the authentication dependency in Loom for AWS before 1.6.1 allowed remote actors to obtain super-admin authority over the agent control plane, including registering tool servers, reading stored integration credentials, and rewriting the IAM role policies attached to managed agent roles, via any request to the application API in a deployment where no identity provider is configured. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.6.1 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103552 | 1 Apache | 1 Directory Ldap Api | 2026-10-02 | 7.3 High |
| Stack Overflow vulnerability in Apache Directory LDAP API. Before binding, a client can send a deeply nested search filter that overflows the stack in the server's decoder. This issue affects Apache Directory LDAP API: from 1.2.0 before 1.2.9. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.2.9, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39718 | 2026-10-02 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Webriti Wallstreet wallstreet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Wallstreet: from n/a through 2.8.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51916 | 1 Transformeroptimus | 1 Superagi | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| TransformerOptimus SuperAGI v0.0.14 contains an incorrect access control vulnerability in delete_user_knowledge in superagi/controllers/knowledges.py. In affected source snapshots, POST /knowledges/delete/{knowledge_id} deletes the selected knowledge object without requiring authentication in the route and without verifying organization ownership of the supplied knowledge_id. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96940 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Exchange Server 2016, Exchange Server 2019, Exchange Server Se | 2026-10-02 | 8.8 High |
| Weak authorization in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authenticated attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100078 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: iwlwifi: mei: pass correct argument to function The first argument to iwl_mei_write_cyclic_buf() should be the cldev but the q_head pointer is passed instead. Fix it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94418 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-10-02 | 7.5 High |
| Under WOLFSSL_SMALL_CERT_VERIFY, ProcessPeerCertParse() runs the certificate signature check separately from the parse to keep peak memory down, then merges the two results, but it merged the signature result back only when the parse returned 0, so any parse error hid it. ParseCertRelative() reaches its validity-date, name-constraint and critical-extension checks only after ConfirmSignature() has passed, so splitting the signature check out inverts the precedence that makes "override date errors" a sound policy, and ASN_SIG_CONFIRM_E is never surfaced anywhere. The attacker needs no key material from the real PKI and no CA compromise: a self-made certificate carrying the expected subject name, the trusted CA's subject as its issuer, arbitrary bytes where the signature goes, a validity window in the past and the attacker's own key pair is sufficient. Affected builds define WOLFSSL_SMALL_CERT_VERIFY, which is off by default, is not set implicitly by any platform or preset header, and is not reachable from any CMake option; the autotools routes are --enable-lowresource, --enable-leantls, --enable-tinytls13=cert and --enable-tinytls13=mutualauth, and examples/configs/user_settings_embedded.h reaches it through WC_CFG_SMALL_CERT_VERIFY, which ships as 0, while neither --enable-all nor --enable-distro enables it at all. The application must additionally install a verify callback through wolfSSL_CTX_set_verify() or wolfSSL_set_verify() with WOLFSSL_VERIFY_PEER that returns 1 for ASN_BEFORE_DATE_E or ASN_AFTER_DATE_E; wolfSSL ships this exact shape as myVerify() in wolfssl/test.h under VERIFY_OVERRIDE_DATE_ERR, which examples/client -D selects. An application with no callback, or whose callback returns preverify for date errors, still fails the handshake, and wolfSSL_CertManagerVerifyBuffer() and wc_CheckCertSignature() report ASN_SIG_CONFIRM_E correctly in the same binary. TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 are affected in both directions, and DTLS reaches the same function; where the forged certificate is a chain certificate the callback's consent causes it to be cached in the WOLFSSL_CTX certificate manager, so an exposed deployment must restart the context or the process rather than merely reconnect. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15442 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-10-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| In all builds that make use of (D)TLS, including default builds, there is a series of conditional states during the TLS shutdown which could lead to a heap-use-after free. If an application ended up getting a partial wolfSSL_read() which is sometimes caused by a small user buffer passed in, then called wolfSSL_shutdown for a bidirectional close and attempted to wolfSSL_read() again while the peer continues trying to send data during the shutdown it would lead to a state where a potential heap-use-after free happened. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89133 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-10-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| wolfSSL versions 5.9.2 and earlier contain a flaw in the X.509 certificate validation logic where it fails to properly enforce NameConstraints extensions when there is an unconstrained CA tier between a name-constrained intermediate CA and the leaf certificate. wolfSSL incorrectly accepted certificates for hostnames they shouldn't be allowed to cover, due to a chain-walking state-machine bug that resets the validation state when encountering an intermediate without NameConstraints, thereby bypassing cryptographic delegation controls. This defect exists in the default build configuration that makes use of certificates where name constraint extensions are used. Thanks to Jack Lloyd, PathDiff, and Ben Smyth for reporting the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89134 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-10-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| A certificate with no dNSName SAN but another SAN type present (e.g. registeredID or iPAddress) bypassed the Subject CN dNSName name-constraint check. The CN-as-DNS fallback was gated on cert->subjectCN != NULL && cert->altNames == NULL && !cert->isCA instead of "no dNSName SAN", so an out-of-scope CN was accepted. This incomplete fix from CVE-2026-6731, leading to the name-constraint check issue, was introduced in wolfSSL version 5.9.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89135 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-10-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| A failed X509_verify_cert call permanently plants an unverified attacker CA in the shared CertManager, bypassing certificate validation in every type-blind sibling consumer (native TLS, OCSP, CRL, direct CM verify). This affects version 5.8.4 through 5.9.2 of wolfSSL with the macros (OPENSSL_EXTRA && !NO_CERTS && !WOLFCRYPT_ONLY) defined or built with --enable-opensslextra and the application is specifically making calls to the X509_verify_cert function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93302 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-10-02 | 8.2 High |
| MatchTrustedPeer ignores the public key used, leading to forged CA clones passing verification. Affected builds are any that enable the macro WOLFSSL_TRUST_PEER_CERT and load CA certificates with wolfSSL_CTX_trust_peer_cert() or wolfSSL_trust_peer_cert(). The peer must know the certificates being loaded to either of those APIs to take advantage of the issue. When OPENSSL_COMPATIBLE_DEFAULTS is also defined this widens the affected API to include all CA certificate loading. Both macros are defined when using autoconf builds such as (nginx, haproxy, stunnel, wpas, apache httpd, hitch, bind, rsyslog, ffmpeg, all, distro). When the certificate is listed as a trusted peer certificate the issue previously allowed for a malicious (D)TLS server to bypass authentication once knowing which CA’s the client would accept. This also affects mutual authentication cases where the client knows which CA’s the server has loaded. If building with any of these configurations and using (D)TLS where the loaded CA’s could be known and authentication of the peer is desired, users should either: update to the latest wolfSSL version, apply the fix patch, or use the configure flag --disable-openssl-compatible-defaults and not load CA’s with wolfSSL_CTX_trust_peer_cert() or wolfSSL_trust_peer_cert() to mitigate the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51911 | 1 Vanna-ai | 1 Vanna | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| vanna v2.0.2 contains a code injection vulnerability in VannaBase.get_plotly_figure (src/vanna/legacy/base/base.py). Depending on the exposed entry, an attacker can trigger attacker-controlled code or command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75101 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-10-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| An authorization bypass vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed any authenticated user of the instance to read the raw diff or patch of pull requests in private repositories without authorization. Access tokens for raw pull request diffs and patches were scoped to the repository name and pull request number rather than to a globally unique repository identifier, so an attacker who created a repository and pull request matching a target's repository name and pull request number could use a token for their own repository to retrieve the private pull request's contents. Exploitation required the attacker to know the target repository's name and a valid pull request number. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.22 and was fixed in versions 3.17.21, 3.18.15, 3.19.12, 3.20.8, and 3.21.6. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100074 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Mark bpf_refcount field as unique BPF_REFCOUNT is not marked as a unique field, while it should be. Fix this oversight. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51915 | 2026-10-02 | N/A | ||
| TransformerOptimus SuperAGI v0.0.14 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control in the tool controller. In affected source snapshots, get_tool and update_tool in superagi/controllers/tool.py accept a caller-supplied tool_id and fail to verify organization ownership through the associated toolkit. A remote authenticated attacker from one organization can read or modify another organization's tool metadata through /tools/get/{tool_id} and /tools/update/{tool_id}. | ||||