Export limit exceeded: 360132 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 360132 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 360132 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (360132 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-27407 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| graphql-ruby is a Ruby implementation of GraphQL. Starting in version 1.11.5 and prior to versions 1.11.8, 1.12.25, 1.13.24, 2.0.32, 2.1.14, 2.2.17, and 2.3.21, loading a malicious schema definition in `GraphQL::Schema.from_introspection` (or `GraphQL::Schema::Loader.load`) can result in remote code execution. Any system which loads a schema by JSON from an untrusted source is vulnerable, including those that use GraphQL::Client to load external schemas via GraphQL introspection. Versions 1.11.8, 1.12.25, 1.13.24, 2.0.32, 2.1.14, 2.2.17, and 2.3.21 contain a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27408 | 2026-04-15 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| Manifest offers users a one-file micro back end. Prior to version 4.9.2, Manifest employs a weak password hashing implementation that uses SHA3 without a salt. This exposes user passwords to a higher risk of being cracked if an attacker gains access to the database. Without the use of a salt, identical passwords across multiple users will result in the same hash, making it easier for attackers to identify and exploit patterns, thereby accelerating the cracking process. Version 4.9.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27422 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| FACTION is a PenTesting Report Generation and Collaboration Framework. Authentication is bypassed when an attacker registers a new user with admin privileges. This is possible at any time without any authorization. The request must follow the validation rules (no missing information, secure password, etc) but there are no other controls stopping them. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27414 | 1 Minio | 1 Minio | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| MinIO is a high performance object storage. Starting in RELEASE.2024-06-06T09-36-42Z and prior to RELEASE.2025-02-28T09-55-16Z, a bug in evaluating the trust of the SSH key used in an SFTP connection to MinIO allows authentication bypass and unauthorized data access. On a MinIO server with SFTP access configured and using LDAP as an external identity provider, MinIO supports SSH key based authentication for SFTP connections when the user has the `sshPublicKey` attribute set in their LDAP server. The server trusts the client's key only when the public key is the same as the `sshPublicKey` attribute. Due to the bug, when the user has no `sshPublicKey` property in LDAP, the server ends up trusting the key allowing the client to perform any FTP operations allowed by the MinIO access policies associated with the LDAP user (or any of their groups). Three requirements must be met in order to exploit the vulnerability. First, the MinIO server must be configured to allow SFTP access and use LDAP as an external identity provider. Second, the attacker must have knowledge of an LDAP username that does not have the `sshPublicKey` property set. Third, such an LDAP username or one of their groups must also have some MinIO access policy configured. When this bug is successfully exploited, the attacker can perform any FTP operations (i.e. reading, writing, deleting and listing objects) allowed by the access policy associated with the LDAP user account (and their groups). Version 1.2.0 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27416 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Scratch-Coding-Hut.github.io is the website for Coding Hut. The website as of 28 February 2025 contained a sign in with scratch username and password form. Any user who used the sign in page would be susceptible to any other user signing into their account. As of time of publication, a fix is not available but work on a fix is underway. As a workaround, users should avoid signing in. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27421 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Abacus is a highly scalable and stateless counting API. A critical goroutine leak vulnerability has been identified in the Abacus server's Server-Sent Events (SSE) implementation. The issue occurs when clients disconnect from the /stream endpoint, as the server fails to properly clean up resources and terminate associated goroutines. This leads to resource exhaustion where the server continues running but eventually stops accepting new SSE connections while maintaining high memory usage. The vulnerability specifically involves improper channel cleanup in the event handling mechanism, causing goroutines to remain blocked indefinitely. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27428 | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High | ||
| Due to directory traversal vulnerability, an authorized attacker could gain access to some critical information by using RFC enabled function module. Upon successful exploitation, they could read files from any managed system connected to SAP Solution Manager, leading to high impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity or availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32413 | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| Vulnerability-Lookup before 2.7.1 allows stored XSS via a user bio in website/web/views/user.py. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47828 | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| Lumi H5P-Nodejs-library before 9.3.3 omits a sanitizeHtml call for plain text strings. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27430 | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low | ||
| Under certain conditions, an SSRF vulnerability in SAP CRM and SAP S/4HANA (Interaction Center) allows an attacker with low privileges to access restricted information. This flaw enables the attacker to send requests to internal network resources, thereby compromising the application's confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity or availability | ||||
| CVE-2025-27431 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| User management functionality in SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This could enable an attacker to inject malicious payload that gets stored and executed when a user accesses the functionality, hence leading to information disclosure or unauthorized data modifications within the scope of victim�s browser. There is no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27433 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Manage Bank Statements in SAP S/4HANA allows authenticated attacker to bypass certain functionality restrictions of the application and upload files to a reversed bank statement. This vulnerability has a low impact on the application's integrity, with no effect on confidentiality and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27435 | 2026-04-15 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| Under specific conditions and prerequisites, an unauthenticated attacker could access customer coupon codes exposed in the URL parameters of the Coupon Campaign URL in SAP Commerce. This could allow the attacker to use the disclosed coupon code, hence posing a low impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27437 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A Missing Authorization Check vulnerability exists in the Virus Scanner Interface of SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP. Because of this, an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user can initiate a transaction, allowing them to access but not modify non-sensitive data without further authorization and with no effect on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27445 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| A path traversal vulnerability in RSFirewall component 2.9.7 - 3.1.5 for Joomla was discovered. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to read arbitrary files outside the Joomla root directory. The flaw is caused by insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input in file path parameters, allowing attackers to exploit directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../) to access sensitive files | ||||
| CVE-2025-2745 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in AVEVA PI Web API version 2023 SP1 and prior that, if exploited, could allow an authenticated attacker (with privileges to create/update annotations or upload media files) to persist arbitrary JavaScript code that will be executed by users who were socially engineered to disable content security policy protections while rendering annotation attachments from within a web browser. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27498 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| aes-gcm is a pure Rust implementation of the AES-GCM. In decrypt_in_place_detached, the decrypted ciphertext (which is the correct ciphertext) is exposed even if the tag is incorrect. This is because in decrypt_inplace in asconcore.rs, tag verification causes an error to be returned with the plaintext contents still in buffer. The vulnerability is fixed in 0.4.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27509 | 1 Fleetdm | 1 Fleet | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| fleetdm/fleet is an open source device management, built on osquery. In vulnerable versions of Fleet, an attacker could craft a specially-formed SAML response to forge authentication assertions, provision a new administrative user account if Just-In-Time (JIT) provisioning is enabled, or create new accounts tied to forged assertions if f MDM enrollment is enabled. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.64.2, 4.63.2, 4.62.4, and 4.58.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68778 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir1"; 5) We move the new file to some other directory. This results in updating the log tree to included the new INODE_REF for the new location of the file and removes the INODE_REF for the old location. This happens during the rename when we call btrfs_log_new_name(); 6) We fsync the file, and that persists the log tree changes done in the previous step (btrfs_log_new_name() only updates the log tree in memory); 7) We have a power failure; 8) Next time the fs is mounted, log replay happens and when processing the inode for directory "dir1" we find a new INODE_REF and add that link, but we don't remove the old link of the inode since we have not logged the old parent directory of the directory inode "dir1". As a result after log replay finishes when we trigger writeback of the subvolume tree's extent buffers, the tree check will detect that we have a directory a hard link count of 2 and we get a mount failure. The errors and stack traces reported in dmesg/syslog are like this: [ 3845.729764] BTRFS info (device dm-0): start tree-log replay [ 3845.730304] page: refcount:3 mapcount:0 mapping:000000005c8a3027 index:0x1d00 pfn:0x11510c [ 3845.731236] memcg:ffff9264c02f4e00 [ 3845.731751] aops:btree_aops [btrfs] ino:1 [ 3845.732300] flags: 0x17fffc00000400a(uptodate|private|writeback|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff) [ 3845.733346] raw: 017fffc00000400a 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 ffff9264d978aea8 [ 3845.734265] raw: 0000000000001d00 ffff92650e6d4738 00000003ffffffff ffff9264c02f4e00 [ 3845.735305] page dumped because: eb page dump [ 3845.735981] BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=30408704 slot=6 ino=257, invalid nlink: has 2 expect no more than 1 for dir [ 3845.737786] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 30408704 gen 10 total ptrs 17 free space 14881 owner 5 [ 3845.737789] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 4 lock_owner 0 current 30701 [ 3845.737792] item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 [ 3845.737794] inode generation 3 transid 9 size 16 nbytes 16384 [ 3845.737795] block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 [ 3845.737797] rdev 0 sequence 2 flags 0x0 [ 3845.737798] atime 1764259517.0 [ 3845.737800] ctime 1764259517.572889464 [ 3845.737801] mtime 1764259517.572889464 [ 3845.737802] otime 1764259517.0 [ 3845.737803] item 1 key (256 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16111 itemsize 12 [ 3845.737805] index 0 name_len 2 [ 3845.737807] item 2 key (256 DIR_ITEM 2363071922) itemoff 16077 itemsize 34 [ 3845.737808] location key (257 1 0) type 2 [ 3845.737810] transid 9 data_len 0 name_len 4 [ 3845.737811] item 3 key (256 DIR_ITEM 2676584006) itemoff 16043 itemsize 34 [ 3845.737813] location key (258 1 0) type 2 [ 3845.737814] transid 9 data_len 0 name_len 4 [ 3845.737815] item 4 key (256 DIR_INDEX 2) itemoff 16009 itemsize 34 [ 3845.737816] location key (257 1 0) type 2 [ ---truncated--- | ||||
| CVE-2025-27510 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| conda-forge-metadata provides programatic access to conda-forge's metadata. conda-forge-metadata uses an optional dependency - "conda-oci-mirror" which was neither present on the PyPi repository nor registered by any entity. If conda-oci-mirror is taken over by a threat actor, it can result in remote code execution. | ||||