Export limit exceeded: 382620 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (382620 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-46270 | 2026-04-15 | 3.3 Low | ||
| MacPaw The Unarchiver before 4.3.6 contains vulnerability related to missing quarantine attributes for extracted items. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59685 | 1 Kazaar | 1 Kazaar | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Kazaar 1.25.12 allows a JWT with none in the alg field. | ||||
| CVE-2023-53809 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: l2tp: Avoid possible recursive deadlock in l2tp_tunnel_register() When a file descriptor of pppol2tp socket is passed as file descriptor of UDP socket, a recursive deadlock occurs in l2tp_tunnel_register(). This situation is reproduced by the following program: int main(void) { int sock; struct sockaddr_pppol2tp addr; sock = socket(AF_PPPOX, SOCK_DGRAM, PX_PROTO_OL2TP); if (sock < 0) { perror("socket"); return 1; } addr.sa_family = AF_PPPOX; addr.sa_protocol = PX_PROTO_OL2TP; addr.pppol2tp.pid = 0; addr.pppol2tp.fd = sock; addr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_family = PF_INET; addr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_port = htons(0); addr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("192.168.0.1"); addr.pppol2tp.s_tunnel = 1; addr.pppol2tp.s_session = 0; addr.pppol2tp.d_tunnel = 0; addr.pppol2tp.d_session = 0; if (connect(sock, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)) < 0) { perror("connect"); return 1; } return 0; } This program causes the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.2.0-rc5-00205-gc96618275234 #56 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- repro/8607 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: pppol2tp_connect+0xa82/0x1a30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_PPPOX); lock(sk_lock-AF_PPPOX); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 1 lock held by repro/8607: #0: ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: pppol2tp_connect+0xa82/0x1a30 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 8607 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.2.0-rc5-00205-gc96618275234 #56 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x178 __lock_acquire.cold+0x119/0x3b9 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410 lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x610 ? l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0 ? lock_downgrade+0x710/0x710 ? __fget_files+0x283/0x3e0 lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 ? l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0 l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0 ? sprintf+0xc4/0x100 ? l2tp_tunnel_del_work+0x6b0/0x6b0 ? debug_object_deactivate+0x320/0x320 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x16d/0x7a0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x16d/0x7a0 ? l2tp_tunnel_create+0x2bf/0x4b0 ? l2tp_tunnel_create+0x3c6/0x4b0 pppol2tp_connect+0x14e1/0x1a30 ? pppol2tp_put_sk+0xd0/0xd0 ? aa_sk_perm+0x2b7/0xa80 ? aa_af_perm+0x260/0x260 ? bpf_lsm_socket_connect+0x9/0x10 ? pppol2tp_put_sk+0xd0/0xd0 __sys_connect_file+0x14f/0x190 __sys_connect+0x133/0x160 ? __sys_connect_file+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0x1b7/0x200 ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0x147/0x200 ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x396/0x500 __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd This patch fixes the issue by getting/creating the tunnel before locking the pppol2tp socket. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23222 | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High | ||
| An issue was discovered in Deepin dde-api-proxy through 1.0.19 in which unprivileged users can access D-Bus services as root. Specifically, dde-api-proxy runs as root and forwards messages from arbitrary local users to legacy D-Bus methods in the actual D-Bus services, and the actual D-Bus services don't know about the proxy situation (they believe that root is asking them to do things). Consequently several proxied methods, that shouldn't be accessible to non-root users, are accessible to non-root users. In situations where Polkit is involved, the caller would be treated as admin, resulting in a similar escalation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46652 | 1 Izarc | 1 Izarc | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| In IZArc through 4.5, there is a Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. When a user performs an extraction from an archive file that bears Mark-of-the-Web, Mark-of-the-Web is not propagated to the extracted files. NOTE: this is disputed because Mark-of-the-Web propagation can increase risk via security-warning habituation, and because the intended control sphere for file-origin metadata (e.g., HostUrl in Zone.Identifier) may be narrower than that for reading the file's content. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64218 | 2 Wordpress, Wpchill | 2 Wordpress, Passster | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in WP Chill Passster content-protector allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Passster: from n/a through <= 4.2.19. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64213 | 2 Stylemixthemes, Wordpress | 2 Masterstudy Lms, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in StylemixThemes MasterStudy LMS Pro masterstudy-lms-learning-management-system-pro allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects MasterStudy LMS Pro: from n/a through < 4.7.16. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60020 | 1 Nncp | 1 Nncp | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| nncp before 8.12.0 allows path traversal (for reading or writing) during freqing and file saving via a crafted path in packet data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47698 | 1 Cognex | 1 In-sight Explorer | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An adjacent attacker without authentication can exploit this vulnerability to retrieve a set of user-privileged credentials. These credentials are present during the firmware upgrade procedure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64192 | 2 8theme, Wordpress | 2 Xstore, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in 8theme XStore xstore allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects XStore: from n/a through < 9.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54958 | 1 Mubit | 1 Powered Blue | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Powered BLUE 870 versions 0.20130927 and prior contain an OS command injection vulnerability. If this vulnerability is exploited, arbitrary OS commands may be executed on the affected product. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6324 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in MatrixAddons Easy Invoice easy-invoice allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects Easy Invoice: from n/a through <= 2.0.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24939 | 2 Wordpress, Wpchill | 2 Wordpress, Modula Image Gallery | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in WP Chill Modula Image Gallery modula-best-grid-gallery allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Modula Image Gallery: from n/a through <= 2.13.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46614 | 2026-04-15 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In Snowflake ODBC Driver before 3.7.0, in certain code paths, the Driver logged the whole SQL query at the INFO level, aka Insertion of Sensitive Information into a Log File. | ||||
| CVE-2024-44903 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| SQL Injection can occur in the SirsiDynix Horizon Information Portal (IPAC20) through 3.25_9382; however, a patch is available from the vendor. This is in ipac.jsp in a SELECT WHERE statement, in a part of the uri= variable in the second part of the full= inner variable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62291 | 1 Strongswan | 1 Strongswan | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| In the eap-mschapv2 plugin (client-side) in strongSwan before 6.0.3, a malicious EAP-MSCHAPv2 server can send a crafted message of size 6 through 8, and cause an integer underflow that potentially results in a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4418 | 1 Redhat | 3 Advanced Virtualization, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2026-04-15 | 6.2 Medium |
| A race condition leading to a stack use-after-free flaw was found in libvirt. Due to a bad assumption in the virNetClientIOEventLoop() method, the `data` pointer to a stack-allocated virNetClientIOEventData structure ended up being used in the virNetClientIOEventFD callback while the data pointer's stack frame was concurrently being "freed" when returning from virNetClientIOEventLoop(). The 'virtproxyd' daemon can be used to trigger requests. If libvirt is configured with fine-grained access control, this issue, in theory, allows a user to escape their otherwise limited access. This flaw allows a local, unprivileged user to access virtproxyd without authenticating. Remote users would need to authenticate before they could access it. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1907 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Instantel Micromate lacks authentication on a configuration port which could allow an attacker to execute commands if connected. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62102 | 2 Apasionados, Wordpress | 2 Dofollow Case By Case, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apasionados DoFollow Case by Case dofollow-case-by-case allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DoFollow Case by Case: from n/a through <= 3.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42872 | 1 Sap | 1 Netweaver Enterprise Portal | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| Due to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, an unauthenticated attacker could inject malicious scripts that execute in the context of other users� browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, tokens, and other sensitive information. As a result, the vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality and integrity and no impact on availability. | ||||