Export limit exceeded: 371683 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (371683 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-33814 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 3 Net/http, Go, Http2 | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| When processing HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames, transport will enter an infinite loop of writing CONTINUATION frames if it receives a SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE with a value of 0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33810 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Crypto/x509, Go | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32283 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Crypto Tls, Go | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28780 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2026-09-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in mod_proxy_ajp of Apache HTTP Server. If mod_proxy_ajp connects to a malicious AJP server this AJP server can send a malicious AJP message back to mod_proxy_ajp and cause it to write 4 attacker controlled bytes after the end of a heap based buffer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: through 2.4.66. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.67, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1519 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| If a BIND resolver is performing DNSSEC validation and encounters a maliciously crafted zone, the resolver may consume excessive CPU. Authoritative-only servers are generally unaffected, although there are circumstances where authoritative servers may make recursive queries (see: https://kb.isc.org/docs/why-does-my-authoritative-server-make-recursive-queries). This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.46, 9.20.0 through 9.20.20, 9.21.0 through 9.21.19, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.46-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.20-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17038 | 1 Dreryk | 1 Dreryk Gabinet | 2026-09-10 | N/A |
| DrEryk Gabinet before 11.5.0 uses hard-coded API credentials in its ticket reporting component. These credentials can be used to authenticate directly to the ticket system API. This allows an attacker to perform privileged operations beyond what is offered by the application, including reading and modifying tickets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12143 | 2 Form-data, Redhat | 2 Form-data, Service Mesh | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| form-data is a library for creating readable multipart/form-data streams. In versions through 4.0.5, the `field` argument to `FormData#append` and the `filename` option are concatenated verbatim into the `Content-Disposition` header without escaping carriage return (CR), line feed (LF), or double-quote (") characters. An application that passes attacker-controlled data as a field name or filename (for example, an API gateway that turns JSON object keys into multipart field names) allows the attacker to terminate the header line and inject additional headers, or to smuggle entire additional multipart parts, into the request the application forwards to a backend. This can let the attacker add or override form fields (e.g. set `is_admin=true`) seen by the downstream parser. This is an instance of CWE-93 (CRLF injection). The fix escapes CR, LF, and `"` as `%0D`, `%0A`, and `%22` in field names and filenames, matching the serialization browsers use per the WHATWG HTML multipart/form-data encoding algorithm. Exploitation requires the consuming application to use untrusted input as a field name or filename; applications that use only fixed/trusted field names are not affected. Fixed in 2.5.6, 3.0.5, and 4.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0302 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Checkov By Prisma Cloud | 2026-09-10 | N/A |
| An OS command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Checkov by Prisma® Cloud enables a local user to execute arbitrary commands in the processes running Checkov. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54518 | 1 Amd | 11 Epyc 7002 Series Processors, Epyc Embedded 7002 Series Processors, Ryzen 3000 Series Desktop Processors and 8 more | 2026-09-10 | 7.0 High |
| Improper isolation of shared resources within the CPU operation cache on Zen 2-based products could allow an attacker to corrupt instructions executed at a different privilege level, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72928 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows Server 2025, Windows Server 2025 (server Core Installation) | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| Use after free in Windows DNS allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75993 | 1 Adobe | 2 Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-10 | 8.5 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76190 | 1 Adobe | 2 Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-10 | 8.6 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88896 | 1 Espocrm | 1 Espocrm | 2026-09-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| EspoCRM before 10.0.4 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery. HostCheck::ipAddressIsNotInternal(), which validates outbound URLs to block requests to internal/private IP addresses, strips ::ffff: (IPv4-mapped IPv6) prefixes but does not recognize IPv6 transition addresses that embed private IPv4 addresses: NAT64 (64:ff9b::), 6to4 (2002::), and Teredo (2001:0000::). An attacker who controls a domain with AAAA records pointing to such transition addresses can bypass both the internal-host validation and the CURLOPT_RESOLVE IP-pinning check, causing EspoCRM to issue outbound requests to internal network services. Affected paths include POST /Attachment/fromImageUrl, reachable by any authenticated user with attachment access, and outbound webhook delivery, which requires an admin or API user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88895 | 1 Cyberpanel | 1 Cyberpanel | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| CyberPanel before 3.0.5 fails to enforce two-factor authentication on API endpoints, allowing attackers to bypass TOTP requirements using password-derived tokens. Attackers who obtain an administrator's password can derive API tokens and perform administrative operations or create authenticated sessions without the second factor. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88891 | 1 Openpanel | 1 Openpanel | 2026-09-10 | 8.3 High |
| OpenPanel fails to enforce read-only project access level on 26 of 29 mutating procedures, allowing read-level members to modify, delete, and publish project data. Attackers with explicit read-only access can delete reports and dashboards, schedule entire projects for deletion, publish private analytics to public share links, and modify alerting rules by exploiting missing access level validation in mutation resolvers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88890 | 1 Openpanel | 1 Openpanel | 2026-09-10 | 8.5 High |
| OpenPanel through commit cd24bb8 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the analytics filter builder that fails to validate profile.* filter column identifiers before interpolating them into ClickHouse WHERE clauses. An authenticated attacker with project-scoped read or root export credentials can inject arbitrary ClickHouse SQL to bypass project isolation and read other organizations' analytics data and profile PII via blind boolean oracle techniques. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88886 | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| Renovate is a dependency update automation tool. In versions before 44.14.7 (and in Mend Renovate CE/EE distributions before 15.4.0, and the mend-renovate-enterprise-edition Helm chart before 10.4.0), the manager/gradle-wrapper module does not escape the distributionUrl value read from a repository's gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties file before invoking the Gradle Wrapper CLI. In self-hosted deployments configured with binarySource=docker and allowedUnsafeExecutions=['gradleWrapper', ...], a repository that supplies a crafted distributionUrl (for example, appending a shell metacharacter and command) can cause arbitrary commands to be executed as the Renovate user when Renovate processes a Gradle Wrapper update. The issue is fixed in Renovate 44.14.7; as a workaround, remove 'gradleWrapper' from allowedUnsafeExecutions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88885 | 2026-09-10 | 7 High | ||
| Renovate before 44.14.7 contains a command injection vulnerability in the gomod manager when processing unescaped depName parameters in import-path update commands with binarySource=docker mode. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters through malicious dependency names to execute arbitrary commands as the Renovate user during Go module major version updates with postUpdateOptions gomodUpdateImportPaths enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88881 | 2026-09-10 | 8.6 High | ||
| Renovate, a dependency update tool, follows pagination links supplied by the GitHub server in the HTTP `Link` header when interacting with GitHub.com, GitHub Enterprise Cloud, or GitHub Enterprise Server, and sends the credentials configured for that host to the URL given as the 'next' page. Because the pagination URL is not validated against the host originally contacted, a malicious or compromised GitHub server can return a `Link` header pointing to an attacker-controlled host and cause Renovate to disclose those credentials to it. Exploitation requires that the GitHub server Renovate talks to (as the repository host or as a datasource such as github-releases, github-tags, or git-refs) is already malicious or compromised. The issue is fixed in renovate 44.11.3 (npm and renovate/renovate container images), Mend Renovate CE/EE images and the mend-renovate-ce helm chart 15.4.0, and the mend-renovate-enterprise-edition helm chart 10.4.0. There is no workaround; the pre-existing RENOVATE_X_REBASE_PAGINATION_LINKS option disables the new host check and should only be used with servers that intentionally use different pagination hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88880 | 2026-09-10 | 8.6 High | ||
| Renovate before 44.11.3 fails to validate Link header destinations when following GitLab server pagination, allowing malicious servers to redirect credential-bearing requests. Attackers controlling a compromised GitLab server can specify a Link header pointing to attacker-controlled infrastructure to exfiltrate authentication credentials. | ||||