Export limit exceeded: 405924 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (405924 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-9823 | 1 Mautic | 1 Mautic | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| SummaryA Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of another user’s session. This occurs because user-supplied input is reflected back in the server’s response without proper sanitization or escaping, potentially enabling malicious actions such as session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized actions in the application. DetailsThe vulnerability resides in the “Tags” input field on the /s/ajax?action=lead:addLeadTags endpoint. Although the server applies sanitization before storing the data or returning it later, the payload is executed immediately in the victim’s browser upon reflection, allowing an attacker to run arbitrary JavaScript in the user’s session. ImpactA Reflected XSS attack can have a significant impact, allowing attackers to steal sensitive user data like cookies, redirect users to malicious websites, manipulate the web page content, and essentially take control of a user's session within an application by executing malicious JavaScript code within the victim's browser, even if the server-side code is secure; essentially enabling them to perform actions as if they were the logged-in user. References * Web Security Academy: Cross-site scripting https://portswigger.net/web-security/cross-site-scripting * Web Security Academy: Reflected cross-site scripting https://portswigger.net/web-security/cross-site-scripting/reflected | ||||
| CVE-2025-9824 | 1 Mautic | 1 Mautic | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| ImpactThe attacker can validate if a user exists by checking the time login returns. This timing difference can be used to enumerate valid usernames, after which an attacker could attempt brute force attacks. PatchesThis vulnerability has been patched, implementing a timing-safe form login authenticator that ensures consistent response times regardless of whether a user exists or not. Technical DetailsThe vulnerability was caused by different response times when: * A valid username was provided (password hashing occurred) * An invalid username was provided (no password hashing occurred) The fix introduces a TimingSafeFormLoginAuthenticator that performs a dummy password hash verification even for non-existent users, ensuring consistent timing. WorkaroundsNo workarounds are available. Users should upgrade to the patched version. References * https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/03-Identity_Management_Testing/04-Testing_for_Account_Enumeration_and_Guessable_User_Account | ||||
| CVE-2025-29775 | 1 Redhat | 1 Rhdh | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| xml-crypto is an XML digital signature and encryption library for Node.js. An attacker may be able to exploit a vulnerability in versions prior to 6.0.1, 3.2.1, and 2.1.6 to bypass authentication or authorization mechanisms in systems that rely on xml-crypto for verifying signed XML documents. The vulnerability allows an attacker to modify a valid signed XML message in a way that still passes signature verification checks. For example, it could be used to alter critical identity or access control attributes, enabling an attacker to escalate privileges or impersonate another user. Users of versions 6.0.0 and prior should upgrade to version 6.0.1 to receive a fix. Those who are still using v2.x or v3.x should upgrade to patched versions 2.1.6 or 3.2.1, respectively. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2981 | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Legrand SMS PowerView 1.x. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation of the argument redirect leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2982 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Legrand SMS PowerView 1.x. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation of the argument redirect leads to file inclusion. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59363 | 1 Oneidentity | 1 Onelogin | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High |
| In One Identity OneLogin before 2025.3.0, a request returns the OIDC client secret with GET Apps API v2 (even though this secret should only be returned when an App is first created), | ||||
| CVE-2025-2983 | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in Legrand SMS PowerView 1.x and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument redirect leads to os command injection. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32086 | 1 Intel | 3 Processors, Xeon, Xeon Processors | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| Improperly implemented security check for standard in the DDRIO configuration for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 Processors when using Intel(R) SGX or Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3003 | 1 Esafenet | 1 Cdg | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in ESAFENET CDG 3. Affected is an unknown function of the file /CDGServer3/UserAjax. The manipulation of the argument Username leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3008 | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Novastar CX40 up to 2.44.0. Affected is the function system/popen of the file /usr/nova/bin/netconfig of the component NetFilter Utility. The manipulation leads to command injection. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3009 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Jinher Network OA C6. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /C6/JHSoft.Web.NetDisk/NetDiskProperty.aspx. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30095 | 2026-04-15 | 9 Critical | ||
| VyOS 1.3 through 1.5 (fixed in 1.4.2) or any Debian-based system using dropbear in combination with live-build has the same Dropbear private host keys across different installations. Thus, an attacker can conduct active man-in-the-middle attacks against SSH connections if Dropbear is enabled as the SSH daemon. I n VyOS, this is not the default configuration for the system SSH daemon, but is for the console service. To mitigate this, one can run "rm -f /etc/dropbear/*key*" and/or "rm -f /etc/dropbear-initramfs/*key*" and then dropbearkey -t rsa -s 4096 -f /etc/dropbear_rsa_host_key and reload the service or reboot the system before using Dropbear as the SSH daemon (this clears out all keys mistakenly built into the release image) or update to the latest version of VyOS 1.4 or 1.5. Note that this vulnerability is not unique to VyOS and may appear in any Debian-based Linux distribution that uses Dropbear in combination with live-build, which has a safeguard against this behavior in OpenSSH but no equivalent one for Dropbear. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3010 | 2026-04-15 | 3.3 Low | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Khronos Group glslang 15.1.0. Affected by this issue is the function glslang::TIntermediate::isConversionAllowed of the file glslang/MachineIndependent/Intermediate.cpp. The manipulation leads to null pointer dereference. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3017 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in TA-Lib up to 0.6.4. This issue affects the function setInputBuffer of the file src/tools/ta_regtest/ta_test_func/test_minmax.c of the component ta_regtest. The manipulation leads to out-of-bounds write. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 5879180e9070ec35d52948f2f57519713256a0f1. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40210 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Revert "NFSD: Remove the cap on number of operations per NFSv4 COMPOUND" I've found that pynfs COMP6 now leaves the connection or lease in a strange state, which causes CLOSE9 to hang indefinitely. I've dug into it a little, but I haven't been able to root-cause it yet. However, I bisected to commit 48aab1606fa8 ("NFSD: Remove the cap on number of operations per NFSv4 COMPOUND"). Tianshuo Han also reports a potential vulnerability when decoding an NFSv4 COMPOUND. An attacker can place an arbitrarily large op count in the COMPOUND header, which results in: [ 51.410584] nfsd: vmalloc error: size 1209533382144, exceeds total pages, mode:0xdc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0 when NFSD attempts to allocate the COMPOUND op array. Let's restore the operation-per-COMPOUND limit, but increased to 200 for now. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40256 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: also call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel at destroy time for states that were never added In commit b441cf3f8c4b ("xfrm: delete x->tunnel as we delete x"), I missed the case where state creation fails between full initialization (->init_state has been called) and being inserted on the lists. In this situation, ->init_state has been called, so for IPcomp tunnels, the fallback tunnel has been created and added onto the lists, but the user state never gets added, because we fail before that. The user state doesn't go through __xfrm_state_delete, so we don't call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel for those states, and we end up leaking the FB tunnel. There are several codepaths affected by this: the add/update paths, in both net/key and xfrm, and the migrate code (xfrm_migrate, xfrm_state_migrate). A "proper" rollback of the init_state work would probably be doable in the add/update code, but for migrate it gets more complicated as multiple states may be involved. At some point, the new (not-inserted) state will be destroyed, so call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel during xfrm_state_gc_destroy. Most states will have their fallback tunnel cleaned up during __xfrm_state_delete, which solves the issue that b441cf3f8c4b (and other patches before it) aimed at. All states (including FB tunnels) will be removed from the lists once xfrm_state_fini has called flush_work(&xfrm_state_gc_work). | ||||
| CVE-2025-46811 | 1 Suse | 1 Manager | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Missing Authorization vulnerability in SUSE Linux Manager allows anyone with the ability to connect to port 443 of SUSE Manager is able to run any command as root on any client. This issue affects Container suse/manager/5.0/x86_64/server:5.0.5.7.30.1: from ? before 5.0.27-150600.3.33.1; Image SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS: from ? before 4.3.87-150400.3.110.2; Image SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-Azure: from ? before 4.3.87-150400.3.110.2; Image SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-EC2: from ? before 4.3.87-150400.3.110.2; Image SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-GCE: from ? before 4.3.87-150400.3.110.2; SUSE Manager Server Module 4.3: from ? before 4.3.87-150400.3.110.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60039 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in rascals Noisa noisa allows Object Injection.This issue affects Noisa: from n/a through <= 2.6.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60206 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Beplusthemes Alone alone allows Code Injection.This issue affects Alone: from n/a through <= 7.8.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60214 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in BoldThemes Goldenblatt goldenblatt allows Object Injection.This issue affects Goldenblatt: from n/a through < 1.3.0. | ||||