Export limit exceeded: 370242 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (370242 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-81531 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| An information disclosure vulnerability has been identified in Omada Controller. An API endpoint intended for Controller initialization remains accessible after completion and may disclose account-related information to unauthenticated remote users. Successful exploitation may allow an attacker to remote query the affected endpoint that may facilitate user enumeration and subsequent attacks targeting administrative accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62916 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Entra Id, Microsoft Entra Id | 2026-09-08 | 9.1 Critical |
| Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Entra ID allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-52307 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| An authenticated stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Column Management component of ClassCMS 1CMS v5.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via injecting a crafted payload into the title field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78583 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-08 | 8.1 High |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Input Data Manipulation (CAPEC-153). Elasticsearch cluster privilege declarations originating from integration packages were not validated before being used to mint credentials for enrolled Elastic Agents. A user holding Fleet management privileges could therefore cause every Elastic Agent on a targeted policy to receive a credential carrying arbitrarily elevated Elasticsearch cluster privileges, up to and including full cluster administration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75156 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| Apache Airflow FAB provider versions 3.7.3 through 3.8.0 do not validate the issuer or audience of Azure AD `id_token`s during OAuth login. Deployments are affected only when the FAB auth manager is configured with Azure AD as an OAuth provider. Because the signing keys are fetched from Microsoft's **multi-tenant** JWKS endpoint, an `id_token` minted in *any* Azure tenant — including one the attacker creates — passes signature verification, and the username and role assignments are then read from that attacker-controlled token. Anyone able to register an Azure tenant can therefore authenticate to the Airflow UI with no prior access to the deployment. The fix for **CVE-2026-59243** was incomplete, and this advisory closes the remaining gap: that fix made the provider verify the `id_token` signature, but did not add issuer or audience checks. Operators who already applied the CVE-2026-59243 fix are **still affected and must upgrade again** — 3.7.3 is the release that shipped that fix, so every version containing it falls inside this affected range. Upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-fab `3.8.1` or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79377 | 1 Bestechnic | 1 Bes2300 | 2026-09-08 | 7.5 High |
| A heap overflow in the a2dp_decoder_sbc.cpp component of Bestechnic Co., Ltd BES2300 Bluetooth Audio SoC firmware v3.x and earlier allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via sending a crafted L2CAP packet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79576 | 2026-09-08 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An issue in the Single-Sign On (SSO) component of Digital-Infrastructure v9.6.7 allows attackers to authenticate as any user, including the Admin, without a password. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79573 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| L-ONE v1.0.0 was discovered to contain multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the /attachment/getBusinessUploadList component via the busid, id, and taskid parameters. This vulnerability allows attackers to access sensitive database information via a crafted SQL statement. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79575 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| The JWT signing secret in yfexam-exam v2.0 is derived from the username and the current month instead of a random server-side key, making the secret key easily obtainable via a bruteforce attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77101 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| CommServe contained a stack-based buffer overflow issue affecting service availability. Software customers upgrade to resolved maintenance release. Update CommServe. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86732 | 1 Craftcms | 2 Cms, Craft Cms | 2026-09-08 | 8.8 High |
| Craft CMS versions before 5.10.12 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the element-index endpoint that allows authenticated content editors to instantiate arbitrary classes through the criteria parameter. Attackers can inject a malicious class via criteria[withTransforms][0][class] that reaches ImageTransforms::normalizeTransform(), then use a PHP gadget chain with yii\rbac\PhpManager to execute code by pointing itemFile to a request log containing PHP payload in the User-Agent header. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86734 | 2 Grokability, Snipeitapp | 2 Snipe-it, Snipe-it | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Snipe-IT before 8.7.1 fails to validate the length of the note field in the POST /account/accept/{acceptance} endpoint, allowing authenticated users to submit unbounded input that reaches synchronous CommonMark rendering. Attackers can submit large note values to exhaust PHP worker CPU and cause denial of service through resource exhaustion in the markdown parsing pipeline. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86668 | 1 Aircheng-org | 1 Iwebshop-5 | 2026-09-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.15. The impacted element is the function uploadFile of the file controllers/pic.php. Such manipulation of the argument outerSrc/selectPhoto leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78216 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Lua | 2026-09-08 | N/A |
| AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value. Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization. The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible. This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84392 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy | 2026-09-08 | 2.5 Low |
| A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability [CWE-476] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.9.0, FortiPAM 1.8 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to crash the httpsd daemon via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22575 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortimanager, Fortimanagercloud | 2026-09-08 | 4.7 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.10, FortiManager Cloud 7.2 all versions may allow an administrator to bypass the approval process for workflow sessions via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84391 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortianalyzer | 2026-09-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| A use of uninitialized variable vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.3 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to denial of service via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-84393 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2026-09-08 | 7.3 High |
| A improper validation of certificate with host mismatch vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-84385 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortisoaron-premise, Fortisoarpaas | 2026-09-08 | 4.9 Medium |
| A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-78230 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Ai | 2026-09-08 | N/A |
| AshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (min, max, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value. Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; min/max in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool's existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization. The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible. This issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3. | ||||