Export limit exceeded: 368568 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (368568 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-34093 | 1 Polycom | 1 Hdx | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An authenticated command injection vulnerability exists in the Polycom HDX Series command shell interface accessible over Telnet. The lan traceroute command in the devcmds console accepts unsanitized input, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary system commands. By injecting shell metacharacters through the traceroute interface, an attacker can achieve remote code execution under the context of the root user. This flaw affects systems where Telnet access is enabled and either unauthenticated access is allowed or credentials are known. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34096 | 1 Efssoft | 1 Easy File Sharing Web Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Easy File Sharing HTTP Server version 7.2. The flaw is triggered when a crafted POST request is sent to the /sendemail.ghp endpoint containing an overly long Email parameter. The application fails to properly validate the length of this field, resulting in a memory corruption condition. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the server process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34099 | 1 Vicidial | 1 Vicidial | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An unauthenticated command injection vulnerability exists in VICIdial versions 2.9 RC1 through 2.13 RC1, within the vicidial_sales_viewer.php component when password encryption is enabled (a non-default configuration). The application improperly passes the HTTP Basic Authentication password directly to a call to exec() without adequate sanitation. This allows remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands as the web server user. NOTE: This vulnerability was mitigated in 2017. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34142 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability exists in ETQ Reliance on the CG (legacy) platform within the `/resources/sessions/sso` endpoint. The SAML authentication handler processes XML input without disabling external entity resolution, allowing crafted SAML responses to invoke external entity references. This could enable attackers to retrieve sensitive files or perform server-side request forgery (SSRF). The issue was addressed by disabling external entity processing for the affected XML parser in versions SE.2025.1 and 2025.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6556 | 1 Wpmudev | 1 Smartcrawl | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The SmartCrawl WordPress SEO checker, SEO analyzer, SEO optimizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 3.10.8. This is due the plugin utilizing mobiledetect without preventing direct access to the files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6565 | 1 Vividcolorsjp | 1 Aforms | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The AForms — Form Builder for Price Calculator & Cost Estimation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.6. This is due to the plugin utilizing the aura library and allowing direct access to the phpunit test files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6570 | 2 Codeat, Wordpress | 2 Glossary, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Glossary plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.26. This is due the plugin utilizing wpdesk and not preventing direct access to the test files along with display_errors being enabled. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6574 | 1 Laposta | 1 Laposta Signup Basic | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Laposta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 1.12. This is due to the plugin not preventing direct access to several test files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. This plugin is no longer being maintained and has been closed for downloads. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1574 | 2 Iconics, Mitsubishielectric | 2 Genesis64, Mc Works64 | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in the licensing feature of Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS64 versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric ICONICS Suite versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Hyper Historian versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric AnalytiX versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MobileHMI versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MC Works64 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS32 versions 9.7 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric BizViz versions 9.7 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS64 versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions ICONICS Suite versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions Hyper Historian versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions AnalytiX versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions MobileHMI versions 10.97.2 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS32 versions 9.7 and prior, and Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions BizViz versions 9.7 and prior allows a local attacker to execute a malicious code with administrative privileges by tampering with a specific file that is not protected by the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5597 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in WF Steuerungstechnik GmbH airleader MASTER allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects airleader MASTER: 3.00571. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1850 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| The AI Post Generator | AutoWriter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access, modification or deletion of posts due to a missing capability check on functions hooked by AJAX actions in all versions up to, and including, 3.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber access or higher, to view all posts generated with this plugin (even in non-published status), create new posts (and publish them), publish unpublished post or perform post deletions. CVE-2024-32713 may be a duplicate of this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5598 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Path Traversal vulnerability in WF Steuerungstechnik GmbH airleader MASTER allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects airleader MASTER: 3.0046. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6591 | 1 Nitesh Singh | 1 Ultimate Wordpress Auction Plugin | 2026-04-15 | 5.8 Medium |
| The Ultimate WordPress Auction Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized email creation and sending due to a missing capability check on the 'send_auction_email_callback' and 'resend_auction_email_callback' functions in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.7. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to craft emails that include links and send to any email address. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6599 | 2 Mekshq, Wordpress | 2 Meks Video Importer, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Meks Video Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized API key modification due to a missing capability check on the ajax_save_settings function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.12. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify the plugin's API keys. CVE-2024-38733 may be a duplicate of this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6625 | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| The WP Total Branding – Complete branding solution for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 1.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3755 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-F Series CPU modules allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to read information in the product, to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition in MELSOFT connection, or to stop the operation of the CPU module (causing a DoS condtion on the CPU module), by sending specially crafted packets. The product is needed to reset for recovery. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8308 | 1 Siempelkamp | 1 Umweltoffice | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A low privileged remote attacker can insert a SQL injection in the web application due to improper handling of HTTP request input data which allows to exfiltrate all data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8675 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Soumettre.fr plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the soumettre_disconnect_gateway function in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to disconnect the gateway and delete the API key. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40217 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pidfs: validate extensible ioctls Validate extensible ioctls stricter than we do now. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40220 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers I observed a hang when running generic/323 against a fuseblk server. This test opens a file, initiates a lot of AIO writes to that file descriptor, and closes the file descriptor before the writes complete. Unsurprisingly, the AIO exerciser threads are mostly stuck waiting for responses from the fuseblk server: # cat /proc/372265/task/372313/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_do_getattr+0xfc/0x1f0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_read_iter+0xbe/0x1c0 [fuse] [<0>] aio_read+0x130/0x1e0 [<0>] io_submit_one+0x542/0x860 [<0>] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x98/0x1a0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 But the /weird/ part is that the fuseblk server threads are waiting for responses from itself: # cat /proc/372210/task/372232/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_put+0x9a/0xd0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_release+0x36/0x50 [fuse] [<0>] __fput+0xec/0x2b0 [<0>] task_work_run+0x55/0x90 [<0>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xe9/0x100 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The fuseblk server is fuse2fs so there's nothing all that exciting in the server itself. So why is the fuse server calling fuse_file_put? The commit message for the fstest sheds some light on that: "By closing the file descriptor before calling io_destroy, you pretty much guarantee that the last put on the ioctx will be done in interrupt context (during I/O completion). Aha. AIO fgets a new struct file from the fd when it queues the ioctx. The completion of the FUSE_WRITE command from userspace causes the fuse server to call the AIO completion function. The completion puts the struct file, queuing a delayed fput to the fuse server task. When the fuse server task returns to userspace, it has to run the delayed fput, which in the case of a fuseblk server, it does synchronously. Sending the FUSE_RELEASE command sychronously from fuse server threads is a bad idea because a client program can initiate enough simultaneous AIOs such that all the fuse server threads end up in delayed_fput, and now there aren't any threads left to handle the queued fuse commands. Fix this by only using asynchronous fputs when closing files, and leave a comment explaining why. | ||||