Export limit exceeded: 16181 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16181 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-21415 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Ai Face Service | 2026-02-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| Authentication bypass by spoofing in Azure AI Face Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21396 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Account, Micrososft Account | 2026-02-26 | 8.2 High |
| Missing authorization in Microsoft Account allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22220 | 1 Vmware | 2 Aria Operations For Logs, Cloud Foundation | 2026-02-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| VMware Aria Operations for Logs contains a privilege escalation vulnerability. A malicious actor with non-administrative privileges and network access to Aria Operations for Logs API may be able to perform certain operations in the context of an admin user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30391 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Dynamics 365 Customer Service | 2026-02-26 | 8.1 High |
| Improper input validation in Microsoft Dynamics allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68358 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-02-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix racy bitfield write in btrfs_clear_space_info_full() From the memory-barriers.txt document regarding memory barrier ordering guarantees: (*) These guarantees do not apply to bitfields, because compilers often generate code to modify these using non-atomic read-modify-write sequences. Do not attempt to use bitfields to synchronize parallel algorithms. (*) Even in cases where bitfields are protected by locks, all fields in a given bitfield must be protected by one lock. If two fields in a given bitfield are protected by different locks, the compiler's non-atomic read-modify-write sequences can cause an update to one field to corrupt the value of an adjacent field. btrfs_space_info has a bitfield sharing an underlying word consisting of the fields full, chunk_alloc, and flush: struct btrfs_space_info { struct btrfs_fs_info * fs_info; /* 0 8 */ struct btrfs_space_info * parent; /* 8 8 */ ... int clamp; /* 172 4 */ unsigned int full:1; /* 176: 0 4 */ unsigned int chunk_alloc:1; /* 176: 1 4 */ unsigned int flush:1; /* 176: 2 4 */ ... Therefore, to be safe from parallel read-modify-writes losing a write to one of the bitfield members protected by a lock, all writes to all the bitfields must use the lock. They almost universally do, except for btrfs_clear_space_info_full() which iterates over the space_infos and writes out found->full = 0 without a lock. Imagine that we have one thread completing a transaction in which we finished deleting a block_group and are thus calling btrfs_clear_space_info_full() while simultaneously the data reclaim ticket infrastructure is running do_async_reclaim_data_space(): T1 T2 btrfs_commit_transaction btrfs_clear_space_info_full data_sinfo->full = 0 READ: full:0, chunk_alloc:0, flush:1 do_async_reclaim_data_space(data_sinfo) spin_lock(&space_info->lock); if(list_empty(tickets)) space_info->flush = 0; READ: full: 0, chunk_alloc:0, flush:1 MOD/WRITE: full: 0, chunk_alloc:0, flush:0 spin_unlock(&space_info->lock); return; MOD/WRITE: full:0, chunk_alloc:0, flush:1 and now data_sinfo->flush is 1 but the reclaim worker has exited. This breaks the invariant that flush is 0 iff there is no work queued or running. Once this invariant is violated, future allocations that go into __reserve_bytes() will add tickets to space_info->tickets but will see space_info->flush is set to 1 and not queue the work. After this, they will block forever on the resulting ticket, as it is now impossible to kick the worker again. I also confirmed by looking at the assembly of the affected kernel that it is doing RMW operations. For example, to set the flush (3rd) bit to 0, the assembly is: andb $0xfb,0x60(%rbx) and similarly for setting the full (1st) bit to 0: andb $0xfe,-0x20(%rax) So I think this is really a bug on practical systems. I have observed a number of systems in this exact state, but am currently unable to reproduce it. Rather than leaving this footgun lying around for the future, take advantage of the fact that there is room in the struct anyway, and that it is already quite large and simply change the three bitfield members to bools. This avoids writes to space_info->full having any effect on ---truncated--- | ||||
| CVE-2025-30389 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Ai Bot Service | 2026-02-26 | 8.7 High |
| Improper authorization in Azure Bot Framework SDK allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33074 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Functions | 2026-02-26 | 7.5 High |
| Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Microsoft Azure Functions allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30390 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Machine Learning | 2026-02-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| Improper authorization in Azure allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30392 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Ai Bot Service | 2026-02-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper authorization in Azure Bot Framework SDK allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21416 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Virtual Desktop | 2026-02-26 | 8.5 High |
| Missing authorization in Azure Virtual Desktop allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11235 | 2 Php, Redhat | 2 Php, Enterprise Linux | 2026-02-26 | 8.1 High |
| In PHP versions 8.3.* before 8.3.19 and 8.4.* before 8.4.5, a code sequence involving __set handler or ??= operator and exceptions can lead to a use-after-free vulnerability. If the third party can control the memory layout leading to this, for example by supplying specially crafted inputs to the script, it could lead to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42999 | 1 Sap | 1 Netweaver | 2026-02-26 | 9.1 Critical |
| SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer Metadata Uploader is vulnerable when a privileged user can upload untrusted or malicious content which, when deserialized, could potentially lead to a compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the host system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4632 | 1 Samsung | 1 Magicinfo 9 Server | 2026-02-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory vulnerability in Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server version before 21.1052 allows attackers to write arbitrary file as system authority. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32756 | 1 Fortinet | 6 Forticamera, Forticamera Firmware, Fortimail and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 9.6 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiCamera 2.1.0 through 2.1.3, FortiCamera 2.0 all versions, FortiCamera 1.1 all versions, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiMail 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiMail 7.0.0 through 7.0.8, FortiNDR 7.6.0, FortiNDR 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiNDR 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, FortiNDR 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiRecorder 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, FortiRecorder 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, FortiRecorder 6.4.0 through 6.4.5, FortiVoice 7.2.0, FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiVoice 6.4.0 through 6.4.10 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via sending HTTP requests with specially crafted hash cookie. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4427 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Endpoint Manager Mobile | 2026-02-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| An authentication bypass in the API component of Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile 12.5.0.0 and prior allows attackers to access protected resources without proper credentials via the API. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4428 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Endpoint Manager Mobile | 2026-02-26 | 7.2 High |
| Remote Code Execution in API component in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile 12.5.0.0 and prior on unspecified platforms allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted API requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29964 | 1 Microsoft | 16 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 13 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Media allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29969 | 1 Microsoft | 24 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 21 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.5 High |
| Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Windows Fundamentals allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30375 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Excel, Excel 2016 and 8 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30383 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Excel, Excel 2016 and 8 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||