Export limit exceeded: 11330 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11330 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1307 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1308, CVE-2019-1335, CVE-2019-1366. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1239 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1238. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1238 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1239. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1230 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows Hyper-V Network Switch on a host operating system fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1166 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| A tampering vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows when a man-in-the-middle attacker is able to successfully bypass the NTLM MIC (Message Integrity Check) protection, aka 'Windows NTLM Tampering Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1070 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Sharepoint Enterprise Server | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| A cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected SharePoint server, aka 'Microsoft Office SharePoint XSS Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1060 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft XML Core Services MSXML parser processes user input, aka 'MS XML Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19942 | 1 Swisscom | 3 Centro Business, Centro Grande, Centro Grande Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Missing output sanitation in Swisscom Centro Grande Centro Grande before 6.16.12, Centro Business 1.0 (ADB) before 7.10.18, and Centro Business 2.0 before 8.02.04 allows a remote attacker to perform DNS spoofing against the web interface via crafted hostnames in DHCP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19844 | 2 Canonical, Djangoproject | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Django | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. (One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address.) | ||||
| CVE-2019-19221 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| In Libarchive 3.4.0, archive_wstring_append_from_mbs in archive_string.c has an out-of-bounds read because of an incorrect mbrtowc or mbtowc call. For example, bsdtar crashes via a crafted archive. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19166 | 2 Microsoft, Tobesoft | 2 Windows, Xplatform | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Tobesoft XPlatform v9.1, 9.2.0, 9.2.1 and 9.2.2 have a vulnerability that can load unauthorized DLL files. It allows attacker to cause remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16935 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Python and 1 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Python and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| The documentation XML-RPC server in Python through 2.7.16, 3.x through 3.6.9, and 3.7.x through 3.7.4 has XSS via the server_title field. This occurs in Lib/DocXMLRPCServer.py in Python 2.x, and in Lib/xmlrpc/server.py in Python 3.x. If set_server_title is called with untrusted input, arbitrary JavaScript can be delivered to clients that visit the http URL for this server. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16769 | 2 Redhat, Verizon | 3 Openshift, Service Mesh, Serialize-javascript | 2024-11-21 | 4.2 Medium |
| The serialize-javascript npm package before version 2.1.1 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS). It does not properly mitigate against unsafe characters in serialized regular expressions. This vulnerability is not affected on Node.js environment since Node.js's implementation of RegExp.prototype.toString() backslash-escapes all forward slashes in regular expressions. If serialized data of regular expression objects are used in an environment other than Node.js, it is affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16394 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Spip | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Spip | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| SPIP before 3.1.11 and 3.2 before 3.2.5 provides different error messages from the password-reminder page depending on whether an e-mail address exists, which might help attackers to enumerate subscribers. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16199 | 1 Eq-3 | 4 Homematic Ccu2, Homematic Ccu2 Firmware, Homematic Ccu3 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| eQ-3 Homematic CCU2 before 2.47.18 and CCU3 before 3.47.18 allow Remote Code Execution by unauthenticated attackers with access to the web interface via an HTTP POST request to certain URLs related to the ReGa core process. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14985 | 1 Eq-3 | 4 Homematic Ccu2, Homematic Ccu2 Firmware, Homematic Ccu3 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| eQ-3 Homematic CCU2 and CCU3 with the CUxD AddOn installed allow Remote Code Execution by unauthenticated attackers with access to the web interface, because this interface can access the CMD_EXEC virtual device type 28. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14905 | 3 Fedoraproject, Opensuse, Redhat | 8 Fedora, Backports Sle, Leap and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.6 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Ansible Engine versions 2.9.x before 2.9.3, 2.8.x before 2.8.8, 2.7.x before 2.7.16 and earlier, where in Ansible's nxos_file_copy module can be used to copy files to a flash or bootflash on NXOS devices. Malicious code could craft the filename parameter to perform OS command injections. This could result in a loss of confidentiality of the system among other issues. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14904 | 2 Debian, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Ansible, Ansible Engine | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in the solaris_zone module from the Ansible Community modules. When setting the name for the zone on the Solaris host, the zone name is checked by listing the process with the 'ps' bare command on the remote machine. An attacker could take advantage of this flaw by crafting the name of the zone and executing arbitrary commands in the remote host. Ansible Engine 2.7.15, 2.8.7, and 2.9.2 as well as previous versions are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14889 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found with the libssh API function ssh_scp_new() in versions before 0.9.3 and before 0.8.8. When the libssh SCP client connects to a server, the scp command, which includes a user-provided path, is executed on the server-side. In case the library is used in a way where users can influence the third parameter of the function, it would become possible for an attacker to inject arbitrary commands, leading to a compromise of the remote target. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14887 | 1 Redhat | 8 Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Cd and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| A flaw was found when an OpenSSL security provider is used with Wildfly, the 'enabled-protocols' value in the Wildfly configuration isn't honored. An attacker could target the traffic sent from Wildfly and downgrade the connection to a weaker version of TLS, potentially breaking the encryption. This could lead to a leak of the data being passed over the network. Wildfly version 7.2.0.GA, 7.2.3.GA and 7.2.5.CR2 are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||