Export limit exceeded: 365306 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (365306 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-3873 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| The following APIs for the Silcon Labs SiWx91x prior to vesion 3.4.0 failed to check the size of the output buffer of the caller which could lead to data corruption on the host (Cortex-M4) application. sl_si91x_aes sl_si91x_gcm sl_si91x_ccm sl_si91x_sha | ||||
| CVE-2025-40556 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in BACnet ATEC 550-440 (All versions), BACnet ATEC 550-441 (All versions), BACnet ATEC 550-445 (All versions), BACnet ATEC 550-446 (All versions). Affected devices improperly handle specific incoming BACnet MSTP messages. This could allow an attacker residing in the same BACnet network to send a specially crafted MSTP message that results in a denial of service condition of the targeted device. A power cycle is required to restore the device's normal operation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42997 | 2026-04-15 | 6.6 Medium | ||
| Under certain conditions, SAP Gateway Client allows a high-privileged user to access restricted information beyond the scope of the application. Due to the possibility of influencing application behavior or performance through misuse of the exposed data, this may potentially lead to low impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43000 | 2026-04-15 | 7.9 High | ||
| Under certain conditions Promotion Management Wizard (PMW) allows an attacker to access information which would otherwise be restricted.This has High impact on Confidentiality with Low impact on Integrity and Availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43005 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SAP GUI for Windows allows an unauthenticated attacker to exploit insecure obfuscation algorithms used by the GuiXT application to store user credentials. While this issue does not impact the Integrity or Availability of the application, it may have a Low impact on the Confidentiality of data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43006 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| SAP Supplier Relationship Management (Master Data Management Catalogue) allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute malicious scripts in the application, potentially leading to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This has no impact on the availability of the application, but it can have some minor impact on its confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43010 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition or on Premise (SCM Master Data Layer (MDL)) allows an authenticated attacker with SAP standard authorization to execute a certain function module remotely and replace arbitrary ABAP programs, including SAP standard programs. This is due to lack of input validation and no authorization checks. This has low Confidentiality impact but high impact on integrity and availability to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43712 | 1 Jhipster | 1 Generator-jhipster | 2026-04-15 | 2.9 Low |
| JHipster before v.8.9.0 allows privilege escalation via a modified authorities parameter. Upon registering in the JHipster portal and logging in as a standard user, the authorities parameter in the response from the api/account endpoint contains the value ROLE_USER. By manipulating the authorities parameter and changing its value to ROLE_ADMIN, the privilege is successfully escalated to an Admin level. This allowed the access to all admin-related functionalities in the application. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because there is no privilege escalation in the context of the JHipster backend (the report only demonstrates that, after using JHipster to generate an application, one can make a non-functional admin screen visible in the front end of that application). | ||||
| CVE-2025-4473 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Frontend Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to a missing capability check on the ajax_request() function in versions 1.0 to 2.2.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to control where the plugin sends outgoing emails. By pointing SMTP to their own server, attackers could capture password reset emails intended for administrators, and elevate their privileges for full site takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4474 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Frontend Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to a missing capability check on the fed_admin_setting_form_function() function in versions 1.0 to 2.2.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to overwrite the plugin’s 'register' role setting to make new user registrations default to the administrator role, leading to an elevation of privileges to that of an administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47278 | 2026-04-15 | 2.3 Low | ||
| Flask is a web server gateway interface (WSGI) web application framework. In Flask 3.1.0, the way fallback key configuration was handled resulted in the last fallback key being used for signing, rather than the current signing key. Signing is provided by the `itsdangerous` library. A list of keys can be passed, and it expects the last (top) key in the list to be the most recent key, and uses that for signing. Flask was incorrectly constructing that list in reverse, passing the signing key first. Sites that have opted-in to use key rotation by setting `SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS` care likely to unexpectedly be signing their sessions with stale keys, and their transition to fresher keys will be impeded. Sessions are still signed, so this would not cause any sort of data integrity loss. Version 3.1.1 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47905 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Varnish Cache before 7.6.3 and 7.7 before 7.7.1, and Varnish Enterprise before 6.0.13r14, allow client-side desync via HTTP/1 requests, because the product incorrectly permits CRLF to be skipped to delimit chunk boundaries. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5124 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Sony SNC-M1, SNC-M3, SNC-RZ25N, SNC-RZ30N, SNC-DS10, SNC-CS3N and SNC-RX570N up to 1.30. This affects an unknown part of the component Administrative Interface. The manipulation leads to use of default credentials. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. It is recommended to change the configuration settings. The vendor was contacted early about this issue. They confirmed the existence but pointed out that they "have published the 'Hardening Guide' on the Web from July 2018 to January 2025 and have thoroughly informed customers of the recommendation to change their initial passwords". | ||||
| CVE-2025-52457 | 1 Gallagher | 1 Command Centre | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| Observable Timing Discrepancy (CWE-208) in HBUS devices may allow an attacker with physical access to the device to extract device-specific keys, potentially compromising further site security. This issue affects Command Centre Server: 9.30 prior to vCR9.30.251028a (distributed in 9.30.2881 (MR3)), 9.20 prior to vCR9.20.251028a (distributed in 9.20.3265 (MR5)), 9.10 prior to vCR9.10.251028a (distributed in 9.10.4135 (MR8)), all versions of 9.00 and prior. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54596 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Abnormal Security /v1.0/rbac/users_v2/{USER_ID}/ before 2025-02-19 allows downgrading the privileges of other user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52889 | 2026-04-15 | 3.4 Low | ||
| Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. When using an ACL on a device connected to a bridge, Incus version 6.12 and 6.13 generates nftables rules for local services (DHCP, DNS...) that partially bypass security options `security.mac_filtering`, `security.ipv4_filtering` and `security.ipv6_filtering`. This can lead to DHCP pool exhaustion and opens the door for other attacks. A patch is available at commit 2516fb19ad8428454cb4edfe70c0a5f0dc1da214. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53360 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Database Inventory | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| pluginsGLPI's Database Inventory Plugin "manages" the Teclib' inventory agents in order to perform an inventory of the databases present on the workstation. In versions prior to 1.0.3, any authenticated user could send requests to agents. This issue has been patched in version 1.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53365 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The MCP Python SDK, called `mcp` on PyPI, is a Python implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Prior to version 1.10.0, if a client deliberately triggers an exception after establishing a streamable HTTP session, this can lead to an uncaught ClosedResourceError on the server side, causing the server to crash and requiring a restart to restore service. Impact may vary depending on the deployment conditions, and presence of infrastructure-level resilience measures. Version 1.10.0 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53372 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| node-code-sandbox-mcp is a Node.js–based Model Context Protocol server that spins up disposable Docker containers to execute arbitrary JavaScript. Prior to 1.3.0, a command injection vulnerability exists in the node-code-sandbox-mcp MCP Server. The vulnerability is caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to child_process.execSync, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges on the host machine, bypassing the sandbox protection of running code inside docker. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53603 | 1 Alinto | 1 Sogo | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| In Alinto SOPE SOGo 2.0.2 through 5.12.2, sope-core/NGExtensions/NGHashMap.m allows a NULL pointer dereference and SOGo crash via a request in which a parameter in the query string is a duplicate of a parameter in the POST body. | ||||