Export limit exceeded: 23572 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (23572 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-7550 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible, Enterprise Linux Server, Rhel Extras Other | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| A flaw was found in the way Ansible (2.3.x before 2.3.3, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1) passed certain parameters to the jenkins_plugin module. Remote attackers could use this flaw to expose sensitive information from a remote host's logs. This flaw was fixed by not allowing passwords to be specified in the "params" argument, and noting this in the module documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6809 | 1 Apache | 2 Nutch, Tika | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Apache Tika before 1.14 allows Java code execution for serialized objects embedded in MATLAB files. The issue exists because Tika invokes JMatIO to do native deserialization. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0281 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Office, Office Online Server, Office Web Apps and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Office 2016, Office Online Server 2016, Office Web Apps 2010 SP2,Office Web Apps 2013 SP1, Project Server 2013 SP1, SharePoint Enterprise Server 2013 SP1, SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016, SharePoint Foundation 2013 SP1, Sharepoint Server 2010 SP2, Word 2016, and Skype for Business 2016 allow a remote code execution vulnerability when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0261 and CVE-2017-0262. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2310 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos Space | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A firewall bypass vulnerability in the host based firewall of Juniper Networks Junos Space versions prior to 16.1R1 may permit certain crafted packets, representing a network integrity risk. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7184 | 3 Canonical, Linux, Redhat | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| The xfrm_replay_verify_len function in net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c in the Linux kernel through 4.10.6 does not validate certain size data after an XFRM_MSG_NEWAE update, which allows local users to obtain root privileges or cause a denial of service (heap-based out-of-bounds access) by leveraging the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability, as demonstrated during a Pwn2Own competition at CanSecWest 2017 for the Ubuntu 16.10 linux-image-* package 4.8.0.41.52. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12836 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Gnu | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Cvs | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CVS 1.12.x, when configured to use SSH for remote repositories, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a repository URL with a crafted hostname, as demonstrated by "-oProxyCommand=id;localhost:/bar." | ||||
| CVE-2017-14176 | 2 Canonical, Debian | 3 Bazaar, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Bazaar through 2.7.0, when Subprocess SSH is used, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a bzr+ssh URL with an initial dash character in the hostname, a related issue to CVE-2017-9800, CVE-2017-12836, CVE-2017-12976, CVE-2017-16228, CVE-2017-1000116, and CVE-2017-1000117. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12976 | 1 Git-annex Project | 1 Git-annex | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| git-annex before 6.20170818 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via an ssh URL with an initial dash character in the hostname, as demonstrated by an ssh://-eProxyCommand= URL, a related issue to CVE-2017-9800, CVE-2017-12836, CVE-2017-1000116, and CVE-2017-1000117. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10951 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.0.14878. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within app.launchURL method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-4724. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000099 | 1 Haxx | 1 Libcurl | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When asking to get a file from a file:// URL, libcurl provides a feature that outputs meta-data about the file using HTTP-like headers. The code doing this would send the wrong buffer to the user (stdout or the application's provide callback), which could lead to other private data from the heap to get inadvertently displayed. The wrong buffer was an uninitialized memory area allocated on the heap and if it turned out to not contain any zero byte, it would continue and display the data following that buffer in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9355 | 1 Bd | 1 Alaris 8015 Pc Unit | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) Alaris 8015 Point of Care (PC) unit, Version 9.5 and prior versions, and Version 9.7. An unauthorized user with physical access to an Alaris 8015 PC unit may be able to obtain unencrypted wireless network authentication credentials and other sensitive technical data by disassembling an Alaris 8015 PC unit and accessing the device's flash memory. Older software versions of the Alaris 8015 PC unit, Version 9.5 and prior versions, store wireless network authentication credentials and other sensitive technical data on the affected device's removable flash memory. Being able to remove the flash memory from the affected device reduces the risk of detection, allowing an attacker to extract stored data at the attacker's convenience. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1864 | 1 Kallithea-scm | 1 Kallithea | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the administration pages in Kallithea before 0.2.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) first name or (2) last name user details, or the (3) repository, (4) repository group, or (5) user group description. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14718 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Before version 4.8.2, WordPress was susceptible to a Cross-Site Scripting attack in the link modal via a javascript: or data: URL. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0839 | 1 Hp | 1 Linux Imaging And Printing | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The hp-plugin utility in HP Linux Imaging and Printing (HPLIP) makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging use of a short GPG key id from a keyserver to verify print plugin downloads. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8936 | 1 Squidguard | 1 Squidguard | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in squidGuard.cgi in squidGuard before 1.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a blocked site link. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9263 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| WordPress through 4.8.2, when domain-based flashmediaelement.swf sandboxing is not used, allows remote attackers to conduct cross-domain Flash injection (XSF) attacks by leveraging code contained within the wp-includes/js/mediaelement/flashmediaelement.swf file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16510 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| WordPress before 4.8.3 is affected by an issue where $wpdb->prepare() can create unexpected and unsafe queries leading to potential SQL injection (SQLi) in plugins and themes, as demonstrated by a "double prepare" approach, a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-14723. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14719 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Before version 4.8.2, WordPress was vulnerable to a directory traversal attack during unzip operations in the ZipArchive and PclZip components. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15888 | 1 Synology | 1 Audio Station | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Custom Internet Radio List in Synology Audio Station before 6.3.0-3260 allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the NAME parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2017-13701 | 1 Moxa | 2 Eds-g512e, Eds-g512e Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered on MOXA EDS-G512E 5.1 build 16072215 devices. The backup file contains sensitive information in a insecure way. There is no salt for password hashing. Indeed passwords are stored without being ciphered with a timestamped ciphering method. | ||||