Export limit exceeded: 359092 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (359092 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-3320 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Monitoring | 2025-08-13 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Tivoli Monitoring 6.3.0.7 through 6.3.0.7 Service Pack 20 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A remote attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the server to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54997 | 2 Openbao, Openbao Project | 2 Openbao, Openbao | 2025-08-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| OpenBao exists to provide a software solution to manage, store, and distribute sensitive data including secrets, certificates, and keys. In versions 2.3.1 and below, some OpenBao deployments intentionally limit privileged API operators from executing system code or making network connections. However, these operators can bypass both restrictions through the audit subsystem by manipulating log prefixes. This allows unauthorized code execution and network access that violates the intended security model. This issue is fixed in version 2.3.2. To workaround, users can block access to sys/audit/* endpoints using explicit deny policies, but root operators cannot be restricted this way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54785 | 2 Salesagility, Suitecrm | 2 Suitecrm, Suitecrm | 2025-08-13 | 8.8 High |
| SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. In versions 7.14.6 and 8.8.0, user-supplied input is not validated/sanitized before it is passed to the unserialize function, which could lead to penetration, privilege escalation, sensitive data exposure, Denial of Service, cryptomining and ransomware. This issue is fixed in version 7.14.7 and 8.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6004 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Vault, Vault Enterprise | 2025-08-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vault and Vault Enterprise’s (“Vault”) user lockout feature could be bypassed for Userpass and LDAP authentication methods. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.1 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.1, 1.19.7, 1.18.12, and 1.16.23. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6011 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Vault, Vault Enterprise | 2025-08-13 | 3.7 Low |
| A timing side channel in Vault and Vault Enterprise’s (“Vault”) userpass auth method allowed an attacker to distinguish between existing and non-existing users, and potentially enumerate valid usernames for Vault’s Userpass auth method. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.1 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.1, 1.19.7, 1.18.12, and 1.16.23. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6014 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Vault, Vault Enterprise | 2025-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Vault and Vault Enterprise’s (“Vault”) TOTP Secrets Engine code validation endpoint is susceptible to code reuse within its validity period. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.1 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.1, 1.19.7, 1.18.12, and 1.16.23. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6015 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Vault, Vault Enterprise | 2025-08-13 | 5.7 Medium |
| Vault and Vault Enterprise’s (“Vault”) login MFA rate limits could be bypassed and TOTP tokens could be reused. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.1 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.1, 1.19.7, 1.18.12, and 1.16.23. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5999 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Vault | 2025-08-13 | 7.2 High |
| A privileged Vault operator with write permissions to the root namespace’s identity endpoint could escalate their own or another user’s token privileges to Vault’s root policy. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.0 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.0, 1.19.6, 1.18.11 and 1.16.22. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6000 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Vault, Vault Enterprise | 2025-08-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| A privileged Vault operator within the root namespace with write permission to {{sys/audit}} may obtain code execution on the underlying host if a plugin directory is set in Vault’s configuration. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.1 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.1, 1.19.7, 1.18.12, and 1.16.23. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4656 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Vault | 2025-08-13 | 3.1 Low |
| Vault Community and Vault Enterprise rekey and recovery key operations can lead to a denial of service due to uncontrolled cancellation by a Vault operator. This vulnerability (CVE-2025-4656) has been remediated in Vault Community Edition 1.20.0 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.0, 1.19.6, 1.18.11, 1.17.17, and 1.16.22. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38013 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2025-08-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.0, 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.3 iFix1, 2.3.3.4, 2.3.3.5, 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.6 iFix1, 2.3.3.6 iFix2, 2.3.3.7, and 2.3.3.7 iFix1 could disclose sensitive information in HTTP responses that could aid in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38271 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2025-08-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.0, 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.3 iFix1, 2.3.3.4, 2.3.3.5, 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.6 iFix1, 2.3.3.6 iFix2, 2.3.3.7, and 2.3.3.7 iFix1 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information from log files. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38713 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2025-08-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.0, 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.3 iFix1, 2.3.3.4, 2.3.3.5, 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.6 iFix1, 2.3.3.6 iFix2, 2.3.3.7, and 2.3.3.7 iFix1 could disclose sensitive information about the system that could aid in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38714 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2025-08-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.0, 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.3 iFix1, 2.3.3.4, 2.3.3.5, 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.6 iFix1, 2.3.3.6 iFix2, 2.3.3.7, and 2.3.3.7 iFix1 could disclose sensitive information about the system that could aid in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38716 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2025-08-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.6, 2.3.36 iFix1, 2.3.3.6 iFix2, 2.3.3.7, 2.3.3.7 iFix1, and 2.3.4.0 could disclose sensitive information about the system that could aid in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43916 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 App Connect Enterprise Certified Container, Openshift | 2025-08-13 | 6.8 Medium |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, 10.0, 10.1, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, 11.6, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 12.5, 12.6, and 12.7 Pods do not restrict network egress for Pods that are used for internal infrastructure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49339 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 4 Aix, Financial Transaction Manager For Multiplatform, Linux On Ibm Z and 1 more | 2025-08-13 | 6.4 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4.0 through 3.2.4.1 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49349 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 4 Aix, Financial Transaction Manager For Multiplatform, Linux On Ibm Z and 1 more | 2025-08-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4.0 through 3.2.4.1 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1215 | 2 Netapp, Vim | 2 Bootstrap Os, Vim | 2025-08-13 | 2.8 Low |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in vim up to 9.1.1096. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file src/main.c. The manipulation of the argument --log leads to memory corruption. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. Upgrading to version 9.1.1097 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as c5654b84480822817bb7b69ebc97c174c91185e9. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20344 | 1 Cisco | 4 Imm Management Package, Ucs 64108, Ucs 6454 and 1 more | 2025-08-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in system resource management in Cisco UCS 6400 and 6500 Series Fabric Interconnects that are in Intersight Managed Mode (IMM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the Device Console UI of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient rate-limiting of TCP connections to an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a high number of TCP packets to the Device Console UI. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to cause the Device Console UI process to crash, resulting in a DoS condition. A manual reload of the fabric interconnect is needed to restore complete functionality. | ||||