Export limit exceeded: 368550 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (368550 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-31648 | 1 Intel | 1 Processors | 2026-04-15 | 3.9 Low |
| Improper handling of values in the microcode flow for some Intel(R) Processor Family may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and smm adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30513 | 1 Intel | 1 Tdx Module | 2026-04-15 | 7.9 High |
| Race condition for some TDX Module within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30508 | 1 Intel | 1 Intel Platforms | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper authorization in the Intel(R) Quick Assist Technology for some Intel(R) Platforms within Ring 0: Kernel may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30410 | 1 Acronis | 3 Acronis Cyber Protect 15, Acronis Cyber Protect 16, Cyber Protect Cloud Agent | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Sensitive data disclosure and manipulation due to missing authentication. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 39870, Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 39938, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41800. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29952 | 1 Amd | 2 Epyc 9005 Series Processors, Epyc Embedded 9005 Series Processors | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper Initialization within the AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware can allow an admin privileged attacker to corrupt RMP covered memory, potentially resulting in loss of guest memory integrity | ||||
| CVE-2025-29951 | 1 Amd | 4 Ryzen 5000 Series Mobile Processors With Radeon Graphics, Ryzen Embedded R1000 Series Processors, Ryzen Embedded R2000 Series Processors and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A buffer overflow in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) bootloader could allow an attacker to overwrite memory, potentially resulting in privilege escalation and arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29950 | 1 Amd | 19 Epyc 7001 Series Processors, Epyc 7002 Series Processors, Epyc 7003 Series Processors and 16 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in system management mode (SMM) could allow a privileged attacker to overwrite stack memory leading to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29949 | 1 Amd | 17 Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors, Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors With Radeon Graphics, Ryzen 5000 Series Mobile Processors With Radeon Graphics and 14 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Insufficient input parameter sanitization in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) Boot Loader (legacy recovery mode only) could allow an attacker to write out-of-bounds to corrupt Secure DRAM potentially resulting in denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29948 | 1 Amd | 2 Epyc 9005 Series Processors, Epyc Embedded 9005 Series Processors | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper access control in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to bypass RMP protections, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29946 | 1 Amd | 2 Epyc 9005 Series Processors, Epyc Embedded 9005 Series Processors | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Insufficient or Incomplete Data Removal in Hardware Component in SEV firmware doesn't fully flush IOMMU. This can potentially lead to a loss of confidentiality and integrity in guest memory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29939 | 1 Amd | 8 Epyc 7003 Series Processors, Epyc 8004 Series Processors, Epyc 9004 Series Processors and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper access control in secure encrypted virtualization (SEV) could allow a privileged attacker to write to the reverse map page (RMP) during secure nested paging (SNP) initialization, potentially resulting in a loss of guest memory confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27940 | 1 Intel | 1 Tdx Module | 2026-04-15 | 4.1 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read for some TDX Module before version tdx1.5 within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow an information disclosure. Software side channel adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27708 | 1 Intel | 1 Converged Security Management Engine Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 4.1 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in the firmware for some Intel(R) Converged Security and Management Engine (CSME) Firmware (FW) within Ring 0: Kernel may allow an information disclosure. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27572 | 1 Intel | 1 Tdx Module | 2026-04-15 | 4.1 Medium |
| Exposure of sensitive information during transient execution for some TDX within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow an information disclosure. Authorized adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14742 | 2 Brechtvds, Wordpress | 2 Wp Recipe Maker, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Recipe Maker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the 'ajax_search_recipes' and 'ajax_get_recipe' functions in all versions up to, and including, 10.2.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve sensitive recipe information including draft, pending, and private recipes that they shouldn't be able to access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14750 | 1 Weintek | 3 Cmt-ctrl01, Cmt-svrx-820, Cmt3072xh | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The web application does not sufficiently verify inputs that are assumed to be immutable but are actually externally controllable. A low-privileged user can modify the parameters and potentially manipulate account-level privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14751 | 1 Weintek | 3 Cmt-ctrl01, Cmt-svrx-820, Cmt3072xh | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A low-privileged user can bypass account credentials without confirming the user's current authentication state, which may lead to unauthorized privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66269 | 1 Megatec | 1 Upsilon2000 | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The RupsMon and USBMate services in UPSilon 2000 run with SYSTEM privileges and contain unquoted service paths. This allows a local attacker to perform path interception and escalate privileges if they have write permissions to the directories proceeding that of which the real service executables live in | ||||
| CVE-2025-14764 | 1 Amazon | 1 Aws S3 Encryption Client Go | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing cryptographic key commitment in the Amazon S3 Encryption Client for Go may allow a user with write access to the S3 bucket to introduce a new EDK that decrypts to different plaintext when the encrypted data key is stored in an "instruction file" instead of S3's metadata record. To mitigate this issue, upgrade Amazon S3 Encryption Client for Go to version 4.0 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14778 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A significant Broken Access Control vulnerability exists in the UserManagedPermissionService (UMA Protection API). When updating or deleting a UMA policy associated with multiple resources, the authorization check only verifies the caller's ownership against the first resource in the policy's list. This allows a user (Owner A) who owns one resource (RA) to update a shared policy and modify authorization rules for other resources (e.g., RB) in that same policy, even if those other resources are owned by a different user (Owner B). This constitutes a horizontal privilege escalation. | ||||