Export limit exceeded: 365144 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (365144 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-13906 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| The Gallery by BestWebSoft – Customizable Image and Photo Galleries for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 4.7.3 via deserialization of untrusted input in the 'import_gallery_from_csv' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41652 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The devices are vulnerable to an authentication bypass due to flaws in the authorization mechanism. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this weakness by performing brute-force attacks to guess valid credentials or by using MD5 collision techniques to forge authentication hashes, potentially compromising the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59042 | 1 Pyinstaller | 1 Pyinstaller | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| PyInstaller bundles a Python application and all its dependencies into a single package. Due to a special entry being appended to `sys.path` during the bootstrap process of a PyInstaller-frozen application, and due to the bootstrap script attempting to load an optional module for bytecode decryption while this entry is still present in `sys.path`, an application built with PyInstaller < 6.0.0 may be tricked by an unprivileged attacker into executing arbitrary python code when **all** of the following conditions are met. First, the application is built with PyInstaller < 6.0.0; both onedir and onefile mode are affected. Second, the optional bytecode encryption code feature was not enabled during the application build. Third, the attacker can create files/directories in the same directory where the executable is located. Fourth, the filesystem supports creation of files/directories that contain `?` in their name (i.e., non-Windows systems). Fifth, the attacker is able to determine the offset at which the PYZ archive is embedded in the executable. The attacker can create a directory (or a zip archive) next to the executable, with the name that matches the format used by PyInstaller's bootloader to transmit information about the location of PYZ archive to the bootstrap script. If this directory (or zip archive) contains a python module whose name matches the name used by the optional bytecode encryption feature, this module will be loaded and executed by the bootstrap script (in the absence of the real, built-in module that is available when the bytecode-encryption feature is enabled). This results in arbitrary code execution that requires no modification of the executable itself. If the executable is running with elevated privileges (for example, due to having the `setuid` bit set), the code in the injected module is also executed with the said elevated privileges, resulting in a local privilege escalation. PyInstaller 6.0.0 (f5adf291c8b832d5aff7632844f7e3ddf7ad4923) removed support for bytecode encryption; this effectively removes the described attack vector, due to the bootstrap script not attempting to load the optional module for bytecode-decryption anymore. PyInstaller 6.10.0 (cfd60b510f95f92cb81fc42735c399bb781a4739) reworked the bootstrap process to avoid (ab)using `sys.path` for transmitting location of the PYZ archive, which further eliminates the possibility of described injection procedure. If upgrading PyInstaller is not feasible, this issue can be worked around by ensuring proper permissions on directories containing security-sensitive executables (i.e., executables with `setuid` bit set) should mitigate the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41653 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a denial-of-service vulnerability in the device's web server functionality by sending a specially crafted HTTP request with a malicious header, potentially causing the server to crash or become unresponsive. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41654 | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can access information about running processes via the SNMP protocol. The amount of returned data can trigger a reboot by the watchdog. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47227 | 1 Scriptcase | 1 Scriptcase | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| In the Production Environment extension in Netmake ScriptCase through 9.12.006 (23), the Administrator password reset mechanism is mishandled. Making both a GET and a POST request to login.php.is sufficient. An unauthenticated attacker can then bypass authentication via administrator account takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41655 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can access a URL which causes the device to reboot. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41657 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Due to an undocumented active bluetooth stack on products delivered within the period 01.01.2024 to 09.05.2025 fingerprinting is possible by an unauthenticated adjacent attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41658 | 1 Codesys | 1 Control | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| CODESYS Runtime Toolkit-based products may expose sensitive files to local low-privileged operating system users due to default file permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47228 | 1 Scriptcase | 1 Scriptcase | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| In the Production Environment extension in Netmake ScriptCase through 9.12.006 (23), shell injection in the SSH connection settings allows authenticated attackers to execute system commands via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41659 | 1 Codesys | 1 Control | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High |
| A low-privileged attacker can remotely access the PKI folder of the CODESYS Control runtime system and thus read and write certificates and its keys. This allows sensitive data to be extracted or to accept certificates as trusted. Although all services remain available, only unencrypted communication is possible if the certificates are deleted. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54023 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race between balance and cancel/pause Syzbot reported a panic that looks like this: assertion failed: fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED, in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:465 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/messages.c:259! RIP: 0010:btrfs_assertfail+0x2c/0x30 fs/btrfs/messages.c:259 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_exclop_balance fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:465 [inline] btrfs_ioctl_balance fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3564 [inline] btrfs_ioctl+0x531e/0x5b30 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4632 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd The reproducer is running a balance and a cancel or pause in parallel. The way balance finishes is a bit wonky, if we were paused we need to save the balance_ctl in the fs_info, but clear it otherwise and cleanup. However we rely on the return values being specific errors, or having a cancel request or no pause request. If balance completes and returns 0, but we have a pause or cancel request we won't do the appropriate cleanup, and then the next time we try to start a balance we'll trip this ASSERT. The error handling is just wrong here, we always want to clean up, unless we got -ECANCELLED and we set the appropriate pause flag in the exclusive op. With this patch the reproducer ran for an hour without tripping, previously it would trip in less than a few minutes. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41661 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on affected devices due to lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54025 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rsi: Do not configure WoWlan in shutdown hook if not enabled In case WoWlan was never configured during the operation of the system, the hw->wiphy->wowlan_config will be NULL. rsi_config_wowlan() checks whether wowlan_config is non-NULL and if it is not, then WARNs about it. The warning is valid, as during normal operation the rsi_config_wowlan() should only ever be called with non-NULL wowlan_config. In shutdown this rsi_config_wowlan() should only ever be called if WoWlan was configured before by the user. Add checks for non-NULL wowlan_config into the shutdown hook. While at it, check whether the wiphy is also non-NULL before accessing wowlan_config . Drop the single-use wowlan_config variable, just inline it into function call. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41663 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| For u-link Management API an unauthenticated remote attacker in a man-in-the-middle position can inject arbitrary commands in responses returned by WWH servers, which are then executed with elevated privileges. To get into such a position, clients would need to use insecure proxy configurations. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20016 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| OS command injection vulnerability exists in network storage servers STEALTHONE D220/D340/D440 provided by Y'S corporation. A user with an administrative privilege who logged in to the web management page of the affected product may execute an arbitrary OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41665 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| An low privileged remote attacker can enforce the watchdog of the affected devices to reboot the PLC due to incorrect default permissions of a config file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41666 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| A low privileged remote attacker with file access can replace a critical file used by the watchdog to get read, write and execute access to any file on the device after the watchdog has been initialized. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41667 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| A low privileged remote attacker with file access can replace a critical file used by the arp-preinit script to get read, write and execute access to any file on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20055 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| OS command injection vulnerability exists in network storage servers STEALTHONE D220/D340 provided by Y'S corporation. An attacker who can access the affected product may execute an arbitrary OS command. | ||||