Export limit exceeded: 29144 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 29144 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (29144 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-52431 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.1.3250 build 20250912 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-53405 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.1.3250 build 20250912 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-53414 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.1.3250 build 20250912 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-52863 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 8.1 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to modify memory or crash processes. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.0.3192 build 20250716 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-52864 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 8.1 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to modify memory or crash processes. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.0.3192 build 20250716 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-52872 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 8.1 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to modify memory or crash processes. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.0.3192 build 20250716 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-54164 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds read vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to obtain secret data. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.1.3250 build 20250912 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-54165 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds read vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to obtain secret data. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.1.3250 build 20250912 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-54166 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds read vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to obtain secret data. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.1.3250 build 20250912 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-47208 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| An allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to prevent other systems, applications, or processes from accessing the same type of resource. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 and later QuTS hero h5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-57705 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems Inc. | 4 Qts, Quts Hero, Qts and 1 more | 2026-01-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| An allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to prevent other systems, applications, or processes from accessing the same type of resource. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.2.7.3256 build 20250913 and later QuTS hero h5.3.1.3250 build 20250912 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-14191 | 1 Utt | 2 512w, 512w Firmware | 2026-01-05 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in UTT 进取 512W up to 1.7.7-171114. Affected by this issue is the function strcpy of the file /goform/formP2PLimitConfig. Such manipulation of the argument except leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32021 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Git and 2 more | 6 Debian Linux, Fedora, Git and 3 more | 2026-01-05 | 3.9 Low |
| Git is a revision control system. Prior to versions 2.45.1, 2.44.1, 2.43.4, 2.42.2, 2.41.1, 2.40.2, and 2.39.4, when cloning a local source repository that contains symlinks via the filesystem, Git may create hardlinks to arbitrary user-readable files on the same filesystem as the target repository in the `objects/` directory. Cloning a local repository over the filesystem may creating hardlinks to arbitrary user-owned files on the same filesystem in the target Git repository's `objects/` directory. When cloning a repository over the filesystem (without explicitly specifying the `file://` protocol or `--no-local`), the optimizations for local cloning will be used, which include attempting to hard link the object files instead of copying them. While the code includes checks against symbolic links in the source repository, which were added during the fix for CVE-2022-39253, these checks can still be raced because the hard link operation ultimately follows symlinks. If the object on the filesystem appears as a file during the check, and then a symlink during the operation, this will allow the adversary to bypass the check and create hardlinks in the destination objects directory to arbitrary, user-readable files. The problem has been patched in versions 2.45.1, 2.44.1, 2.43.4, 2.42.2, 2.41.1, 2.40.2, and 2.39.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32465 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Git and 2 more | 6 Debian Linux, Fedora, Git and 3 more | 2026-01-05 | 7.4 High |
| Git is a revision control system. The Git project recommends to avoid working in untrusted repositories, and instead to clone it first with `git clone --no-local` to obtain a clean copy. Git has specific protections to make that a safe operation even with an untrusted source repository, but vulnerabilities allow those protections to be bypassed. In the context of cloning local repositories owned by other users, this vulnerability has been covered in CVE-2024-32004. But there are circumstances where the fixes for CVE-2024-32004 are not enough: For example, when obtaining a `.zip` file containing a full copy of a Git repository, it should not be trusted by default to be safe, as e.g. hooks could be configured to run within the context of that repository. The problem has been patched in versions 2.45.1, 2.44.1, 2.43.4, 2.42.2, 2.41.1, 2.40.2, and 2.39.4. As a workaround, avoid using Git in repositories that have been obtained via archives from untrusted sources. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66440 | 1 Frappe | 1 Erpnext | 2026-01-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Frappe ERPNext through 15.89.0. Function get_outstanding_reference_documents() at erpnext/accounts/doctype/payment_entry/payment_entry.py is vulnerable to SQL Injection. It allows an attacker to extract arbitrary data from the database by injecting SQL payloads via the to_posting_date parameter, which is directly interpolated into the query without proper sanitization or parameter binding. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66439 | 1 Frappe | 1 Erpnext | 2026-01-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Frappe ERPNext through 15.89.0. Function get_outstanding_reference_documents() at erpnext.accounts.doctype.payment_entry.payment_entry.py is vulnerable to SQL Injection. It allows an attacker to extract arbitrary data from the database by injecting SQL payloads via the from_posting_date parameter, which is directly interpolated into the query without proper sanitization or parameter binding. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66438 | 1 Frappe | 1 Erpnext | 2026-01-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability exists in the Frappe ERPNext through 15.89.0 Print Format rendering mechanism. Specifically, the API frappe.www.printview.get_html_and_style() triggers the rendering of the html field inside a Print Format document using frappe.render_template(template, doc) via the get_rendered_template() call chain. Although ERPNext wraps Jinja2 in a SandboxedEnvironment, it exposes sensitive functions such as frappe.db.sql through get_safe_globals(). An authenticated attacker with permission to create or modify a Print Format can inject arbitrary Jinja expressions into the html field. Once the malicious Print Format is saved, the attacker can call get_html_and_style() with a target document (e.g., Supplier or Sales Invoice) to trigger the render process. This leads to information disclosure from the database, such as database version, schema details, or sensitive values, depending on the injected payload. Exploitation flow: Create a Print Format with SSTI payload in the html field; call the get_html_and_style() API; triggers frappe.render_template(template, doc) inside get_rendered_template(); leaks database information via frappe.db.sql or other exposed globals. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66437 | 1 Frappe | 1 Erpnext | 2026-01-05 | 8.8 High |
| An SSTI (Server-Side Template Injection) vulnerability exists in the get_address_display method of Frappe ERPNext through 15.89.0. This function renders address templates using frappe.render_template() with a context derived from the address_dict parameter, which can be either a dictionary or a string referencing an Address document. Although ERPNext uses a custom Jinja2 SandboxedEnvironment, dangerous functions like frappe.db.sql remain accessible via get_safe_globals(). An authenticated attacker with permission to create or modify an Address Template can inject arbitrary Jinja expressions into the template field. By creating an Address document with a matching country, and then calling the get_address_display API with address_dict="address_name", the system will render the malicious template using attacker-controlled data. This leads to server-side code execution or database information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6719 | 2 Webgarh, Wordpress | 2 Offload Videos, Wordpress | 2026-01-05 | 8.1 High |
| The Offload Videos WordPress plugin before 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow low privilege users to update them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2025-14308 | 2 Robocode, Robocode Project | 2 Robocode, Robocode | 2026-01-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the write method of the Buffer class in Robocode version 1.9.3.6. The method fails to properly validate the length of data being written, allowing attackers to cause an overflow, potentially leading to buffer overflows and arbitrary code execution. This vulnerability can be exploited by submitting specially crafted inputs that manipulate the data length, leading to potential unauthorized code execution. | ||||